November 06, 2024
Smith's Cases Dropped
Timothy Birdnow
It was ALWAYS political!
Breaking — Merrick Garland, Jack Smith drop both cases against President Trump.
Now that Trump can pardon himself they are going to cut their losses and move on with some new deviltry.
If they don't drop this it may be Mr. Trump won't drop it either - and that could hurt a LOT! They want to keep this dirty trick in reserve for the next time they are in power.
Trump would be a fool to allow both of these men to just walk away from this. It will only invite more of this down the road.
It was ALWAYS political!
Breaking — Merrick Garland, Jack Smith drop both cases against President Trump.
Now that Trump can pardon himself they are going to cut their losses and move on with some new deviltry.
If they don't drop this it may be Mr. Trump won't drop it either - and that could hurt a LOT! They want to keep this dirty trick in reserve for the next time they are in power.
Trump would be a fool to allow both of these men to just walk away from this. It will only invite more of this down the road.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
04:39 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 106 words, total size 1 kb.
The Fight Has Just Begun
Timothy Birdnow
We knew this was coming!
100+ progressive groups are already working on resisting Trump.
They are going to try to Bork Trump like they did last time. We have to be ready to take the fight to these monsters.
BTW the GOP at most barely held the House and may have lost, and only picked up two seats in the senate. Why? Because Congressional Republicans have been cowards all along and unwilling to fight and this is what happens to cowards. McConnell actively worked against MAGA, and when push came to shove MAGA was less interested in working for an ingrate like that. Ditto the House where Squeeker Johnson has betrayed us repeatedly, despite talking a good game.
You can't expect people to stand with you when you won't stand with them.
The fight has just begun, folks.
We knew this was coming!
100+ progressive groups are already working on resisting Trump.
They are going to try to Bork Trump like they did last time. We have to be ready to take the fight to these monsters.
BTW the GOP at most barely held the House and may have lost, and only picked up two seats in the senate. Why? Because Congressional Republicans have been cowards all along and unwilling to fight and this is what happens to cowards. McConnell actively worked against MAGA, and when push came to shove MAGA was less interested in working for an ingrate like that. Ditto the House where Squeeker Johnson has betrayed us repeatedly, despite talking a good game.
You can't expect people to stand with you when you won't stand with them.
The fight has just begun, folks.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
04:34 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 145 words, total size 1 kb.
A Day of Thanks
Timothy Birdnow
Lett us all make today a day of thanks to Almighty God, who heard our plea and defended us against the evil one.
Time to pray in thanksgiving, folks!
BTW I have some turkey thighs and plan to have them with some sweet potatoes for supper - an early thanksgiving in gratitude for what God has wrought today.
At a minimum we all should say a prayer of thanksgiving. This could not have happened without the hand of God. Trump was right; God spared his life to do His work - for US. We should all thank Him!
BTW Half of the pro-abortion amendments passed yesterday. We should all tremble; God is just and it was God who sent those children to us and we will have an accounting for that. My home state of Missouri passed one, and so now abortion on demand is the law of the land up to birth. There will be a terrible price to pay for that.
Lett us all make today a day of thanks to Almighty God, who heard our plea and defended us against the evil one.
Time to pray in thanksgiving, folks!
BTW I have some turkey thighs and plan to have them with some sweet potatoes for supper - an early thanksgiving in gratitude for what God has wrought today.
At a minimum we all should say a prayer of thanksgiving. This could not have happened without the hand of God. Trump was right; God spared his life to do His work - for US. We should all thank Him!
BTW Half of the pro-abortion amendments passed yesterday. We should all tremble; God is just and it was God who sent those children to us and we will have an accounting for that. My home state of Missouri passed one, and so now abortion on demand is the law of the land up to birth. There will be a terrible price to pay for that.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
04:26 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 169 words, total size 1 kb.
Fani Willis Wins Big
Timothy Birdnow
How could THIS happen?
Fani Willis Somehow Wins Reelection in Landslide
This means Willis will continue her one-woman crusade against Trump, and charges will not be dropped. This further means she could well bring down Trump's presidency.
Now more than ever we need to charge her with crimes and remove her from office. She'll never stop and the Democrats will back her, along with the media. She clearly is dirty, and lied under oath about her relationship with her underling. She needs to be impeached by the Georgia legislature.
How do you maintain a viable republican form of government with an electorate so insane as to vote in this type of partisan hack, a hack willing to defecate on the Constitution just for political power?
How could THIS happen?
Fani Willis Somehow Wins Reelection in Landslide
This means Willis will continue her one-woman crusade against Trump, and charges will not be dropped. This further means she could well bring down Trump's presidency.
