February 03, 2026
Judges Gone Wild
Timothy Birdnow
Another day, another judicial abomination.
This Uruguayan born judge blocked Trump;s ending of TPP
The text of the TPP law is quite explicit - there can be no judicial review of decisions made by the President. Since it is exercising his power over immigration the courts have no say in the matter.
But this Puta - judge Ana Reyes - is simply ignoring this provision. She argues it doesn't apply because, well, basically, she doesn't want it to apply:
the word "any determination” captures all determinations the Secretary may make—whether to expand, designate, or terminate—but it does not capture the process by which she reaches that determination.
So it depends on the meaning of the word is.
And since the Haitians who are here don't want to go back to a poorly run impoverished hellhole and poop into a hole in the ground Trump and his friends can't make them, so there!
This judge's primary argument is that Haitians benefit the economy. So she can rewrite laws passed by Congress because SHE believes it will be good for the economy. That isn't at all her field. Economic policy is political by design and the Judiciary is supposed to be the one branch of government that is a-political. She's sticking her nose where it doesn't belong.
In another episode of Judges Gone Wild an appellate court has
dismissed ethics complaints against James Boasberg the judge who has vowed to get President Trump and who has hounded and harassed him since before he was elected.
Boasberg repeatedly approved "Arctic Frost" warrants to spy on Trump and on others in the GOP. He has twice faced articles of impeachment in Congress, articles which died because of Democratic opposition.
We have to rein in the Judiciary; it was never supposed to dow what it has been doing. The weaponization of the Law is one of the great tragedies of the 21st century.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:11 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 333 words, total size 3 kb.
1
In the case of Judge Reyes, it would certainly seem to me that the wording of the law should be enough to slap her down. Perhaps since she's foreign-born, she's not well-enough versed in the language to understand the ins and outs of the law, but someone in the Executive Branch ought to be able to fix things properly.
In the case of Bozoberg, it's really past time he was sent to pasture with the help of some heavyweights. Guido, are you listening?
In the case of Bozoberg, it's really past time he was sent to pasture with the help of some heavyweights. Guido, are you listening?
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at February 03, 2026 11:47 PM (/xiww)
2
Reyes shouldn't have a law license if she can't understand the text of the law, much less be on the bench.
As for Boasberg he's not even trying to follow the law. He should be assigned no cases and moved into a broom closet until we can turn Congress enough to successfully remove him from office.
As for Boasberg he's not even trying to follow the law. He should be assigned no cases and moved into a broom closet until we can turn Congress enough to successfully remove him from office.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at February 04, 2026 09:26 AM (umJ+Y)
24kb generated in CPU 0.1308, elapsed 0.2226 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2115 seconds, 185 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.2115 seconds, 185 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
