April 18, 2025
The Passion
The Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ
According to John:
After Jesus had spoken these words, he went out with his disciples across the Kidron valley to a place where there was a garden, which he and his disciples entered. 2Now Judas, who betrayed him, also knew the place, because Jesus often met there with his disciples. 3So Judas brought a detachment of soldiers together with police from the chief priests and the Pharisees, and they came there with lanterns and torches and weapons. 4Then Jesus, knowing all that was to happen to him, came forward and asked them, ‘For whom are you looking?’ 5They answered, ‘Jesus of Nazareth.’* Jesus replied, ‘I am he.’* Judas, who betrayed him, was standing with them. 6When Jesus* said to them, ‘I am he’,* they stepped back and fell to the ground. 7Again he asked them, ‘For whom are you looking?’ And they said, ‘Jesus of Nazareth.’* 8Jesus answered, ‘I told you that I am he.* So if you are looking for me, let these men go.’ 9This was to fulfil the word that he had spoken, ‘I did not lose a single one of those whom you gave me.’ 10Then Simon Peter, who had a sword, drew it, struck the high priest’s slave, and cut off his right ear. The slave’s name was Malchus. 11Jesus said to Peter, ‘Put your sword back into its sheath. Am I not to drink the cup that the Father has given me?’
Jesus before the High Priest more...
According to John:
After Jesus had spoken these words, he went out with his disciples across the Kidron valley to a place where there was a garden, which he and his disciples entered. 2Now Judas, who betrayed him, also knew the place, because Jesus often met there with his disciples. 3So Judas brought a detachment of soldiers together with police from the chief priests and the Pharisees, and they came there with lanterns and torches and weapons. 4Then Jesus, knowing all that was to happen to him, came forward and asked them, ‘For whom are you looking?’ 5They answered, ‘Jesus of Nazareth.’* Jesus replied, ‘I am he.’* Judas, who betrayed him, was standing with them. 6When Jesus* said to them, ‘I am he’,* they stepped back and fell to the ground. 7Again he asked them, ‘For whom are you looking?’ And they said, ‘Jesus of Nazareth.’* 8Jesus answered, ‘I told you that I am he.* So if you are looking for me, let these men go.’ 9This was to fulfil the word that he had spoken, ‘I did not lose a single one of those whom you gave me.’ 10Then Simon Peter, who had a sword, drew it, struck the high priest’s slave, and cut off his right ear. The slave’s name was Malchus. 11Jesus said to Peter, ‘Put your sword back into its sheath. Am I not to drink the cup that the Father has given me?’
Jesus before the High Priest more...
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:59 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 2014 words, total size 12 kb.
Boasberg and Crossfire Hurricane
Timothy Birdnow
Judge Boasberg had a hand in protecting the people who plotted the framing of Donald Trump via the Russian collusion hoax.
Convicted FBI lawyer spared from prison by Boasberg far more involved in Russia probe than known
Boasberg the clown had let Kevin Clinesmith off with a slap on the wrist. Turns out Clinesmith was intimately involved in the Russiagate hoax.
FTA:
So it appears the good judge has a soft spot for the Deep State and a bone to pick with Mr. Trump. He thinks it's a shame Clinesmith didn't get away with it, apparently.
The law doesn't matter to clowns like this.
Judge Boasberg had a hand in protecting the people who plotted the framing of Donald Trump via the Russian collusion hoax.
Convicted FBI lawyer spared from prison by Boasberg far more involved in Russia probe than known
Boasberg the clown had let Kevin Clinesmith off with a slap on the wrist. Turns out Clinesmith was intimately involved in the Russiagate hoax.
FTA:
"Clinesmith, who worked on both the FBI’s Hillary Clinton email investigation and on the Trump-Russia collusion inquiry, pleaded guilty to falsifying a document during the bureau’s efforts to renew FISA authority to wiretap Carter Page, who was an adviser to Trump's 2016 campaign.
Newly-declassified details about Clinesmith’s involvement include a wide swath of information about his role in the case. He was a key go-to for former FBI lawyer Lisa Page and fired FBI special agent Peter Strzok throughout the debunked collusion saga and a main driver in obtaining a FISA warrant against Page based on the infamous Steele dossier.
Clinesmith also granted his seal of approval on a document describing the FBI’s pretextual briefing of then-candidate Trump, was deeply involved in the investigation into retired Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn, played a role in going after former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos, and more. He also helped the FBI push its "Cross Wind” investigation, which Just the News can confirm related to the targeting of security expert Walid Phares, which resulted in no accusations of wrongdoing and no charges.