Now more than ever we need to charge her with crimes and remove her from office. She'll never stop and the Democrats will back her, along with the media. She clearly is dirty, and lied under oath about her relationship with her underling. She needs to be impeached by the Georgia legislature.
How do you maintain a viable republican form of government with an electorate so insane as to vote in this type of partisan hack, a hack willing to defecate on the Constitution just for political power?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
04:15 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 131 words, total size 1 kb.
Catholic Break Big for Trump
Timothy Birdnow
Trump won the Catholic vote by a landslide 15 points in a rebuke to Church leadership, which has moved decidedly leftward under the current Peronista Pontiff and the increasingly leftist Catholic Bishops.
High time; Harris supported so very many anti-Catholic and anti-Christian positions (abortion on demand, transgenderism, etc.) and yet we were all supposed to forget that and vote for her anyway because she wants to steal money from some to give to others in a horrible mockery of Jesus' admonishion to be charitable. Apparently Catholics realized she was a leap too far.
Trump won the Catholic vote by a landslide 15 points in a rebuke to Church leadership, which has moved decidedly leftward under the current Peronista Pontiff and the increasingly leftist Catholic Bishops.
High time; Harris supported so very many anti-Catholic and anti-Christian positions (abortion on demand, transgenderism, etc.) and yet we were all supposed to forget that and vote for her anyway because she wants to steal money from some to give to others in a horrible mockery of Jesus' admonishion to be charitable. Apparently Catholics realized she was a leap too far.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
04:04 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 100 words, total size 1 kb.
Harris FINALLY Concedes!
Timothy Birdnow
Kamala Harris did not speakto her supporters after her crushing defeat by Donald J. Trump in the election last night.
Apparently she was so humiliated by her loss she couldn't be bothered to come out and give a thank you to her people.She had to send a man out to tell the crowd she wouldn't address them. As of 3:30 on the day after the election she is still awol.
This is much like Hillary Clinton, who did the same. I wonder if she's plotting some legal action in a Sore-Loserman, er, Gore-Lieberman style? Maybe. But the numbers are just out of reach no matter how she tries to work them, and there was indeed a lot of cheating but it was from Harris' camp. She cannot dare open THAT can of worms.
At any rate we are well rid of her!
Addendum: as I was writing this Harris finally showed up for her concession speech. Not bad in terms of soaring rhetoric but really just vapid and she continued to laugh and smile in her fake way, proving she has never been a genuine person.
Luckily this should be the last we hear of her. Losing candidates usually disappear by and large and after getting skunked no Democrat will support another run by her.
But her speech with all the talk about "rolling up your sleeves" and "the fight goes on" suggests she may run for Governor of California as a stepping stone to running again for President. So, like Hillary Clinton, we may yet to be shed of her.
Oh, one other thing; on Sebastian Gorka's television show they were flashing a graph showing the voting patterns in the last four elections. Harris performed the same as did all other Democrats EXCEPT Joe Biden who way outperformed in 2020, despite the fact Trump won more votes than anyone in hisotory. It made it plain as day that they cheated last time, with the pandemic rules in place and mail in ballots. The Dems just couldn't pull this off again; a global pandemic is a once-in-a-lifetime gift from God, or in this case Lucifer, for unscrupulous partisans. They just couldn't get away with it.
Kamala Harris did not speakto her supporters after her crushing defeat by Donald J. Trump in the election last night.
Apparently she was so humiliated by her loss she couldn't be bothered to come out and give a thank you to her people.She had to send a man out to tell the crowd she wouldn't address them. As of 3:30 on the day after the election she is still awol.
This is much like Hillary Clinton, who did the same. I wonder if she's plotting some legal action in a Sore-Loserman, er, Gore-Lieberman style? Maybe. But the numbers are just out of reach no matter how she tries to work them, and there was indeed a lot of cheating but it was from Harris' camp. She cannot dare open THAT can of worms.
At any rate we are well rid of her!
Addendum: as I was writing this Harris finally showed up for her concession speech. Not bad in terms of soaring rhetoric but really just vapid and she continued to laugh and smile in her fake way, proving she has never been a genuine person.
Luckily this should be the last we hear of her. Losing candidates usually disappear by and large and after getting skunked no Democrat will support another run by her.
But her speech with all the talk about "rolling up your sleeves" and "the fight goes on" suggests she may run for Governor of California as a stepping stone to running again for President. So, like Hillary Clinton, we may yet to be shed of her.
Oh, one other thing; on Sebastian Gorka's television show they were flashing a graph showing the voting patterns in the last four elections. Harris performed the same as did all other Democrats EXCEPT Joe Biden who way outperformed in 2020, despite the fact Trump won more votes than anyone in hisotory. It made it plain as day that they cheated last time, with the pandemic rules in place and mail in ballots. The Dems just couldn't pull this off again; a global pandemic is a once-in-a-lifetime gift from God, or in this case Lucifer, for unscrupulous partisans. They just couldn't get away with it.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
03:59 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 370 words, total size 2 kb.
