September 30, 2025
Winds of the Apocalypse
Timothy Birdnow
Just another tantalizing clue that we are getting ready for war with the Russians.
Mystery fleet of US Air Force tankers crossing Atlantic stirs echoes of Iran strike ahead of secret military meeting
"Our research shows we will lose no more than 40 million tops"
Gen. Turgis from Dr. Strangelove
Just another tantalizing clue that we are getting ready for war with the Russians.
Mystery fleet of US Air Force tankers crossing Atlantic stirs echoes of Iran strike ahead of secret military meeting
"Our research shows we will lose no more than 40 million tops"
Gen. Turgis from Dr. Strangelove
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:49 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
Judge Royce Makes the Wrong Choice
Timothy Birdnow
Judge Royce Lamberth strikes again!
Trump Admin Blocked From Cleaning House At Voice Of America
Yes, the judge who has repeatedly dogged President Trump (one of them anyway) has done it again, telling the President he can't fire anti-American leftists using the Voice of America to promote their vile philosophy.
FTA:
I've looked and looked but never found any clause in the Constitution guaranteeing a right to keep your job with the Federal Government. I'd like the Hon. Dufus here to show me where it's at.
At any rate Lamberth is a Republican but a RINO and has blocked Trump repeatedly on such issues.
Judge Royce Lamberth strikes again!
Trump Admin Blocked From Cleaning House At Voice Of America
Yes, the judge who has repeatedly dogged President Trump (one of them anyway) has done it again, telling the President he can't fire anti-American leftists using the Voice of America to promote their vile philosophy.
FTA:
U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth blocked Acting USAGM CEO Kari Lake’s plan to lay off 532 employees while litigation over the case proceeds. Most of the employees who were set to be terminated on September 30 worked for Voice of America, a taxpayer-funded international media outlet that Lake has described as "rotten to the core” and "anti-American.”
"The Reduction in Force announced by Defendant Lake on or about August 29, 2025, is SUSPENDED and may NOT be implemented, effectuated, or completed in any way,” Lamberth wrote.
Lake said that the firings were necessary to "help reduce the federal bureaucracy, improve agency service, and save the American people more of their hard-earned money.”
USAGM operates other networks, such as Radio Free Europe and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks.
"The Reduction in Force announced by Defendant Lake on or about August 29, 2025, is SUSPENDED and may NOT be implemented, effectuated, or completed in any way,” Lamberth wrote.
Lake said that the firings were necessary to "help reduce the federal bureaucracy, improve agency service, and save the American people more of their hard-earned money.”
USAGM operates other networks, such as Radio Free Europe and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks.
I've looked and looked but never found any clause in the Constitution guaranteeing a right to keep your job with the Federal Government. I'd like the Hon. Dufus here to show me where it's at.
At any rate Lamberth is a Republican but a RINO and has blocked Trump repeatedly on such issues.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:46 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 239 words, total size 2 kb.
The NSA Report
Timothy Birdnow
All about the spying done by Obama on his political opponenents and his abuse of his office for political gain.
The NSAReport No One Has Ever Seen
I won't excerpt it - read it for yourself. Eye opening but we all knew it.
All about the spying done by Obama on his political opponenents and his abuse of his office for political gain.
The NSAReport No One Has Ever Seen
I won't excerpt it - read it for yourself. Eye opening but we all knew it.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:26 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
The Eve of Destruction
Timothy Birdnow
Maybe there is something to the "Trump has gone mad" mantra from the Left after all.
U.S. Special Envoy for Ukraine Keith Kellogg Says President Trump Has Authorized NATO Strikes Against Moscow
From Conservative Treehouse:
That would mean doomsday, ragnarok, armageddon, the end of days. Has he completely lost his marbles? Or is this a rather desperate bluff?
Sundance says what I am thinking:
He's right although it's more than just economics and debt and whatnot; it's about the internationalist dream, the dream of the folks at Davos and the World Economic Forum and the fools who brought us the European Union. It is about the creation of a "rules based order" or as we call it the New World Order, with world government and international socialism. The Europeans have long dreamt of this, especially afer the two world wars and the Cold War, and Russia forms it's own power block outside of the corrupting influence of the European elites. They want to remedy that situation. so they seek to exhaust and destroy the power of Moscow (which itself seeks power but in the old fashioned way).
And the European elites are crazy enough to think they can get away with this. Trump has, until now, been the adult in the room.
I once saw the musical Cabaret at the Fox Theatre in St. Louis. There was a line in the show that was pertinent to this situation:
(I paraphrase) "Berlin is like a bunch of children in a basement egging each other on to crazier and crazier things and wishing an adult would come down to stop them." (I don't know if this was the exact line but it's close enough.)
That's basically what Europe has been doing for some time now. It has been the U.S. that has restrained them. (BTW the U.S. has been doing the work of the Lord in restraining the coming of the AntiChrist and Armageddon by being the adult "he who restrains" as is mentioned in 2 Thessalonians 2:6–7.) But America has slowly turned away from God and has had her candle sticks removed from her lamp stands and now no longer restrains the forces that will bring doom.)
If Trump gives the go-ahead to attack Moscow, even indirectly, he is opening the door to nuclear war.
In fact,this is a most frightening time as almost all of the Biblical prophecies of the end times are present and could fall in on us at any second.
But even if one does not believe in the Bible, or in prophecy, or in God for that matter simple logic should tell us this is the most dangerous situation we've been in since the Cuban Missile Crisis, and perhaps even more dangerous than that. We are balanced on a knife's edge and the President has just turned on a big fan.
BTW Keith Kellogg was and is a liberal and internationalist. He should never have been appointted to that position.
Perhaps Moscow won't launch if the Ukrainians use our weapons with our blessibg, but the chances are good they will at least respond in kind. What will we do then? If Russia strikes Poland or the Zech Republic - or Germany - we will have to retaliate. Then the big one comes.
This is a time for prayer.
Maybe there is something to the "Trump has gone mad" mantra from the Left after all.
U.S. Special Envoy for Ukraine Keith Kellogg Says President Trump Has Authorized NATO Strikes Against Moscow
From Conservative Treehouse:
To wit, President Donald Trump has authorized NATO member states to deploy offensive missile systems into non-NATO Ukraine, provided by the U.S. In the latest development, U.S. Special Envoy for Ukraine General Keith Kellogg has announced Ukraine has the authority to launch those missile systems deep into Russia, including Moscow.
According to General Kellogg, President Trump is authorizing NATO to strike Moscow with U.S. missiles, launched from Ukraine. How is Ukraine not a proxy war between NATO and Russia.
According to General Kellogg, President Trump is authorizing NATO to strike Moscow with U.S. missiles, launched from Ukraine. How is Ukraine not a proxy war between NATO and Russia.
That would mean doomsday, ragnarok, armageddon, the end of days. Has he completely lost his marbles? Or is this a rather desperate bluff?
Sundance says what I am thinking:
Look at this issue from the perspective of Russian President Vladimir Putin.
The U.S. provides the missiles. The U.S. approves the missile locations in Ukraine. The U.S. authorizes the targets of the missiles from their location. NATO provides the satellite guidance system. Ukraine targets Moscow and launches the missiles.
The U.S. provides the missiles. The U.S. approves the missile locations in Ukraine. The U.S. authorizes the targets of the missiles from their location. NATO provides the satellite guidance system. Ukraine targets Moscow and launches the missiles.
How is President Trump not directly responsible for a NATO proxy war against Russia?
The only way for President Trump to make the ‘accountability monkey’ jump now, is to exit NATO.
The reason why the EU member states of NATO want escalated war with Russia is financial and economic. Through policy and ideology, the EU/NATO members have walked themselves into an economic dead end. They are out of assets to leverage. The only way out for the EU/NATO leadership is to create a war to erase debt, expand assets and reset the economics.
The only way for President Trump to make the ‘accountability monkey’ jump now, is to exit NATO.
The reason why the EU member states of NATO want escalated war with Russia is financial and economic. Through policy and ideology, the EU/NATO members have walked themselves into an economic dead end. They are out of assets to leverage. The only way out for the EU/NATO leadership is to create a war to erase debt, expand assets and reset the economics.
He's right although it's more than just economics and debt and whatnot; it's about the internationalist dream, the dream of the folks at Davos and the World Economic Forum and the fools who brought us the European Union. It is about the creation of a "rules based order" or as we call it the New World Order, with world government and international socialism. The Europeans have long dreamt of this, especially afer the two world wars and the Cold War, and Russia forms it's own power block outside of the corrupting influence of the European elites. They want to remedy that situation. so they seek to exhaust and destroy the power of Moscow (which itself seeks power but in the old fashioned way).
And the European elites are crazy enough to think they can get away with this. Trump has, until now, been the adult in the room.
I once saw the musical Cabaret at the Fox Theatre in St. Louis. There was a line in the show that was pertinent to this situation:
(I paraphrase) "Berlin is like a bunch of children in a basement egging each other on to crazier and crazier things and wishing an adult would come down to stop them." (I don't know if this was the exact line but it's close enough.)