Knee-deep in the mud
Clinesmith confessed in August 2020 that he had manipulated a CIA email in 2017 to state that Carter Page was "not a source” for the CIA when that agency had actually told the bureau on multiple occasions that Page was in fact an "operational contact” for the CIA.
Boasberg, the federal judge who is blocking Trump’s efforts to deport Venezuelan gang members, also played a key and controversial role in the aftermath of the Trump-Russia collusion saga as the leader of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The judge, nominated to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by then-President Barack Obama in 2011, is currently engaged in an all-out legal battle with the Trump Justice Department.
But in his role as the head of the FISA Court he made a number of divisive decisions, including a slap on the wrist for a member of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane team, the appointment of officials who had defended the FBI’s actions during the Russiagate saga, the renewal of the FBI’s FISA powers, and more.
Boasberg defends Clinesmith
Boasberg ruled this week that "probable cause exists” to hold Trump administration officials in criminal contempt after they violated his orders by continuing deportation flights. But his ruling follows the Supreme Court holding that Boasberg's court was in an improper venuefor the case altogether.
Boasberg, in his role as a federal judge, denied the Justice Department’s efforts to seek up to six months behind bars for Clinesmith, who pleaded guilty in Special Counsel John Durham’s Trump-Russia investigation — instead giving Clinesmith a year of probation, 400 hours of community service, and no fine.
Durham argued that Clinesmith’s "deceptive conduct” related to the FISA application fabrication "was antithetical to the duty of candor and eroded the FISA’s confidence in the accuracy of all previous FISA applications worked on by the defendant,” and said his deception "fueled public distrust of the FBI and of the entire FISA program itself.”
But Boasberg seemed to defend Clinesmith’s deceptive FISA-related actions during his January 2021 sentencing.
"Mr. Clinesmith likely believed that what he said was true," Boasberg wrote, adding, "I do not believe he was attempting to achieve an end he knew was wrong." The judge claimed that "it is not clear to me that the fourth FISA warrant would not have been signed but for this error. … Even if Mr. Clinesmith had been accurate about Mr. Page’s relationship with the other government agency, the warrant may well have been signed and the surveillance authorized."
Durham had argued that Clinesmith's deception "fueled public distrust of the FBI and of the entire FISA program itself.” Anthony Scarpelli, then a top prosecutor on Durham’s team, also argued that "the defendant’s criminal conduct tarnished the integrity of the FISA program” and that "the resulting harm is immeasurable.”
Clinesmith told the court that "I am deeply remorseful for any effect my actions may have had” on the FISA process even as he claimed that "I never intended to mislead my colleagues about the status of Dr. Page.”
But Boasberg lamented that Clinesmith had been "abused” and "vilified” on a "national scale” when the judge handed down his sentence, though he did acknowledge that the FISA court’s reputation "has suffered” from the ex-FBI attorney’s actions.
Newly-declassified details about Clinesmith’s involvement include a wide swath of information about his role in the case. He was a key go-to for former FBI lawyer Lisa Page and fired FBI special agent Peter Strzok throughout the debunked collusion saga and a main driver in obtaining a FISA warrant against Page based on the infamous Steele dossier.
Clinesmith also granted his seal of approval on a document describing the FBI’s pretextual briefing of then-candidate Trump, was deeply involved in the investigation into retired Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn, played a role in going after former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos, and more. He also helped the FBI push its "Cross Wind” investigation, which Just the News can confirm related to the targeting of security expert Walid Phares, which resulted in no accusations of wrongdoing and no charges.
Knee-deep in the mud
Clinesmith confessed in August 2020 that he had manipulated a CIA email in 2017 to state that Carter Page was "not a source” for the CIA when that agency had actually told the bureau on multiple occasions that Page was in fact an "operational contact” for the CIA.
Boasberg, the federal judge who is blocking Trump’s efforts to deport Venezuelan gang members, also played a key and controversial role in the aftermath of the Trump-Russia collusion saga as the leader of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The judge, nominated to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by then-President Barack Obama in 2011, is currently engaged in an all-out legal battle with the Trump Justice Department.
But in his role as the head of the FISA Court he made a number of divisive decisions, including a slap on the wrist for a member of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane team, the appointment of officials who had defended the FBI’s actions during the Russiagate saga, the renewal of the FBI’s FISA powers, and more.