Victory!
Timothy Birdnow
"From the far East, I send you one single thought, one sole idea, written in red on every beachhead from Australia to Tokyo – "There is no substitute for victory!"
Douglas MacArthur
19 April 1951
Servant: "Remember thou art mortal"
"Remember thou art mortal"
"Remember thou art mortal"
General: "oh, blow it out your butt!"
From Mel Brooks History of the World Part II.
America has spoken and we win!
Now beware the post-election steal as the Democrats try to deny the GOP House seats, especially in California. And be even more wary of an attempted assassination on Mr. Trump and on Mr. Vance as these people are going to be MOST unpleasant in their death-throes.
"From the far East, I send you one single thought, one sole idea, written in red on every beachhead from Australia to Tokyo – "There is no substitute for victory!"
Douglas MacArthur
19 April 1951
Servant: "Remember thou art mortal"
"Remember thou art mortal"
"Remember thou art mortal"
General: "oh, blow it out your butt!"
From Mel Brooks History of the World Part II.
America has spoken and we win!
Now beware the post-election steal as the Democrats try to deny the GOP House seats, especially in California. And be even more wary of an attempted assassination on Mr. Trump and on Mr. Vance as these people are going to be MOST unpleasant in their death-throes.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
06:20 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.
November 05, 2024
All of Them Marxists
Timothy Birdnow
In the movie Rosemary's Baby the lead character is given a book by her friend about witchcraft "All of Them Witches". I think that title is appropriate here if slightly modified "all of them marxists".
In Shocking Video, Tim Walz’s Education Adviser Urges Overthrow of America
Here are his words:
You can’t be a critical race theorist and be pro-U.S."
Funny; they would scream about insurrectionism if that were a MAGA man.
We are SOOOOO screwed if this cabal winds up staying in power.
In the movie Rosemary's Baby the lead character is given a book by her friend about witchcraft "All of Them Witches". I think that title is appropriate here if slightly modified "all of them marxists".
In Shocking Video, Tim Walz’s Education Adviser Urges Overthrow of America
Here are his words:
"The first tenet of critical race theory is that the United States as constructed is irreversibly racist. So if the nation-state as constructed is irreversibly racist, then it must be done with. It must be overthrown. And so we can’t be like, ‘Oh, no, critical race theory is just about telling our stories, and diversity.’ It’s not about that. It’s about overthrow. It’s insurgent. And we need to be, I think, more honest with that. …
You can’t be a critical race theorist and be pro-U.S."
Funny; they would scream about insurrectionism if that were a MAGA man.
We are SOOOOO screwed if this cabal winds up staying in power.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:16 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 166 words, total size 1 kb.
Philly Commish Office; You Can Vote if You Are a Non-Citizen
Timothy Birdnow
More skullduggery in Philadelphia as the city of brotherly gov tells illegal aliens they can vote if they are residents of the City that Screws You Back.
Philadelphia City Commissioner's Office Tells None-Citizens They Can Vote if They are City Residents
The Commissioner denies they did this but Frank O'Keefe has them on tape!
Milton James, the head honcho of the voting division of teh Commissioner's office, has been telling non-citizens they can vote, and he has been sending them across the street to an NGO named Ceriba to set them up with a ITIN Number to facilitate that.(An Itin number is a taxpayer identification number provided by the IRS to aliens. It stands for Individual taxpayer identification number.)
O'Keefe has been all over Pennsylvania and the fraud occurring there.
My question is, what will happen to this guy, or anyone else involved? Probably nothing, even if Trump wins.
Until this country gets serious about vote fraud and punishes anyone who engages in it with more than a wrist slap it will continue. We have to make penalties severe enough that nobody dares try it.
So if we lose Pennsylvania we probably lose the White House, and that could well wind up being aliens who cause that.
The Democrats are pulling out all stops to steal this thing, which says they are not at all confident that Harris is winning.
More skullduggery in Philadelphia as the city of brotherly gov tells illegal aliens they can vote if they are residents of the City that Screws You Back.
Philadelphia City Commissioner's Office Tells None-Citizens They Can Vote if They are City Residents
The Commissioner denies they did this but Frank O'Keefe has them on tape!
Milton James, the head honcho of the voting division of teh Commissioner's office, has been telling non-citizens they can vote, and he has been sending them across the street to an NGO named Ceriba to set them up with a ITIN Number to facilitate that.(An Itin number is a taxpayer identification number provided by the IRS to aliens. It stands for Individual taxpayer identification number.)