That's basically what Europe has been doing for some time now. It has been the U.S. that has restrained them. (BTW the U.S. has been doing the work of the Lord in restraining the coming of the AntiChrist and Armageddon by being the adult "he who restrains" as is mentioned in 2 Thessalonians 2:6–7.) But America has slowly turned away from God and has had her candle sticks removed from her lamp stands and now no longer restrains the forces that will bring doom.)
If Trump gives the go-ahead to attack Moscow, even indirectly, he is opening the door to nuclear war.
In fact,this is a most frightening time as almost all of the Biblical prophecies of the end times are present and could fall in on us at any second.
But even if one does not believe in the Bible, or in prophecy, or in God for that matter simple logic should tell us this is the most dangerous situation we've been in since the Cuban Missile Crisis, and perhaps even more dangerous than that. We are balanced on a knife's edge and the President has just turned on a big fan.
BTW Keith Kellogg was and is a liberal and internationalist. He should never have been appointted to that position.
Perhaps Moscow won't launch if the Ukrainians use our weapons with our blessibg, but the chances are good they will at least respond in kind. What will we do then? If Russia strikes Poland or the Zech Republic - or Germany - we will have to retaliate. Then the big one comes.
This is a time for prayer.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:22 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 779 words, total size 5 kb.
The Devil and Jon Stewart
Timothy Birdnow
It is a terrible thing to face the realization that what you truly believed your whole life has turned out to be false and that YOU are actually on the side of evil.
Jon Stewart Tries to Downplay Motives, Wonders if Shooters are F-ing with us
Ri-ight. These shooters were fully prepared to die a horrible death for their cause but they took the time to frame the Left. And their social media was set up for years to frame the left. And the Kirk shooter was banging a dude in a dress and an animal costume to frame the left.
Stewart cannot face the fact that it is his side full of animus and hatred.
The mirthless comedian/pundit said:
The very fact that they are all writing on bullet casings (not bullets as perhaps Stewart believes) is proof of the monolithic nature of leftism and how they all suffer group-think. Oh, and it IS perhaps the best way to get their point across as those casings will be held in evidence and there is no way to misinterpret or to hide or lose them.
Stewart then said:
At least he realizes the internet culture IS psychotic, but he fails to realize why. It's because it's a LEFTIST internet culture. I suppose he doesn't reemember the Reign of Terror in France after the Revolution, nor the monstrous murder spree of the bolsheviks or in China after the Revolution.
I suppose he doesn't remember Trotsky, who was murdered by Stalin's agents in Mexico? In fact there are assassinations all the time, and especially by the Left.
Stewart then played a clip from CNN:
Personal insults are very different from accusing the other side of being Nazis, as the article points out; one must kill Nazis because they will start a new holocaust if not stopped. But this statement is also just plain stupid; anyone remember Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton? Burr killed Hamilton in a duel over insults from the latter. And during the Revolution there were all sorts of angry mobs going after British apologists with ropes, or with tar and feathers. Britain's governor of Massachussets Thomas Hutchinson had his hom burned down and was pursued with people with rope who wished to hang him. This is nothing new.
Anyone remember Abraham Lincoln? James Garfield?
The reason it's worse now is that every crazy in America can communicate instantaneously and they feed each-otther's delusions. But in the end this is nothing new - neither here nor anywhere else.
Stewart is trying to triangulate - to position himself as a "centrist" when in fact he is justifying the unjustifiable. He cannot face the fact that his side is just evil.
It is a terrible thing to face the realization that what you truly believed your whole life has turned out to be false and that YOU are actually on the side of evil.
Jon Stewart Tries to Downplay Motives, Wonders if Shooters are F-ing with us
Ri-ight. These shooters were fully prepared to die a horrible death for their cause but they took the time to frame the Left. And their social media was set up for years to frame the left. And the Kirk shooter was banging a dude in a dress and an animal costume to frame the left.
Stewart cannot face the fact that it is his side full of animus and hatred.
The mirthless comedian/pundit said:
"Doesn’t anybody think it’s [bleep] weird that these people just started writing on bullets all of a sudden like that’s the most effective way to get out their deeply held political beliefs? ‘Anti-ICE.’ Nuff said. Or is there the slightest possibility that these people are [bleep] with us.
The very fact that they are all writing on bullet casings (not bullets as perhaps Stewart believes) is proof of the monolithic nature of leftism and how they all suffer group-think. Oh, and it IS perhaps the best way to get their point across as those casings will be held in evidence and there is no way to misinterpret or to hide or lose them.
Stewart then said:
"What kind of [bleep] psychotic internet culture—what’s happening? Can’t we just go back to the cinnamon challenge? Is that so hard? What is wrong with you people? Look, we would definitely have a healthier political discourse if we weren’t constantly calling each other fascists and communists and Nazis. But we’re the only place in the world where this shit happens all the time. But we are not the only place in the world that name calls.
At least he realizes the internet culture IS psychotic, but he fails to realize why. It's because it's a LEFTIST internet culture. I suppose he doesn't reemember the Reign of Terror in France after the Revolution, nor the monstrous murder spree of the bolsheviks or in China after the Revolution.
I suppose he doesn't remember Trotsky, who was murdered by Stalin's agents in Mexico? In fact there are assassinations all the time, and especially by the Left.
Stewart then played a clip from CNN:
"John Quincy Adams taking aim at [Andrew] Jackson, asserting that Jackson didn’t know how to spell, was too uneducated to become president, while newspapers portrayed his wife, Rachel, as a short, fat dumpling.”
Personal insults are very different from accusing the other side of being Nazis, as the article points out; one must kill Nazis because they will start a new holocaust if not stopped. But this statement is also just plain stupid; anyone remember Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton? Burr killed Hamilton in a duel over insults from the latter. And during the Revolution there were all sorts of angry mobs going after British apologists with ropes, or with tar and feathers. Britain's governor of Massachussets Thomas Hutchinson had his hom burned down and was pursued with people with rope who wished to hang him. This is nothing new.
Anyone remember Abraham Lincoln? James Garfield?
The reason it's worse now is that every crazy in America can communicate instantaneously and they feed each-otther's delusions. But in the end this is nothing new - neither here nor anywhere else.
Stewart is trying to triangulate - to position himself as a "centrist" when in fact he is justifying the unjustifiable. He cannot face the fact that his side is just evil.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:54 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 609 words, total size 4 kb.
Why Women Should not be Cops
Timothy Birdnow
I've long said it; female cops are a terrible idea. In the end they are forced to rely on other - male - police officers or have to use lethal force where one good knock on the noggin of the perp would finish the matter.
Two female cops can’t subdue male perp… ‘300-pound’ citizen steps in to finish the job…
We keep playing this little game of radical egalitarianism where we pretend there is no difference between people and that there should be no barriers to doing anything one wishes to do, even if that person is not suited to said occupation. Women are smaller, generally weaker and slower than men. In fact, Israel, which needs soldiers more than any other country, stopped using women in combat roles precisely because of this fact.
we see this in other areas of life as well. The most obvious has been this push towards "transgenderism" in which men get to compete against women in sports. There are so many others, like people without legs getting jobs that require a good bit of walking, or whatnot.
This is the Liberal idea of freedom, which means being free to do as you please no matter if reality is against you or not. It's the radical notion of freedom that says there should be no limitations on a person, not from society, not from onesself, and not even from God. It's a sort of insanity. And how does it express itself? A "free society" to a leftist is one where people can do any crazy thing and is only constrained by law, the guardrails on their crazy-train racetrack. People do not restrain themselves, do not actually control their own destiny by self-control, but rather society plays along with every giggling and drooling notion that pops into the heads of humankind and the only thing that stops total chaos is government control and power. Hence it is a totalitarian society whose aim is to let the insane wander around loose and forces the sane to act as though there is nothing called reality.
Conservatives, on the other hand, believe in a concrete reality, one established by God, the goal of which is to be in harmony with. How you do that is YOUR business but it requires YOU control yourself, accept what God has wrought, and work within that framework. Happiness, we believe, comes from being where you are supposed to be and doing what you are supposed to do. Anarchy is not freedom in our view.
So women cops, and women soldiers, are a rebellion against that fundamental principle. Oh, they are fine in support roles, but just because some women WANT to do those jobs doesn't mean they CAN do those jobs. Inevitably allowances have to be made.
I am mindful of Congresswoman Maize Hirono who recently said women in the military shouldn't have to do chinups. Why not? It's part of basic training and if they want to serve tehy shouldn't have such allowances made for them, any more than any other soldier. A man with bad vision shouldn't expect the rifle range to spot him points, should it? (I think it was Hirono who said it, but it could have been another Democrat, like Fauxcahontas. I couldn't find the quote with a web search despite it being quite recent.)
At any rate we have come to believe that what the individual wants the individual should get no matter how much it imposes on others. Rights impose no obligation on others except that the others not interfere with those rights for no good reason.
Women cops often have something to prove too and can be the most disagreeable passive-aggressive scolds you will ever meet. I once got pulled over for driving like two miles an hour over the speed limit in a rural part of Missouri and mainly she pulled me over for not wearing a seatbelt (which she couldn't do in Missouri; she had to have another violation, hence the speIeding accusation.) She was all over me about not wearing the belt. I did what I do whenever pulled over, spoke in matter of fact, terse statements; it's a big game, after all, and I see no reason for playing it. I finally had to tell her "either give me the ticket and let me be on my way or don't" and she finally stopped harangueing me. She wanted to show me how tough she was and was disappointed I wasn't fighting her.
That is often what you get from women cops; they want to prove they are as tough as any man. But a man wouldn't just act tought like that, by and large (yes, there are some very bad actors on police forces who do but that's another story.) When it was obvious I wasn't a trouble-maker the male cop would have just said "the law says you need to buckle up. please do so" and probably wouldn't even have given me a ticket (actually he wouldn't have pulled me over at all.) In Missouri the only reason we have a seat belt law is because the Federal government forced it on the state, which was one of the last to pass it, and they did so in a way that it is hardly ever enforced.
At any rate women cops are a bad idea. If you are going to be a cop you need to be able to physically restrain someone without killing them with your service weapon.
I've long said it; female cops are a terrible idea. In the end they are forced to rely on other - male - police officers or have to use lethal force where one good knock on the noggin of the perp would finish the matter.
Two female cops can’t subdue male perp… ‘300-pound’ citizen steps in to finish the job…
We keep playing this little game of radical egalitarianism where we pretend there is no difference between people and that there should be no barriers to doing anything one wishes to do, even if that person is not suited to said occupation. Women are smaller, generally weaker and slower than men. In fact, Israel, which needs soldiers more than any other country, stopped using women in combat roles precisely because of this fact.
we see this in other areas of life as well. The most obvious has been this push towards "transgenderism" in which men get to compete against women in sports. There are so many others, like people without legs getting jobs that require a good bit of walking, or whatnot.
This is the Liberal idea of freedom, which means being free to do as you please no matter if reality is against you or not. It's the radical notion of freedom that says there should be no limitations on a person, not from society, not from onesself, and not even from God. It's a sort of insanity. And how does it express itself? A "free society" to a leftist is one where people can do any crazy thing and is only constrained by law, the guardrails on their crazy-train racetrack. People do not restrain themselves, do not actually control their own destiny by self-control, but rather society plays along with every giggling and drooling notion that pops into the heads of humankind and the only thing that stops total chaos is government control and power. Hence it is a totalitarian society whose aim is to let the insane wander around loose and forces the sane to act as though there is nothing called reality.
Conservatives, on the other hand, believe in a concrete reality, one established by God, the goal of which is to be in harmony with. How you do that is YOUR business but it requires YOU control yourself, accept what God has wrought, and work within that framework. Happiness, we believe, comes from being where you are supposed to be and doing what you are supposed to do. Anarchy is not freedom in our view.
So women cops, and women soldiers, are a rebellion against that fundamental principle. Oh, they are fine in support roles, but just because some women WANT to do those jobs doesn't mean they CAN do those jobs. Inevitably allowances have to be made.
I am mindful of Congresswoman Maize Hirono who recently said women in the military shouldn't have to do chinups. Why not? It's part of basic training and if they want to serve tehy shouldn't have such allowances made for them, any more than any other soldier. A man with bad vision shouldn't expect the rifle range to spot him points, should it? (I think it was Hirono who said it, but it could have been another Democrat, like Fauxcahontas. I couldn't find the quote with a web search despite it being quite recent.)
At any rate we have come to believe that what the individual wants the individual should get no matter how much it imposes on others. Rights impose no obligation on others except that the others not interfere with those rights for no good reason.
Women cops often have something to prove too and can be the most disagreeable passive-aggressive scolds you will ever meet. I once got pulled over for driving like two miles an hour over the speed limit in a rural part of Missouri and mainly she pulled me over for not wearing a seatbelt (which she couldn't do in Missouri; she had to have another violation, hence the speIeding accusation.) She was all over me about not wearing the belt. I did what I do whenever pulled over, spoke in matter of fact, terse statements; it's a big game, after all, and I see no reason for playing it. I finally had to tell her "either give me the ticket and let me be on my way or don't" and she finally stopped harangueing me. She wanted to show me how tough she was and was disappointed I wasn't fighting her.
That is often what you get from women cops; they want to prove they are as tough as any man. But a man wouldn't just act tought like that, by and large (yes, there are some very bad actors on police forces who do but that's another story.) When it was obvious I wasn't a trouble-maker the male cop would have just said "the law says you need to buckle up. please do so" and probably wouldn't even have given me a ticket (actually he wouldn't have pulled me over at all.) In Missouri the only reason we have a seat belt law is because the Federal government forced it on the state, which was one of the last to pass it, and they did so in a way that it is hardly ever enforced.
At any rate women cops are a bad idea. If you are going to be a cop you need to be able to physically restrain someone without killing them with your service weapon.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:08 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 926 words, total size 5 kb.
Secret Service Vehicle Torched
Timothy Birdnow
A fire started in the back seat of a Secret Service Vehicle right around the corner from the White House as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was about to meet with President Trump in the Oval Haha Hotel.
If the Secret Service can't stop Antifa or whoever from torching one of their own vehicles just outside of the most secure building on Earth what use are they?
A fire started in the back seat of a Secret Service Vehicle right around the corner from the White House as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was about to meet with President Trump in the Oval Haha Hotel.
If the Secret Service can't stop Antifa or whoever from torching one of their own vehicles just outside of the most secure building on Earth what use are they?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:31 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.
Timothy Birdnow
Speaking of negative examples of Christianity...
Pastor at Prominent Evangelical DC Church Says Charlie Kirk Was a Negative Example of Christianity
Judge not lest ye be judged, remember that?
Seems to me this pastor is more interested in friendship with the world than with God. He would not like me saying that yet feels free to criticize a man who has died and can no longer defend himself in the exact same manner.
Speaking of negative examples of Christianity...
Pastor at Prominent Evangelical DC Church Says Charlie Kirk Was a Negative Example of Christianity
Judge not lest ye be judged, remember that?
Seems to me this pastor is more interested in friendship with the world than with God. He would not like me saying that yet feels free to criticize a man who has died and can no longer defend himself in the exact same manner.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:14 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 75 words, total size 1 kb.
Autism and Tylenol
Timothy Birdnow
Here you go.
This is what Trump was referencing the other day about how the discovery that Tylenol is linked to autism may be a game-changer. And internal memos in the company suggest the manufacturer was fully aware of it.
Naturally, since Trump said it, the Left is in full denial, calling it junk science (even though it was a peer reviewed study conducted by the University of California, Los Angeles; University of Massachusetts Lowell; and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and funded by the National Cancer Institute. One pregnant young dimwit swallowed just about a whole bottle of Tylenol to prove Trump wrong and is in a coma with liver failure. She isn't expected to live (and her baby will probably die too.) That's how the Left rolls.
But Trump was right when he pointed out autism and aDHD are at epidemic levels, having increased by massive amounts in the last twenty or thirty years and that strongly suggests some environmental factor. What has changed in that time? Our air is cleaner, our water cleaner, etc. It probably is something we eat or drink. The use of Tylenol has grown by leaps and bounds, especially since doctors no longer want to give out stronger pain-killers.
At any rate it may be just one trigger of autism - there could be others. But it is likely one of them and if we can reduce autism and aspbergers and ADHD we would be well-served in doing so.
Here you go.
This is what Trump was referencing the other day about how the discovery that Tylenol is linked to autism may be a game-changer. And internal memos in the company suggest the manufacturer was fully aware of it.
Naturally, since Trump said it, the Left is in full denial, calling it junk science (even though it was a peer reviewed study conducted by the University of California, Los Angeles; University of Massachusetts Lowell; and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and funded by the National Cancer Institute. One pregnant young dimwit swallowed just about a whole bottle of Tylenol to prove Trump wrong and is in a coma with liver failure. She isn't expected to live (and her baby will probably die too.) That's how the Left rolls.
But Trump was right when he pointed out autism and aDHD are at epidemic levels, having increased by massive amounts in the last twenty or thirty years and that strongly suggests some environmental factor. What has changed in that time? Our air is cleaner, our water cleaner, etc. It probably is something we eat or drink. The use of Tylenol has grown by leaps and bounds, especially since doctors no longer want to give out stronger pain-killers.
At any rate it may be just one trigger of autism - there could be others. But it is likely one of them and if we can reduce autism and aspbergers and ADHD we would be well-served in doing so.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:55 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 253 words, total size 2 kb.
Microbes Need Nutrents to outgas CO2
Timothy Birdnow
One of the fundamental assumptions in the climate change hypothesis is that the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere stimulates a degree of warming which in turn leads to the release of carbon dioxide into the Earth's atmosphere as a result of microbes becoming more active and metabolizing more trapped carbon in the soil, thus further increasing atmosphereic carbon dioxide and leading to more warming.
This paper challenges that notion.