O'Keefe has been all over Pennsylvania and the fraud occurring there.
My question is, what will happen to this guy, or anyone else involved? Probably nothing, even if Trump wins.
Until this country gets serious about vote fraud and punishes anyone who engages in it with more than a wrist slap it will continue. We have to make penalties severe enough that nobody dares try it.
So if we lose Pennsylvania we probably lose the White House, and that could well wind up being aliens who cause that.
The Democrats are pulling out all stops to steal this thing, which says they are not at all confident that Harris is winning.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:47 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 243 words, total size 2 kb.
ABC News Admits Polling Bias
Timothy Birdnow
Here is an article from ABC News about polling bias from an historical perspective.
(ABC stands for "awful bad coverage".)
It's been with us since forever, certainly, but metastasized since the century began, according to this article.
FTA:
Of course the elephant in the room is vote fraud, which is why Obama outperformed his polling numbers. In fact fraud has played a pivotal role in every election since Sore-Loserman challenged Bush's win, and even before that during the Clinton era. But the polls are not about reflecting the public opinion but leading them. And they all play by the same rules, hence you get the same results. These guys clearly coordinate their polling.
Doubt that? Democratic pollster Nate Silver has admitted they all do it out of fear of being an oulier. That is, of course, assuming they aren't doing it because they want to place a thumb on the scale.
The case of Obama cited in the article omits the fact that while the race was predicted as close Obama was always ahead. He simply pulled away on election night, probably because of ballot box stuffing.
The GOP was still operating under a plea agreement from 1984 in which they could not challenge suspected vote fraud by the Democrats; Obama had nothing to lose by stuffing the boxes. Donald Trump pulled the GOP out of the agreement in 2018, 34 years later! How many elections were stolen and not just for the Presidency under this?
At any rate even ABC News, whose news service is run by Clinton's political hatchet man George Stephenopoulis, is admitting the polls aren't to be trusted.
Why now? Could it be they are setting up for the big steal and want to be able to justify it when Harris wins by upset?
Here is an article from ABC News about polling bias from an historical perspective.
(ABC stands for "awful bad coverage".)
It's been with us since forever, certainly, but metastasized since the century began, according to this article.
FTA:
"We’ve talked a lot about how polling error is a fact of life in elections, but polling bias also tends to happen. Now, when we say bias, we don’t mean intentional efforts to put out polls that favor the preferred party of the pollster and/or sponsoring organization. Instead, polling bias indicates to what extent pollsters as a whole over- or under-estimated one party’s actual performance in the election.
For instance, we know that pollsters underestimated Trump’s position in the 2020 presidential election, to the tune of an average bias of about 4 points more Democratic than the real result. In 2016, the bias was similarly around D+3. So we’ve had two straight presidential cycles in which the polls have exaggerated the Democrats’ standing in the polls, which naturally makes people suspicious that we could once again see pollsters undershoot Trump’s actual vote share in 2024.
However, one only has to look a little farther back to see that polling bias does not consistently favor one party or the other. In 2012, pollsters undershot Barack Obama’s result in the presidential race by an average of about 2.5 points. And all told, the average bias in presidential elections dating back to 2000 is about a point more Democratic than the actual outcome. The broader point is, it’s nigh impossible to predict which direction polling bias will go ahead of the election. Pollsters are constantly working to try to overcome the challenges facing their industry, so expecting the past to be prologue when it comes to error and/or bias is a fool’s game."
For instance, we know that pollsters underestimated Trump’s position in the 2020 presidential election, to the tune of an average bias of about 4 points more Democratic than the real result. In 2016, the bias was similarly around D+3. So we’ve had two straight presidential cycles in which the polls have exaggerated the Democrats’ standing in the polls, which naturally makes people suspicious that we could once again see pollsters undershoot Trump’s actual vote share in 2024.
However, one only has to look a little farther back to see that polling bias does not consistently favor one party or the other. In 2012, pollsters undershot Barack Obama’s result in the presidential race by an average of about 2.5 points. And all told, the average bias in presidential elections dating back to 2000 is about a point more Democratic than the actual outcome. The broader point is, it’s nigh impossible to predict which direction polling bias will go ahead of the election. Pollsters are constantly working to try to overcome the challenges facing their industry, so expecting the past to be prologue when it comes to error and/or bias is a fool’s game."
Of course the elephant in the room is vote fraud, which is why Obama outperformed his polling numbers. In fact fraud has played a pivotal role in every election since Sore-Loserman challenged Bush's win, and even before that during the Clinton era. But the polls are not about reflecting the public opinion but leading them. And they all play by the same rules, hence you get the same results. These guys clearly coordinate their polling.