Researchers at North Carolina State University decided to study soil in warmer climates, and especially in areas which had been former agricultural regions. Most studies on soil outgassing have been conducted in the Arctic and assume the Arctic soil works the same way as does soil on the whole planet. The researcher's findings show it does not.
The scientists looked at new forest soil in what had been old cotton fields. Cotton tends to exhaust soil of nutrients, and the new forest is full of scrub which thrives in exhausted soil. What they found was that there was little carbon dioxide released from these soils because they lacked the proper nutrients to foster bacterial activity.
The bacteria need high carbon dioxide levels in the soil as well as other nutrients (like phosphorous). Warmth isn't all they need; they need FOOD.
So surface warming is not in itself a driver of outgassing of co2.
While this in no way destroys the concept of anthropogenic climate change it does suggest our understanding of the carbon cycle is woefully inadequate. It also suggests the climate sensitivity is less than what the IPCC estimates it to be. (Climate sensitivity is the term used to describe the roll of feedbacks in the climate; high sensitivity means a positive feedback where a minor effect like a modest rise in temperature or warming leads to a feedback loop greatly increasing that effect, while a low sensitivity means negative feedbacks which tamp it down. A great example of low sensitivity is on Mars, where a warming at the surface leads to an outgassing of carbon dioxide from the soil (because the soil holds frozen carbon dioxide - dry ice) which increases atmospheric pressure which leads to huge wind storms that blow up dust, blotting the sun, and cools the planet back down, to refreeze the atmosphere in the soil.) The IPCC has always assumed a rather high climate sensitivity, that the positive feedbacks all push planetary temperatures upward. Skeptics have all argued for much lower sensitivity (and use geological history to prove it.)
So this suggests a lower sensitivity than the IPCC believes. Warming alone won't cause outgassing; limitations in soil fertility reduces that.
Again, this isn't a smoking gun rebuttal of global warming alarmism, but it's just one more thread coming loose from the great tapestry the Gang Green has woven.
One of the fundamental assumptions in the climate change hypothesis is that the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere stimulates a degree of warming which in turn leads to the release of carbon dioxide into the Earth's atmosphere as a result of microbes becoming more active and metabolizing more trapped carbon in the soil, thus further increasing atmosphereic carbon dioxide and leading to more warming.
This paper challenges that notion.
Researchers at North Carolina State University decided to study soil in warmer climates, and especially in areas which had been former agricultural regions. Most studies on soil outgassing have been conducted in the Arctic and assume the Arctic soil works the same way as does soil on the whole planet. The researcher's findings show it does not.
The scientists looked at new forest soil in what had been old cotton fields. Cotton tends to exhaust soil of nutrients, and the new forest is full of scrub which thrives in exhausted soil. What they found was that there was little carbon dioxide released from these soils because they lacked the proper nutrients to foster bacterial activity.
The bacteria need high carbon dioxide levels in the soil as well as other nutrients (like phosphorous). Warmth isn't all they need; they need FOOD.
So surface warming is not in itself a driver of outgassing of co2.
While this in no way destroys the concept of anthropogenic climate change it does suggest our understanding of the carbon cycle is woefully inadequate. It also suggests the climate sensitivity is less than what the IPCC estimates it to be. (Climate sensitivity is the term used to describe the roll of feedbacks in the climate; high sensitivity means a positive feedback where a minor effect like a modest rise in temperature or warming leads to a feedback loop greatly increasing that effect, while a low sensitivity means negative feedbacks which tamp it down. A great example of low sensitivity is on Mars, where a warming at the surface leads to an outgassing of carbon dioxide from the soil (because the soil holds frozen carbon dioxide - dry ice) which increases atmospheric pressure which leads to huge wind storms that blow up dust, blotting the sun, and cools the planet back down, to refreeze the atmosphere in the soil.) The IPCC has always assumed a rather high climate sensitivity, that the positive feedbacks all push planetary temperatures upward. Skeptics have all argued for much lower sensitivity (and use geological history to prove it.)
So this suggests a lower sensitivity than the IPCC believes. Warming alone won't cause outgassing; limitations in soil fertility reduces that.
Again, this isn't a smoking gun rebuttal of global warming alarmism, but it's just one more thread coming loose from the great tapestry the Gang Green has woven.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:41 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 473 words, total size 3 kb.
September 29, 2025
SCOTUS to Decide if Trump can Fire Bureaucrats
Timothy Birdnow
The Suprme Court appears to be ready to give Trump the authority to actually control the regulatory bodies that have so hamstrung America.
Report: Trump Set for Massive Victory that Could Cripple Administrative State
SCOTUS says is revisiting the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, a landmark ruling that said Frankly Roosevelt couldn't fire a commissioner of the FTC, a bureaucracy that is supposed to be under the control of the executive branch.
President Trump is attempting to fire the Biden-appointed Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, who sued, arguing Humphrey said she could not be removed by the President.
SCOTUS recently declared the Federal Reserve a "quasi-private entity" and has yet to rule on Trump's attempt to remove Lisa Cook, the Federal Reserve head cookie.
If the Supreme Court rules in Trump's favor it likely will give him the power to systematically remove all of the entrenched bureaucrats who have held America in their iron grip.
The Suprme Court appears to be ready to give Trump the authority to actually control the regulatory bodies that have so hamstrung America.
Report: Trump Set for Massive Victory that Could Cripple Administrative State
SCOTUS says is revisiting the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, a landmark ruling that said Frankly Roosevelt couldn't fire a commissioner of the FTC, a bureaucracy that is supposed to be under the control of the executive branch.
President Trump is attempting to fire the Biden-appointed Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, who sued, arguing Humphrey said she could not be removed by the President.
SCOTUS recently declared the Federal Reserve a "quasi-private entity" and has yet to rule on Trump's attempt to remove Lisa Cook, the Federal Reserve head cookie.
If the Supreme Court rules in Trump's favor it likely will give him the power to systematically remove all of the entrenched bureaucrats who have held America in their iron grip.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:45 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 164 words, total size 1 kb.
Dhimmi Dearborn
Timothy Birdnow
It's way past time we start deporting these people.
Arabic-Speaking Dearborn Police Chief Declares "Hamdullah, Hamdullah,” Proudly Boasts That Muslim Officers Now Half of Police Force, Up From 3%
What is happening in Dearborn is illustrative of what happens once the Muslim population is in the majority.
This is how Islam spreads. It starts as a small minority in a population, then by the time it reaches 10% it begins demanding Sharia and oppresses the majority, who give in to have peace. Eventually it imposes it's will entirely and takes over. the non-Muslims are then second class citizens in their own homeland, and either must accept Dhimmi status or leave.
Dearborn is now in Dhimmi status.
It's way past time we start deporting these people.
Arabic-Speaking Dearborn Police Chief Declares "Hamdullah, Hamdullah,” Proudly Boasts That Muslim Officers Now Half of Police Force, Up From 3%
What is happening in Dearborn is illustrative of what happens once the Muslim population is in the majority.
Dearborn, Michigan’s police chief speaks in Arabic, saying "Hamdullah, Hamdullah, all praise is due to Allah.”
He’s also boasting about Dearborn’s police department going from 3% Islamic to 50%
The viral video of Dearborn Police Chief Issa Shahin praises the growing Muslim representation. The controversy intensifies ongoing tensions over mosque loudspeakers broadcasting the Islamic call to prayer, highlighting deep cultural and legal divides within the Dearborn community.
Amid the ongoing tensions in the city of Dearborn over mosque loudspeakers, a video of the police chief has gone viral, adding fuel to an already divisive debate over the use of outdoor loudspeakers for the Islamic call to prayer. The video shows Dearborn Police Chief Sa Shahin speaking at a public event, where he uses the Arabic phrase "Hamdullah, Hamdullah” and proudly notes that Muslim officers now make up 45 per cent of the city’s police force, up from just 3 per cent in earlier years.
WTF?! Dearborn, Michigan’s police chief is speaking in ARABIC, saying "Hamdullah, Hamdullah, all praise is due to Allah”
He’s also boasting about Dearborn’s police department going from 3% Islamic to 50%
Patriotic Michiganders: TAKE BACK YOUR STATE! pic.twitter.com/VNCCxP5iak
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) September 28, 2025
He’s also boasting about Dearborn’s police department going from 3% Islamic to 50%
The viral video of Dearborn Police Chief Issa Shahin praises the growing Muslim representation. The controversy intensifies ongoing tensions over mosque loudspeakers broadcasting the Islamic call to prayer, highlighting deep cultural and legal divides within the Dearborn community.
Amid the ongoing tensions in the city of Dearborn over mosque loudspeakers, a video of the police chief has gone viral, adding fuel to an already divisive debate over the use of outdoor loudspeakers for the Islamic call to prayer. The video shows Dearborn Police Chief Sa Shahin speaking at a public event, where he uses the Arabic phrase "Hamdullah, Hamdullah” and proudly notes that Muslim officers now make up 45 per cent of the city’s police force, up from just 3 per cent in earlier years.
WTF?! Dearborn, Michigan’s police chief is speaking in ARABIC, saying "Hamdullah, Hamdullah, all praise is due to Allah”
He’s also boasting about Dearborn’s police department going from 3% Islamic to 50%
Patriotic Michiganders: TAKE BACK YOUR STATE! pic.twitter.com/VNCCxP5iak
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) September 28, 2025
This is how Islam spreads. It starts as a small minority in a population, then by the time it reaches 10% it begins demanding Sharia and oppresses the majority, who give in to have peace. Eventually it imposes it's will entirely and takes over. the non-Muslims are then second class citizens in their own homeland, and either must accept Dhimmi status or leave.
Dearborn is now in Dhimmi status.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:30 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 319 words, total size 2 kb.
The University Witches
Timothy Birdnow
"Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,”
1 Corinthians 6:9
So how DARE a Catholic University promote the effeminization of men when the Bible makes it quite plain this is a thing that will lead to damnation?
Catholic university tells employees to add preferred pronouns to email signatures
From The College Fix:
So this female/woman/xchromosomer wants to just let people decide if they are men or women or furrries or whatnot. God isn't in control; we are! It is our right to decide if we are men or women, human or animal, etc. That is what she said here.
God made them male and female, according to Genesis; there was nothing about "gender fluidity" nor about our right to choose our own gender. it's patently clear.
The article continues:
If for some reason said faculty member needed to add a pronoun they are free to do so, but there is no reason to impose "chosen pronouncs" on people.
I would add this university also sponsors a "pride club" aka homosexual group. And has a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Center.
Not sure where Christ or the Holy Trinity or the Blessed Virgin Mary fit in with any of this.
But, but, but.... Isn't Christianity just about love and shouldn't Christians be trying to engage with people for their salvation?
Yes. And it is love that leads the Church to gently chastise the sinner, lest he orshe or xi wind up meeting the fate in the Corinthians quote. Love often requires us to do some hard things.
There is an old adage that says "the opposite of love isnot hate but indifference" and that is very true where sin is concerned. If you love a sinner you don't just let him skip merrily to Hell. You try to save that person. It is our duty to warn them thatwhat they are doing might seem right to them ("there is a way that seems right to a man but it leads to death") but in the end it will lead to ETERNAL suffering and despair.
But of course we've stopped believing in Hell because we don't accept that God is all just as well as all merciful. We like the mercy end of it but not the judge, so we simply dismiss the judge. God becomes a rather cartoonish character who we can kick around and He'll just come back with open arms. But that isn't the case at all and just a casual observation of reality tells us God will in fact punish sins. We see the results of sin all around us, the horrible suffering and misery caused by it.
So, will Charles Manson go to Heaven? It could be argued that he didn't make himself what he was and so should be let in. That's what happens when you have simple blind love without any sort of reason attached. EVERYONE, Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Jeffrey Dahmer, John Waybe Gayce, etc. must be let into Heaven by this standard. Heaven wouldn't be Heaven long if that were so. It would be at beast like Earth, and actually would be more like Hell.
And this is fair because these people all had choices and chose to do evil. It's who they want to be and they are where they want to go.
It is the job of the Christian to warn those headed down this path, not to judge them but to warn them and to work to get them to repent. Paul gave us the template; he said we are to quietly speak with an open sinner and if they still won't repent bring Church elders, and if they still won't to cut them off,lest their sin infect others. Sin is a contagion, a disease.
Christianity has forgotten that and now everyone thinks it's our duty to embrace people who obstinately persist in evil and sinful behavior. As a result we no longer believe in Sin at all; it's just an "alternate lifestyle" or a phase. "God loves the Sinner" they say. But like the father of the Prodigal Son He is willing to let them go if that's what they want. It IS our job to offer love and forgiveness, but they must ASK for forgiveness first.
Does a wife forgive her husband if he has an affair? She might if he is truly repntant and cuts off the relationship. She never will, indeed cannot, if he says he's sorry but he's going to keep doing it. If she tries to keep the relationship alive despite his affair it will never work and we all know that. As the Bible says, we cannot serve two masters, nor can we be in a marriage with someone with a divided loyalty. Some things require committment.
God is like that. He does love everyone and wishes everyone would repent, but He set up the rules long before the foundations of the world were laid and if people break the rules out of weakness, or even willfully but ask forgiveness He will grant it. But how do you forgive when someone isn't sorry and plans to keep doing bad things?
This isn't that hard to understand. A glutton who eats huge amounts of food will grow enormously fat, and when such a person dies we do not think God was somehow unfair in letting the person have a heart attack. We think rather thatit was a shame the man or woman didn't get their diet under control. But they knew the risks and did nothing about it. Yes, many suffer from weight problems, myself included. Many are forever trying to lose weight, and in many cases it's not their fault exactly. We try to help them with drugs, with exercise programs, with emotional support. But in the end they have to WANT to lose the weight or they will just keep growing. That is how people wind up weighing 600 lbs and have to be buried at age 28 in a piano case. In the end we have to accept their choice. I remember a television show about morbidly obese people and the mother of such a man said it "he's committing slow suicide". But how do you stop that?
How do you deal with any of the seven deadly sins? The wrathful and sullen don't want our love. Nether do the greedy. Ebeneazor Scrooge, in A Christmas Carole, had to be shown he was going to die and go to Hell before he repented of being such a jackass. Nobody ever drew him in with kind words and content-less forgiveness.
We have free will. God gave that to us lest he be a tyrant. But there are costs with free will.
Free will came as a gift, an act of love by God. If we choose to abuse it that is our right but we must bear the consequences. God would not be loving if that weren't so.
So this idea that we are somehow more loving by encouraging and nurturing sexual immorality and a willful rejection of reality is nonsense. It's the indifferent approach, not the loving.
BTW transgenderism is essentially the sin of witchcraft; an attempt to alter reality by an expression of will. Witches use potions - trans people use hormones. Witches chant, trans chant as well. Both believe you can appeal to some sort of outside force to alter the very bedrock of reality.
That's what this woman at this allegedly Catholic university has done here. she is essentially a witch with a PH.D.
"Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,”
1 Corinthians 6:9
So how DARE a Catholic University promote the effeminization of men when the Bible makes it quite plain this is a thing that will lead to damnation?
Catholic university tells employees to add preferred pronouns to email signatures
From The College Fix:
A private Catholic institution in Wisconsin has told its employees to add their preferred pronouns to their email signatures, according to an internal memo obtained by The College Fix.
Viterbo University in La Crosse, Wisc., recently sent an email to its employees announcing "a few small but important changes” to its email signature guidelines "to improve consistency, professionalism, and alignment with our updated university brand.”
The guidelines include telling employees not to include image files in email signatures, noting they can not only cause many technical issues but also that "most image files are not correctly labeled to meet ADA compliance requirements.”
The email, which used the subject line "ACTION REQUESTED: Updating email signatures and profile photos,” also asked employees to upload a professional photo to their profile or use a Viterbo logo for hospitality and branding purposes.
The Sept. 2 memo, sent by Viterbo’s Vice President for Marketing, Communications, and Enrollment, Erin Edlund, also gave employees an email signature template to follow that asked them to use either the Helvetica or Georgia font and included a prompt for pronouns.
First Last Name (pronouns: list yours here)
Viterbo University
Title | Department
555-555-5555
Office Room Number
She included her own pronouns of "she/her/hers” at the conclusion of the same email.
Viterbo University in La Crosse, Wisc., recently sent an email to its employees announcing "a few small but important changes” to its email signature guidelines "to improve consistency, professionalism, and alignment with our updated university brand.”
The guidelines include telling employees not to include image files in email signatures, noting they can not only cause many technical issues but also that "most image files are not correctly labeled to meet ADA compliance requirements.”
The email, which used the subject line "ACTION REQUESTED: Updating email signatures and profile photos,” also asked employees to upload a professional photo to their profile or use a Viterbo logo for hospitality and branding purposes.
The Sept. 2 memo, sent by Viterbo’s Vice President for Marketing, Communications, and Enrollment, Erin Edlund, also gave employees an email signature template to follow that asked them to use either the Helvetica or Georgia font and included a prompt for pronouns.
First Last Name (pronouns: list yours here)
Viterbo University
Title | Department
555-555-5555
Office Room Number
She included her own pronouns of "she/her/hers” at the conclusion of the same email.
So this female/woman/xchromosomer wants to just let people decide if they are men or women or furrries or whatnot. God isn't in control; we are! It is our right to decide if we are men or women, human or animal, etc. That is what she said here.
God made them male and female, according to Genesis; there was nothing about "gender fluidity" nor about our right to choose our own gender. it's patently clear.
The article continues:
Asked to weigh in on the controversy, Tom Nash, a staff apologist at Catholic Answers, a media ministry group about the Catholic Church, told The College Fix that Viterbo’s decision "is another bowing to the zeitgeist, i.e., the spirit of the age, which says we can determine who we are, not our Creator.”
"It seems like a misguided attempt at solidarity with students—and perhaps faculty and staff as well at Viterbo University—who are experiencing gender-identity disorder (GID),” Nash said.
But he added Catholic teaching is "clear that we are made in God’s image and likeness, and that ‘male and female he created them’ (Gen. 1:26-27).”