Doubt that? Democratic pollster Nate Silver has admitted they all do it out of fear of being an oulier. That is, of course, assuming they aren't doing it because they want to place a thumb on the scale.
The case of Obama cited in the article omits the fact that while the race was predicted as close Obama was always ahead. He simply pulled away on election night, probably because of ballot box stuffing.
The GOP was still operating under a plea agreement from 1984 in which they could not challenge suspected vote fraud by the Democrats; Obama had nothing to lose by stuffing the boxes. Donald Trump pulled the GOP out of the agreement in 2018, 34 years later! How many elections were stolen and not just for the Presidency under this?
At any rate even ABC News, whose news service is run by Clinton's political hatchet man George Stephenopoulis, is admitting the polls aren't to be trusted.
Why now? Could it be they are setting up for the big steal and want to be able to justify it when Harris wins by upset?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:32 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 565 words, total size 4 kb.
GOP Poll Wattchers Kicked Out in Philly
Timothy Birdnow
Here we go!
Four republican election workers kicked out of Philly precinct.
Here we go!
Four republican election workers kicked out of Philly precinct.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:16 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
A Low Blow
Timothy Birdnow
So Kamala Harris' husband says of her "Kamala did what Kamala always does; put her head down and went to work".
I have absolutely no problem believing this characterization of Kamala. Just ask Willie Brown! HE can tell us how good Kamala does that kind of work.
So Kamala Harris' husband says of her "Kamala did what Kamala always does; put her head down and went to work".
I have absolutely no problem believing this characterization of Kamala. Just ask Willie Brown! HE can tell us how good Kamala does that kind of work.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:01 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
Choking on Red Tape
Timothy Birdnow
1.78 trillion in regulatory costs have been dumped on the American economy by Joe Biden, and it will take Trump all four years of his Presidency to eliminate them.
Any wonder the economy is as flaccid as Truman Capote in a straight strip club?
1.78 trillion in regulatory costs have been dumped on the American economy by Joe Biden, and it will take Trump all four years of his Presidency to eliminate them.
Any wonder the economy is as flaccid as Truman Capote in a straight strip club?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:48 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.
Obama Lies About Trump
Timothy Birdnow
Barack Hussein Obama, peace be upon him (well, the first two letters anyway) repeated the exploded lie that Trump called White Suprmeacists "fine people" in Charlottesville, along with two other whoppers.
While trying to get the Muslim and Jewis vote for Kamala Harris in a speech in Milwaukee, Mr. Obama said:
"Why would you place your faith in someone who instituted a so-called Muslim ban?”
This is not a lie but it is a coloring of the truth in no small measure. In point of fact it was Barack Hussein Obama who issued a "Muslim Ban" back In December 2015, with the Visa Waiver Improvement Program and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act, both of which did the very same thing Mr. Trump's Executive Order 13769, titled Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States did. Trump merely expanded a little Mr. Obama's own program.
The U.S. Suprme Court upheld this travel ban in a ruling on June 26, 2018, I might add.
The point is Obama did it first; Trump merely tweaked Obama's program.
Which brings us to Charlottesville; Trump said specifically he was "not talking about neo-Nazis and white nationalists,” whom he said should be "condemned totally.” He made it perfectly clear he was talking about people at the rally protesting one way or another over the removal of Civil War statutes. The "Unite the Right" rally was about protesting the removal of those statues and renaming the park from the Robert E. Lee park. There were people there protesting peacefully and who did so with good intent on both sides.
The media lied about this, taking only "fine people" out of Trump's statement to make it appear he was speaking in solidarity with Klansmen and neo-Nazis. Obama knows this; he's not a stupid man (well, not THAT stupid) and even the leftist Snopes admits this was a lie, yet here he is repeating the very same lie.
Barack Obama is one of the biggest liars in America and we STILL don't know much about the man. There are many theories, including that his family was planted as Soviet sleeper agents during the Cold War. I don't know but if nothing else Mr. Obama has sought to fundamentally alter America, to bend it to his and his friends' will. And lying is a thing that comes as natural as breathing to communists. Mr. Obama, as a member of the commnist New Party, would understand that. Howard Kurtz dug up the membership roles and proved Obama was listed as a member.
So now he stands up there with his Joker from Batman grin and mockingly peddles his lies.
Always remember, Obama was, is, and always will be a liar and snake in the grass.
BTW one of Trump's last official acts was to commute the sentence of former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, who was serving a long prison sentence for trying to sell Barack Obama's former Senate seat. Blago made the mistake of bucking Mr. Obama and not appointing Obama's personal choice Valerie Jarrott, so Obama saw to it Mr. Blagojevich had the book thrown at him. Nice guy.