"There’s no reason why a male faculty member should add ‘he/him’ to his university email signature, or a woman faculty member ‘she/her,’ as those are self-evident realities—or should be,” he said via email.
"It seems like a misguided attempt at solidarity with students—and perhaps faculty and staff as well at Viterbo University—who are experiencing gender-identity disorder (GID),” Nash said.
But he added Catholic teaching is "clear that we are made in God’s image and likeness, and that ‘male and female he created them’ (Gen. 1:26-27).”
"There’s no reason why a male faculty member should add ‘he/him’ to his university email signature, or a woman faculty member ‘she/her,’ as those are self-evident realities—or should be,” he said via email.
If for some reason said faculty member needed to add a pronoun they are free to do so, but there is no reason to impose "chosen pronouncs" on people.
I would add this university also sponsors a "pride club" aka homosexual group. And has a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Center.
Not sure where Christ or the Holy Trinity or the Blessed Virgin Mary fit in with any of this.
But, but, but.... Isn't Christianity just about love and shouldn't Christians be trying to engage with people for their salvation?
Yes. And it is love that leads the Church to gently chastise the sinner, lest he orshe or xi wind up meeting the fate in the Corinthians quote. Love often requires us to do some hard things.
There is an old adage that says "the opposite of love isnot hate but indifference" and that is very true where sin is concerned. If you love a sinner you don't just let him skip merrily to Hell. You try to save that person. It is our duty to warn them thatwhat they are doing might seem right to them ("there is a way that seems right to a man but it leads to death") but in the end it will lead to ETERNAL suffering and despair.
But of course we've stopped believing in Hell because we don't accept that God is all just as well as all merciful. We like the mercy end of it but not the judge, so we simply dismiss the judge. God becomes a rather cartoonish character who we can kick around and He'll just come back with open arms. But that isn't the case at all and just a casual observation of reality tells us God will in fact punish sins. We see the results of sin all around us, the horrible suffering and misery caused by it.
So, will Charles Manson go to Heaven? It could be argued that he didn't make himself what he was and so should be let in. That's what happens when you have simple blind love without any sort of reason attached. EVERYONE, Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Jeffrey Dahmer, John Waybe Gayce, etc. must be let into Heaven by this standard. Heaven wouldn't be Heaven long if that were so. It would be at beast like Earth, and actually would be more like Hell.
And this is fair because these people all had choices and chose to do evil. It's who they want to be and they are where they want to go.
It is the job of the Christian to warn those headed down this path, not to judge them but to warn them and to work to get them to repent. Paul gave us the template; he said we are to quietly speak with an open sinner and if they still won't repent bring Church elders, and if they still won't to cut them off,lest their sin infect others. Sin is a contagion, a disease.
Christianity has forgotten that and now everyone thinks it's our duty to embrace people who obstinately persist in evil and sinful behavior. As a result we no longer believe in Sin at all; it's just an "alternate lifestyle" or a phase. "God loves the Sinner" they say. But like the father of the Prodigal Son He is willing to let them go if that's what they want. It IS our job to offer love and forgiveness, but they must ASK for forgiveness first.
Does a wife forgive her husband if he has an affair? She might if he is truly repntant and cuts off the relationship. She never will, indeed cannot, if he says he's sorry but he's going to keep doing it. If she tries to keep the relationship alive despite his affair it will never work and we all know that. As the Bible says, we cannot serve two masters, nor can we be in a marriage with someone with a divided loyalty. Some things require committment.
God is like that. He does love everyone and wishes everyone would repent, but He set up the rules long before the foundations of the world were laid and if people break the rules out of weakness, or even willfully but ask forgiveness He will grant it. But how do you forgive when someone isn't sorry and plans to keep doing bad things?
This isn't that hard to understand. A glutton who eats huge amounts of food will grow enormously fat, and when such a person dies we do not think God was somehow unfair in letting the person have a heart attack. We think rather thatit was a shame the man or woman didn't get their diet under control. But they knew the risks and did nothing about it. Yes, many suffer from weight problems, myself included. Many are forever trying to lose weight, and in many cases it's not their fault exactly. We try to help them with drugs, with exercise programs, with emotional support. But in the end they have to WANT to lose the weight or they will just keep growing. That is how people wind up weighing 600 lbs and have to be buried at age 28 in a piano case. In the end we have to accept their choice. I remember a television show about morbidly obese people and the mother of such a man said it "he's committing slow suicide". But how do you stop that?
How do you deal with any of the seven deadly sins? The wrathful and sullen don't want our love. Nether do the greedy. Ebeneazor Scrooge, in A Christmas Carole, had to be shown he was going to die and go to Hell before he repented of being such a jackass. Nobody ever drew him in with kind words and content-less forgiveness.
We have free will. God gave that to us lest he be a tyrant. But there are costs with free will.
Free will came as a gift, an act of love by God. If we choose to abuse it that is our right but we must bear the consequences. God would not be loving if that weren't so.
So this idea that we are somehow more loving by encouraging and nurturing sexual immorality and a willful rejection of reality is nonsense. It's the indifferent approach, not the loving.
BTW transgenderism is essentially the sin of witchcraft; an attempt to alter reality by an expression of will. Witches use potions - trans people use hormones. Witches chant, trans chant as well. Both believe you can appeal to some sort of outside force to alter the very bedrock of reality.
That's what this woman at this allegedly Catholic university has done here. she is essentially a witch with a PH.D.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:10 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1631 words, total size 10 kb.
Illegal Iowa Educator
Timothy Birdnow
The Iowa school superintendent who is being deported was ordered deported eariler on weapons charges as well as being an illegal alien - and he was appointed by a radical leftist who it turns out was Michelle Obama's chief of staff!
According to the Pajamas Media article:
Once again the Bush family shows it is allied more with the Ruling Class and the Left than with middle America.
The article continues:
This woman was in a postion to appoint an illegal alien to a position of authority and she did so. As she was knowingly complicit with a crime she should be prosecuted for it. There are laws againstharboring fugitives.
This is how it works with the Left; laws are just there to be weaponized against those nasty Conservatives. They are mere suggestions for the Left.
We had 12 years of the Bush family interspersed with Clinton, who was ideologically not much different. The Bush's almost destroyed America, allowing the country to move far to the Left. But then, we shouldn't have doubted that; Bush Sr. was a liberral Republican who mocked Ronald Reagan and called Supply Side Economics "voodoo economics". Reagan only accepted him as veep because the country club wing pitched a fit. We never should have trusted that man, or his ignorant pseudo-cowboy son.
And never, ever, should a leftie connected with the Marxist Obamas be in a posittion to influence young minds. Never.
The Superintendent is a man named Andre' Roberts and he came here illegally from Guyana.
The Iowa school superintendent who is being deported was ordered deported eariler on weapons charges as well as being an illegal alien - and he was appointed by a radical leftist who it turns out was Michelle Obama's chief of staff!
According to the Pajamas Media article:
Jackie Norris, who recently launched her campaign for United States Senate, is a former chief of staff for Michelle Obama. And she thought it would be a fabulous idea to have an illegal alien take a taxpayer-funded job and have the power to influence tens of thousands of children’s education.
Norris’s Senate campaign website brags about her position on the Des Moines School Board, and how she "came to Iowa in 1998 to help elect Tom Vilsack, the first Democratic governor to be elected in the state in 30 years.” Here’s the most interesting background section:
Jackie served as Chief of Staff to Michelle Obama in the White House championing efforts to make kids healthier and supporting military spouses. She later launched the Corporate Institute at President George H. W. Bush’s Points of Light organization, where she built out volunteerism at companies across the United States.
The Bush family has become much more left-leaning over the years, particularly in regards to illegal immigration, so it’s not such a stretch to imagine a Michelle Obama staffer moving on to a Bush organization.
Norris’s Senate campaign website brags about her position on the Des Moines School Board, and how she "came to Iowa in 1998 to help elect Tom Vilsack, the first Democratic governor to be elected in the state in 30 years.” Here’s the most interesting background section:
Jackie served as Chief of Staff to Michelle Obama in the White House championing efforts to make kids healthier and supporting military spouses. She later launched the Corporate Institute at President George H. W. Bush’s Points of Light organization, where she built out volunteerism at companies across the United States.
The Bush family has become much more left-leaning over the years, particularly in regards to illegal immigration, so it’s not such a stretch to imagine a Michelle Obama staffer moving on to a Bush organization.
Once again the Bush family shows it is allied more with the Ruling Class and the Left than with middle America.
The article continues:
The interesting part is, Norris isn’t just a leftist — that can mean everything from a socialist professor to an Antifa terrorist to a "moderate” liberal these days — she is quite explicitly a Democrat. She brags about her Obama ties and how she helped wokeify Iowa. In fact, as you can see above, she has also been promoting globalist climate propagandist and ex-Biden/Obama official John Kerry.
This woman was in a postion to appoint an illegal alien to a position of authority and she did so. As she was knowingly complicit with a crime she should be prosecuted for it. There are laws againstharboring fugitives.