If Trump wins he may give Blago a full pardon (and Hunter Biden) showing he is hardly the monster Mr. Obama and the Democrats claim he is. But I wonder; what will Mr. Blagojevich say once he's no longer under the thumb of the judicial system put in place by the Democrats? Will he spill the beans, dump out the skeletons in the closet? The media has not been interesting in anything he has to say but if Blago feels safe enough perhaps he will start speaking.
And who knows what he has on one Barack Hussein Obama.
Barack Hussein Obama, peace be upon him (well, the first two letters anyway) repeated the exploded lie that Trump called White Suprmeacists "fine people" in Charlottesville, along with two other whoppers.
While trying to get the Muslim and Jewis vote for Kamala Harris in a speech in Milwaukee, Mr. Obama said:
"Why would you place your faith in someone who instituted a so-called Muslim ban?”
This is not a lie but it is a coloring of the truth in no small measure. In point of fact it was Barack Hussein Obama who issued a "Muslim Ban" back In December 2015, with the Visa Waiver Improvement Program and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act, both of which did the very same thing Mr. Trump's Executive Order 13769, titled Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States did. Trump merely expanded a little Mr. Obama's own program.
The U.S. Suprme Court upheld this travel ban in a ruling on June 26, 2018, I might add.
The point is Obama did it first; Trump merely tweaked Obama's program.
Which brings us to Charlottesville; Trump said specifically he was "not talking about neo-Nazis and white nationalists,” whom he said should be "condemned totally.” He made it perfectly clear he was talking about people at the rally protesting one way or another over the removal of Civil War statutes. The "Unite the Right" rally was about protesting the removal of those statues and renaming the park from the Robert E. Lee park. There were people there protesting peacefully and who did so with good intent on both sides.
The media lied about this, taking only "fine people" out of Trump's statement to make it appear he was speaking in solidarity with Klansmen and neo-Nazis. Obama knows this; he's not a stupid man (well, not THAT stupid) and even the leftist Snopes admits this was a lie, yet here he is repeating the very same lie.
Barack Obama is one of the biggest liars in America and we STILL don't know much about the man. There are many theories, including that his family was planted as Soviet sleeper agents during the Cold War. I don't know but if nothing else Mr. Obama has sought to fundamentally alter America, to bend it to his and his friends' will. And lying is a thing that comes as natural as breathing to communists. Mr. Obama, as a member of the commnist New Party, would understand that. Howard Kurtz dug up the membership roles and proved Obama was listed as a member.
So now he stands up there with his Joker from Batman grin and mockingly peddles his lies.
Always remember, Obama was, is, and always will be a liar and snake in the grass.
BTW one of Trump's last official acts was to commute the sentence of former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, who was serving a long prison sentence for trying to sell Barack Obama's former Senate seat. Blago made the mistake of bucking Mr. Obama and not appointing Obama's personal choice Valerie Jarrott, so Obama saw to it Mr. Blagojevich had the book thrown at him. Nice guy.
If Trump wins he may give Blago a full pardon (and Hunter Biden) showing he is hardly the monster Mr. Obama and the Democrats claim he is. But I wonder; what will Mr. Blagojevich say once he's no longer under the thumb of the judicial system put in place by the Democrats? Will he spill the beans, dump out the skeletons in the closet? The media has not been interesting in anything he has to say but if Blago feels safe enough perhaps he will start speaking.
And who knows what he has on one Barack Hussein Obama.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:44 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 625 words, total size 4 kb.
States Sue DHS
Timothy Birdnow
Several states are suing tthe DHS over their refusal to cooperate in validating the citizenship of people who have registered to vote.
At the same time Myorkas and DHS have been suing states to force them to not verify their voter rolls.
Myorkas was already impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, although chuck Schumer (in an illegal move) simply did not allow a trial. These are just more grounds for impeachment.
If Trump wins Myorkas should be charged with crimes.
Several states are suing tthe DHS over their refusal to cooperate in validating the citizenship of people who have registered to vote.
At the same time Myorkas and DHS have been suing states to force them to not verify their voter rolls.
Myorkas was already impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, although chuck Schumer (in an illegal move) simply did not allow a trial. These are just more grounds for impeachment.
If Trump wins Myorkas should be charged with crimes.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:52 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 86 words, total size 1 kb.
November 04, 2024
U.S. Tax Dollars Flying in Illegals
Timothy Birdnow
Your tax dollars at work.
At least $81.7 million in U.S.… pic.twitter.com/8FZYzmrYu1
— House Judiciary GOP (@JudiciaryGOP)
Your tax dollars at work.
At least $81.7 million in U.S.… pic.twitter.com/8FZYzmrYu1
— House Judiciary GOP (@JudiciaryGOP)
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:04 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
Another Day, Another Twisting of Trump's Words
Timothy Birdnow
Having just failed to gin up outrage at Donald Trump by selectively editing his comments to make it appear he wanted to kill Liz Chaney with a firing squad, the media is now claiming Trump said he hoped the media would get shot
This just a day before the general election.
From the most biased ABC News article:
Doesn't this seem like a strange comment to make? The media is claiming Trump is saying THEY are his bulletproof glass but the context could equally suggest he is saying the people in attendance are his glass, his shield. That he pointed roughly in the direction where the press were in attendance - something impossible NOT to do as the press was in the crowd - never occurs to these curs. Actually I'm sure it did but fairness and acuracy do not enter into the picture with the media.
I've been hunting for the full context of this statement but cannot find anything except media hacks using the same snippet and not providing the whole comment.
Or there is this interpretation by Trump's people:
"Falsely claimed"? And they know that how? And we are to believe them why? After repeated twisting of Trump's words, and after their taking him out of context as late as just a few days ago who is it that is more likely to make false claims?
In fact Trump probably did mean to say the press was in danger as they were up front in the splash zone if Trump was hit and in the line of fire if not. And the basic point was Trump STILL isn't getting proper security from the government. Seems that point was lost on the radicals.
Why shouldn't Trump say he "wouldn't mind so much" given the way these same POS's have smeared and abused him? He wouldn't be human if he didn't harbor some animosity. So he joked a little while discussing a very serious issue - the security of the former and potentially future President of the United States.
I hope the public is now wise to the fact the media cannot tell the truth about Mr. Trump, that everything they say about him is a damnable lie. But sadly many will hear this and say "that SOB Trump is at it again!" when in fact it's the media that is at it again. And this just before election day.
In 1964 the U.S. Suprme Court gave the leftist media a get-out-of-jail-free card in their ruling New York Times v Sullivan. Essentially the radical Warren Court said that you have to prove malice aforethought and not just incorrect information; you have to prove they knowingly slandered someone and did so intentionally. It is so high a bar that the burden of proof is never met and so media gets away with saying the most ridiculous lies. (All except conservative media; Tucker Carlson was fired by Fox when they agreed to pay Dominion Voting a huge chunk of change without even trying to fight it in court, where they almost unquestionably would have won.)
Congress can probably remedy this, and most assuredly the Supreme Court could revisit the ruling and overturn it. Somebody needs to go after Sullivan.
The media should not be able to lie and distort the news for the political benefit of one and only one party.
Having just failed to gin up outrage at Donald Trump by selectively editing his comments to make it appear he wanted to kill Liz Chaney with a firing squad, the media is now claiming Trump said he hoped the media would get shot
This just a day before the general election.
From the most biased ABC News article:
"I have this piece of glass here, but all we have really over here is the fake news. And to get me, somebody would have to shoot through the fake news. And I don't mind that so much," he said at the event, just two days before Election Day.
Trump joked that such a shooting could break out "any minute now."
"They're my glass. See? Those people are my glass,” he said, pointing to the press.
Trump joked that such a shooting could break out "any minute now."
"They're my glass. See? Those people are my glass,” he said, pointing to the press.
Doesn't this seem like a strange comment to make? The media is claiming Trump is saying THEY are his bulletproof glass but the context could equally suggest he is saying the people in attendance are his glass, his shield. That he pointed roughly in the direction where the press were in attendance - something impossible NOT to do as the press was in the crowd - never occurs to these curs. Actually I'm sure it did but fairness and acuracy do not enter into the picture with the media.
I've been hunting for the full context of this statement but cannot find anything except media hacks using the same snippet and not providing the whole comment.
Or there is this interpretation by Trump's people:
Also responding to the comment, campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung falsely claimed Trump had said "nothing to do with the Media being harmed."
"There can be no other interpretation of what was said. He was actually looking out for their welfare, far more than his own," Cheung said.
Cheung falsely claimed Trump was actually "stating that the Media was in danger" and that they "should have had a glass protective shield, also."
"There can be no other interpretation of what was said. He was actually looking out for their welfare, far more than his own," Cheung said.
Cheung falsely claimed Trump was actually "stating that the Media was in danger" and that they "should have had a glass protective shield, also."
However, in both footage and official transcripts from the event, it is evident that Trump explicitly stated he would not "mind that so much" if reporters were shot, and laughed as his supporters cheered at his remark.
"Falsely claimed"? And they know that how? And we are to believe them why? After repeated twisting of Trump's words, and after their taking him out of context as late as just a few days ago who is it that is more likely to make false claims?
In fact Trump probably did mean to say the press was in danger as they were up front in the splash zone if Trump was hit and in the line of fire if not. And the basic point was Trump STILL isn't getting proper security from the government. Seems that point was lost on the radicals.