This is how it works with the Left; laws are just there to be weaponized against those nasty Conservatives. They are mere suggestions for the Left.
We had 12 years of the Bush family interspersed with Clinton, who was ideologically not much different. The Bush's almost destroyed America, allowing the country to move far to the Left. But then, we shouldn't have doubted that; Bush Sr. was a liberral Republican who mocked Ronald Reagan and called Supply Side Economics "voodoo economics". Reagan only accepted him as veep because the country club wing pitched a fit. We never should have trusted that man, or his ignorant pseudo-cowboy son.
And never, ever, should a leftie connected with the Marxist Obamas be in a posittion to influence young minds. Never.
The Superintendent is a man named Andre' Roberts and he came here illegally from Guyana.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:05 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 505 words, total size 3 kb.
Comey's Double Standard
Timothy Birdnow
Funny how he doesn't like it when the shoe is on the other foot.
‘Rule Of Law Endures’: Watch Comey Celebrate Political Prosecutions Of Trump
Funny how he doesn't like it when the shoe is on the other foot.
‘Rule Of Law Endures’: Watch Comey Celebrate Political Prosecutions Of Trump
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:45 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
Israel was Giving Patriot Missiles to Ukraine
Timothy Birdnow
Interesting; the Israelis and Ukrainians have generally despised one another as the Ukrainians have a long and sordid history of anit-semitism.
In First, Zelensky Confirms Israel Sent Patriot Missile Battery To Ukraine, With More On Way
This shows the Ukrainians are desperate - desperate enough to ask for help from Israel.
It also shows a very poor lack of judgement on the part of Netanyahu and the Israelis as they can ill-afford to give up any weapons at this point; they are going toneed everything they have.
Trump will have to punish them for this, I fear (unless it was Trump himself who asked them to do it - not an impossibility.)
Israel has sought to stay out of the fray in Eastern Europe, sending humanitarian aid but little else. They do not want to provoke Rrussia, which can still drive events in the Middle East.
It is theorized Israel did this in response to deepening ties between Russia and Iran. But it couldlead to Moscow intervening in the war in Palestine in favor of Hamas.
This may be a far more serious escalation than anyone believes at present. Moscow is mad about losing Syria as it's warm-water Mediterranean port anyway. They may try to find a new port; an independent Palestine could well serve.
Imagine the Russian navy based in Jaffa, next door to Tel Aviv!
I doubt Israel would allow that, nor the U.S., and if there was a danger of such a thing happening it could lead to war.
Russia only has a few year round ice-free ports. St. Petersburgh on the Blatic (of which they own atin sliver), the ports on the Black Sea (all of which can be closed easily by blocking the Bosporus and Dardenelles), Vladivostok (at the end of everywhere), and that is pretty much it.
During WWII the Russians had to be supplied via deliveries to Archangel and other Arctic ports, which were closed much of the time.
So the Russians have always needed a Mediterranean port from which to operate and run their navy. It used to be Syria.
The Russians have long held a pro-Arab policy, too, in defiance of America's support for Israel. It was Russian meddling in the region that has led to the constant terrorist warfare against Israel. (The Russians figured there were a lot more Arabs than Jews.) The Palestinian cause is the cause for the Arab world, and largely because they believe that where Islam sets it's flag it must never be moved. They want to take back Spain and Bulgaria and Greece too, but it infuriates them the Jews took the Holy Land away from them. The call Israel a "Crusader state" and conflate that with colonialism. But it's not; the Jews were always there, before, during, and after. Just more Jews came in and made a new nation from the British territory, territory won in WWI from the Ottoman Turks. It was the Turks who were the colonialists, from the time the Seljuk Turks conquered the region.
At any rate Russia has always championed the Islamic cause and they support Iran now. If Israel meddles in the war with Ukraine they will take action of some sort. Depending on how the war is actually going (we get lies from our media about it) the Russia response will be either muted or not. But respond they will; they'll have to. Giving weapons to an enemy in time of war is an act of war.
The Russians can get the Arab world on their side by backing Palestine in the conflict.
So little by little we keep ratcheting this thing up. I know; Putin is as guilty of that as anybody. But SOMEBODY has to be the adult in this room. This is how nuclear wars start.
Interesting; the Israelis and Ukrainians have generally despised one another as the Ukrainians have a long and sordid history of anit-semitism.
In First, Zelensky Confirms Israel Sent Patriot Missile Battery To Ukraine, With More On Way
This shows the Ukrainians are desperate - desperate enough to ask for help from Israel.
It also shows a very poor lack of judgement on the part of Netanyahu and the Israelis as they can ill-afford to give up any weapons at this point; they are going toneed everything they have.
Trump will have to punish them for this, I fear (unless it was Trump himself who asked them to do it - not an impossibility.)
Israel has sought to stay out of the fray in Eastern Europe, sending humanitarian aid but little else. They do not want to provoke Rrussia, which can still drive events in the Middle East.
It is theorized Israel did this in response to deepening ties between Russia and Iran. But it couldlead to Moscow intervening in the war in Palestine in favor of Hamas.
This may be a far more serious escalation than anyone believes at present. Moscow is mad about losing Syria as it's warm-water Mediterranean port anyway. They may try to find a new port; an independent Palestine could well serve.
Imagine the Russian navy based in Jaffa, next door to Tel Aviv!
I doubt Israel would allow that, nor the U.S., and if there was a danger of such a thing happening it could lead to war.
Russia only has a few year round ice-free ports. St. Petersburgh on the Blatic (of which they own atin sliver), the ports on the Black Sea (all of which can be closed easily by blocking the Bosporus and Dardenelles), Vladivostok (at the end of everywhere), and that is pretty much it.
During WWII the Russians had to be supplied via deliveries to Archangel and other Arctic ports, which were closed much of the time.
So the Russians have always needed a Mediterranean port from which to operate and run their navy. It used to be Syria.
The Russians have long held a pro-Arab policy, too, in defiance of America's support for Israel. It was Russian meddling in the region that has led to the constant terrorist warfare against Israel. (The Russians figured there were a lot more Arabs than Jews.) The Palestinian cause is the cause for the Arab world, and largely because they believe that where Islam sets it's flag it must never be moved. They want to take back Spain and Bulgaria and Greece too, but it infuriates them the Jews took the Holy Land away from them. The call Israel a "Crusader state" and conflate that with colonialism. But it's not; the Jews were always there, before, during, and after. Just more Jews came in and made a new nation from the British territory, territory won in WWI from the Ottoman Turks. It was the Turks who were the colonialists, from the time the Seljuk Turks conquered the region.
At any rate Russia has always championed the Islamic cause and they support Iran now. If Israel meddles in the war with Ukraine they will take action of some sort. Depending on how the war is actually going (we get lies from our media about it) the Russia response will be either muted or not. But respond they will; they'll have to. Giving weapons to an enemy in time of war is an act of war.
The Russians can get the Arab world on their side by backing Palestine in the conflict.
So little by little we keep ratcheting this thing up. I know; Putin is as guilty of that as anybody. But SOMEBODY has to be the adult in this room. This is how nuclear wars start.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:41 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 641 words, total size 4 kb.
Hegseth to Send National Guard to Portland
Timothy Birdnow
Portland has been out of control for years now.
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth to Activate Oregon National Guard to Portland
Trump should have done this in his first term when Antifa rioters parts of the city.
Portland has been out of control for years now.
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth to Activate Oregon National Guard to Portland
Trump should have done this in his first term when Antifa rioters parts of the city.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:04 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
Swiss Take the Mark
Timothy Birdnow
The rise of the Beast and the mark of his name.
Swiss Voters Approve Digital I.D.in Dead Heat
If the Swiss will allow themselves to be tracked by computer then all of Europe is going to follow suit.
The rise of the Beast and the mark of his name.
Swiss Voters Approve Digital I.D.in Dead Heat
If the Swiss will allow themselves to be tracked by computer then all of Europe is going to follow suit.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:03 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
September 28, 2025
Blithering Blumenthal
Timothy Birdnow
Not sure if he's this self-unaware or if he's just this hypocritical.
Who crossed the line? It wasn't the Republicans, or Trump. It was the Democrats who started by spying on Trump and fostering a lie about how Trump was a traitor to America by working for the Russians in order to achieve power. It was the endless innvestigations into things they knew were not crimes. It was the twisting of Trump's words to gin up fury. It was the endless rage, the rage that led to two assassination attempts on trump and assassination attempts on Republicans across the country.
And who changed the norms? Trump merely fought back.
Now the cowards are trying to hide behind norms, and the presupposition of Blumenthal's argument is that Trump is coming for Comey personally in retribution. NOT that Comey committed a crrime, oh no! Comey was personally involved in the attempt to take Trump out yet Blumenthal says it's TRUMP who is the bad guy here. (BTW Trump did not indict Comey; he was indicted by ajury of his own peers in a Democratic area.)