Why shouldn't Trump say he "wouldn't mind so much" given the way these same POS's have smeared and abused him? He wouldn't be human if he didn't harbor some animosity. So he joked a little while discussing a very serious issue - the security of the former and potentially future President of the United States.
I hope the public is now wise to the fact the media cannot tell the truth about Mr. Trump, that everything they say about him is a damnable lie. But sadly many will hear this and say "that SOB Trump is at it again!" when in fact it's the media that is at it again. And this just before election day.
In 1964 the U.S. Suprme Court gave the leftist media a get-out-of-jail-free card in their ruling New York Times v Sullivan. Essentially the radical Warren Court said that you have to prove malice aforethought and not just incorrect information; you have to prove they knowingly slandered someone and did so intentionally. It is so high a bar that the burden of proof is never met and so media gets away with saying the most ridiculous lies. (All except conservative media; Tucker Carlson was fired by Fox when they agreed to pay Dominion Voting a huge chunk of change without even trying to fight it in court, where they almost unquestionably would have won.)
Congress can probably remedy this, and most assuredly the Supreme Court could revisit the ruling and overturn it. Somebody needs to go after Sullivan.
The media should not be able to lie and distort the news for the political benefit of one and only one party.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:48 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 753 words, total size 5 kb.
Ukraine Running Out of Troops
Timothy Birdnow
The Ukranians are saying they need 500,000 new troops or they will lose.
Roman Kostenko, secretary of the parliamentary defense committee warned that they were out of troops and will need a major influx of new recuits. Naturally they don't have anyone left to recruit or draft.
Which means.....
Yes, they will soon be begging the West to send in troops. And with the North Koreans sending in troops this war has now become an international effort, not just a war between two states. So how long before the war hawks begin the push for NATO to send in forces?
This thing is starting to spiral out of control. If Harris wins it could be WWIII. Only Trump will de-escalate this and demand a diplomatic solution, something that could have been achieved before a million people died.
But then the elites in the West wanted to bleed Russia dry. And they have to a large degree. Russia may win this war, but it will be a pyrric victory as they will be bankrupted by it and the international bankers will pick the bones of the Russian Federation as they always intended, as they tried to do (and largely did) when the Soviet Union fell.
So a million people had to die in the process. Well, you can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs...
Meanwhile if NATO troops intervene this assured all-out war and probably the use of tactical nukes. China will get into it too. We could all wind up dead. There was a time Democrats in this country worried about nuclear war, yet strangely now they don't care a bit about it.
Russia has a larger nuclear arsenal than does the U.S. and it is much more modern, being built around 2005 while most of our weapons go back to the Reagan buildup of the '80's.
The Russians also have all sorts of new and nasty stuff; supersonic missiles, a submarine that could destroy the entirety of the British Islands, satellite killers that can take out our command and control. If we go down that road we may not like what we find.
Now would be a good time to buy some remote land and build a cabin with an underground bunker.
The Ukranians are saying they need 500,000 new troops or they will lose.
Roman Kostenko, secretary of the parliamentary defense committee warned that they were out of troops and will need a major influx of new recuits. Naturally they don't have anyone left to recruit or draft.
Which means.....
Yes, they will soon be begging the West to send in troops. And with the North Koreans sending in troops this war has now become an international effort, not just a war between two states. So how long before the war hawks begin the push for NATO to send in forces?
This thing is starting to spiral out of control. If Harris wins it could be WWIII. Only Trump will de-escalate this and demand a diplomatic solution, something that could have been achieved before a million people died.
But then the elites in the West wanted to bleed Russia dry. And they have to a large degree. Russia may win this war, but it will be a pyrric victory as they will be bankrupted by it and the international bankers will pick the bones of the Russian Federation as they always intended, as they tried to do (and largely did) when the Soviet Union fell.
So a million people had to die in the process. Well, you can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs...
Meanwhile if NATO troops intervene this assured all-out war and probably the use of tactical nukes. China will get into it too. We could all wind up dead. There was a time Democrats in this country worried about nuclear war, yet strangely now they don't care a bit about it.
Russia has a larger nuclear arsenal than does the U.S. and it is much more modern, being built around 2005 while most of our weapons go back to the Reagan buildup of the '80's.
The Russians also have all sorts of new and nasty stuff; supersonic missiles, a submarine that could destroy the entirety of the British Islands, satellite killers that can take out our command and control. If we go down that road we may not like what we find.
Now would be a good time to buy some remote land and build a cabin with an underground bunker.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:11 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 382 words, total size 2 kb.
<< Page 1 of 848 >>
66kb generated in CPU 0.06, elapsed 0.6464 seconds.
42 queries taking 0.635 seconds, 217 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
42 queries taking 0.635 seconds, 217 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