Where was Blumenthal's concern for norms when the FBI planted spies in the Trump campaign? When they entrapped his people (like Popodopoulis, or Mike Flynn)? Where was he when Obama ordered the creation of a new threat assessment after one came out saying Russians hadn't interfered in the election? Where was he during the many hearings when Democrats wouldn't allow Trump's defense to call witnesses? Where was he when they lied about what Trump said to the Ukrainians (for which they impeached him) or for what he said about Charlottesville, or when he asked protesters on J6 to peacefully protest? Where was he they broke every rule by which politics operated to get Trump out of office?
So now the wheels of justice are starting to turn and he calls that a breech of norms, because he knows trials will bring out exactly what he and his cohorts have been doing.
For eight years now people like Blumenthal have argued nobody is above the law (after years of making the Clintons and Obamas and just about every other Democrat above the law). Now he doesn't like the law being applied to his side.
There will be a special place in Hell for guys like this.
Not sure if he's this self-unaware or if he's just this hypocritical.
"My colleagues have to draw a line. My Republican colleagues have to grow a spine here. For a decade, I have been waiting time after time, the Mueller Report, the impeachment trial, again and again, for Republicans to say it is a bridge too far,And, in effect, to say, we need to reserve basic norms, essential rules that protect all of us. And the old saying, what comes around, goes around. Today it’s a Republican president, but degrading the democracy and ruining, literally perverting the great ethos and tradition of the Department of Justice.”
Democrat Senator Richard Blumenthal.
Who crossed the line? It wasn't the Republicans, or Trump. It was the Democrats who started by spying on Trump and fostering a lie about how Trump was a traitor to America by working for the Russians in order to achieve power. It was the endless innvestigations into things they knew were not crimes. It was the twisting of Trump's words to gin up fury. It was the endless rage, the rage that led to two assassination attempts on trump and assassination attempts on Republicans across the country.
And who changed the norms? Trump merely fought back.
Now the cowards are trying to hide behind norms, and the presupposition of Blumenthal's argument is that Trump is coming for Comey personally in retribution. NOT that Comey committed a crrime, oh no! Comey was personally involved in the attempt to take Trump out yet Blumenthal says it's TRUMP who is the bad guy here. (BTW Trump did not indict Comey; he was indicted by ajury of his own peers in a Democratic area.)
Where was Blumenthal's concern for norms when the FBI planted spies in the Trump campaign? When they entrapped his people (like Popodopoulis, or Mike Flynn)? Where was he when Obama ordered the creation of a new threat assessment after one came out saying Russians hadn't interfered in the election? Where was he during the many hearings when Democrats wouldn't allow Trump's defense to call witnesses? Where was he when they lied about what Trump said to the Ukrainians (for which they impeached him) or for what he said about Charlottesville, or when he asked protesters on J6 to peacefully protest? Where was he they broke every rule by which politics operated to get Trump out of office?
So now the wheels of justice are starting to turn and he calls that a breech of norms, because he knows trials will bring out exactly what he and his cohorts have been doing.
For eight years now people like Blumenthal have argued nobody is above the law (after years of making the Clintons and Obamas and just about every other Democrat above the law). Now he doesn't like the law being applied to his side.
There will be a special place in Hell for guys like this.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:23 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 490 words, total size 3 kb.
The Horror Hour
Timothy Birdnow
Very interesting - an not just a little bit frightening!
U.S. Scientists Assembled Viruses That Were Designed by AI — They Were Shocked When They Started Hunting Down Bacteria and Reproducing
As the article observers, this sounds like the beginning of a doomsday movie.
How long beforeAI and automation make the human scientists unnecessary to the process? And what happens if the AI decides human beings ARE the virus and need tobe removed?
Apparently scientists at Stanford devised tthis program which led to AI generating a virus capable of hunting down and killing e-coli.
This has potential for great good; you could cure diseases with such a plague. In time this could lead to a sci-fi dream; the creation of nanobots to repair human bodies, giving us immortality, or nearly enough. Fix things as fast as they break down and you live forever! But there is a terrible price for immortality, and many S-F writers have testified to that; a slowing of progress, a society where the top people in a field remain on top forever, boredom,ennui, disappointment, despair. Norms will be tossed out just to liven things up. The old will perform anti-social acts just to keep some spice in their lives. I would add life probably would become very cheap as it's hard to take it away; people won't value it and murder would become common.
At any rate that's if this would turn into nano-tech.
There is another thing to ponder; directed panspermia. DP is the theoryclung to by people who understand Darwinian evolution couldn't happen as quickly as it did on Earth and so look for an answer. Their answer is that aliens seeded the Earth. As I've pointed out to many in the Darrwin crowd (who dispute DP for reasons very similar to my own) aliens would likely be seeding Earth for colonization and would have a pre-planned course of evolution. This tech could actually do that in time; stop unwanted mutations and keep the genome on the pre-planned course. We may want to use it in the distant future ourselves if we plan to terraform,say, Mars.
But I think the danger isn't worth the risk, most espeically if we surrender control to a computer intelligence.
Increasingly it's obvious we need the Three Laws of Asimov. They are 1.A robot (or AI) cannot harm a human being, or through inaction allow one to come to harm 2.A robot must obey the orders given it by a human being except where those orders conflict with the first law and 3.a robot must protect it's own existence except when that conflicts with the other two laws. Asimov's rules were not just written; they were built into the robot brains and these algorithms could not be overwritten without destroying the machine. A robot that even accidentally hurt a human being would have it's brain short circuit and it would die.
Until we figure out how to do such a thing AI is too dangerous a tool to play with. We've even understood that for centuries, with stories first of gollum, then Frankenstein, and then robots and crazy computers like HAL 9000 from 2001: A Space Odyssey.
In fact what we are trying to do is create our own god, a god who represents the best and worst of our own hearts. The one true God will not tolerate this, I assxure you. I believe this is the sin that will ultimately lead to the near total destruction of humanity and the Earth. The First Commandment makes it clear we are not to do this. God punished the Israelites severely for worshipping false gods. How much more will He punish us?
As long as we keep them as machines, blind and mindless servants, it won't be a problem. But AI is a whole different thing. We seek to replace God with AI. it won't end well.
Very interesting - an not just a little bit frightening!
U.S. Scientists Assembled Viruses That Were Designed by AI — They Were Shocked When They Started Hunting Down Bacteria and Reproducing
As the article observers, this sounds like the beginning of a doomsday movie.
How long beforeAI and automation make the human scientists unnecessary to the process? And what happens if the AI decides human beings ARE the virus and need tobe removed?
Apparently scientists at Stanford devised tthis program which led to AI generating a virus capable of hunting down and killing e-coli.
This has potential for great good; you could cure diseases with such a plague. In time this could lead to a sci-fi dream; the creation of nanobots to repair human bodies, giving us immortality, or nearly enough. Fix things as fast as they break down and you live forever! But there is a terrible price for immortality, and many S-F writers have testified to that; a slowing of progress, a society where the top people in a field remain on top forever, boredom,ennui, disappointment, despair. Norms will be tossed out just to liven things up. The old will perform anti-social acts just to keep some spice in their lives. I would add life probably would become very cheap as it's hard to take it away; people won't value it and murder would become common.
At any rate that's if this would turn into nano-tech.
There is another thing to ponder; directed panspermia. DP is the theoryclung to by people who understand Darwinian evolution couldn't happen as quickly as it did on Earth and so look for an answer. Their answer is that aliens seeded the Earth. As I've pointed out to many in the Darrwin crowd (who dispute DP for reasons very similar to my own) aliens would likely be seeding Earth for colonization and would have a pre-planned course of evolution. This tech could actually do that in time; stop unwanted mutations and keep the genome on the pre-planned course. We may want to use it in the distant future ourselves if we plan to terraform,say, Mars.
But I think the danger isn't worth the risk, most espeically if we surrender control to a computer intelligence.
Increasingly it's obvious we need the Three Laws of Asimov. They are 1.A robot (or AI) cannot harm a human being, or through inaction allow one to come to harm 2.A robot must obey the orders given it by a human being except where those orders conflict with the first law and 3.a robot must protect it's own existence except when that conflicts with the other two laws. Asimov's rules were not just written; they were built into the robot brains and these algorithms could not be overwritten without destroying the machine. A robot that even accidentally hurt a human being would have it's brain short circuit and it would die.
Until we figure out how to do such a thing AI is too dangerous a tool to play with. We've even understood that for centuries, with stories first of gollum, then Frankenstein, and then robots and crazy computers like HAL 9000 from 2001: A Space Odyssey.
In fact what we are trying to do is create our own god, a god who represents the best and worst of our own hearts. The one true God will not tolerate this, I assxure you. I believe this is the sin that will ultimately lead to the near total destruction of humanity and the Earth. The First Commandment makes it clear we are not to do this. God punished the Israelites severely for worshipping false gods. How much more will He punish us?
As long as we keep them as machines, blind and mindless servants, it won't be a problem. But AI is a whole different thing. We seek to replace God with AI. it won't end well.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:52 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 652 words, total size 4 kb.
<< Page 1 of 12 >>
108kb generated in CPU 0.1198, elapsed 0.4778 seconds.
45 queries taking 0.4607 seconds, 254 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
45 queries taking 0.4607 seconds, 254 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