Boasberg defends Clinesmith
Boasberg ruled this week that "probable cause exists” to hold Trump administration officials in criminal contempt after they violated his orders by continuing deportation flights. But his ruling follows the Supreme Court holding that Boasberg's court was in an improper venuefor the case altogether.
Boasberg, in his role as a federal judge, denied the Justice Department’s efforts to seek up to six months behind bars for Clinesmith, who pleaded guilty in Special Counsel John Durham’s Trump-Russia investigation — instead giving Clinesmith a year of probation, 400 hours of community service, and no fine.
Durham argued that Clinesmith’s "deceptive conduct” related to the FISA application fabrication "was antithetical to the duty of candor and eroded the FISA’s confidence in the accuracy of all previous FISA applications worked on by the defendant,” and said his deception "fueled public distrust of the FBI and of the entire FISA program itself.”
But Boasberg seemed to defend Clinesmith’s deceptive FISA-related actions during his January 2021 sentencing.
"Mr. Clinesmith likely believed that what he said was true," Boasberg wrote, adding, "I do not believe he was attempting to achieve an end he knew was wrong." The judge claimed that "it is not clear to me that the fourth FISA warrant would not have been signed but for this error. … Even if Mr. Clinesmith had been accurate about Mr. Page’s relationship with the other government agency, the warrant may well have been signed and the surveillance authorized."
Durham had argued that Clinesmith's deception "fueled public distrust of the FBI and of the entire FISA program itself.” Anthony Scarpelli, then a top prosecutor on Durham’s team, also argued that "the defendant’s criminal conduct tarnished the integrity of the FISA program” and that "the resulting harm is immeasurable.”
Clinesmith told the court that "I am deeply remorseful for any effect my actions may have had” on the FISA process even as he claimed that "I never intended to mislead my colleagues about the status of Dr. Page.”
But Boasberg lamented that Clinesmith had been "abused” and "vilified” on a "national scale” when the judge handed down his sentence, though he did acknowledge that the FISA court’s reputation "has suffered” from the ex-FBI attorney’s actions.
So it appears the good judge has a soft spot for the Deep State and a bone to pick with Mr. Trump. He thinks it's a shame Clinesmith didn't get away with it, apparently.
The law doesn't matter to clowns like this.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:42 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 836 words, total size 6 kb.
WHO Power Grab
Timothy Birdnow
The World Health Organization's attempted breathtaking power grab.
Thank God Trump is in power and will drown this abomination in the river.
FTA:
So either nobody will follow the treaty but will sign it anyway or this will empower the U.N. to compel obedience aka world government. And this "10% donations" business is what we call a tax, a world tax. And of course a "comprehensive view of supply chains" means they will control who eats and who has power and whatnot.
The cajones on this organization is astonishing. But of course China owns the WHO and this is THEIR scheme to hamstring the rest of the world and make the Middle Kingdom the rulers of us all.
The World Health Organization's attempted breathtaking power grab.
Thank God Trump is in power and will drown this abomination in the river.
FTA:
"The World Health Organization (WHO) has reportedly settled on the text for a legally binding treaty to enhance global preparedness for future pandemics.
The decision aims to prevent chaos and competition over resources, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The pact also emphasizes rapid data sharing on emerging diseases, enabling pharmaceutical firms to accelerate the development of vaccines.
The WHO will now have a comprehensive view of global supply chains under the new pact.
WHO’s Director-General, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, described the agreement as "a significant milestone in our shared journey towards a safer world.”
Tedros also noted that the pact demonstrates nations’ ability to collaborate on common challenges.
The treaty is only the second in the WHO’s history, the first being the 2003 tobacco control agreement.
Approval is now being sought at the upcoming World Health Assembly.
Under the treaty, countries must ensure the global availability of pandemic-related medications. At the same time, manufacturers are required to allocate 20 percent of vaccine, therapeutic, and diagnostic production to the WHO — distribute 10 percent as donations, and offer the remainder at accessible prices.
The decision aims to prevent chaos and competition over resources, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The pact also emphasizes rapid data sharing on emerging diseases, enabling pharmaceutical firms to accelerate the development of vaccines.
The WHO will now have a comprehensive view of global supply chains under the new pact.
WHO’s Director-General, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, described the agreement as "a significant milestone in our shared journey towards a safer world.”
Tedros also noted that the pact demonstrates nations’ ability to collaborate on common challenges.
The treaty is only the second in the WHO’s history, the first being the 2003 tobacco control agreement.
Approval is now being sought at the upcoming World Health Assembly.
Under the treaty, countries must ensure the global availability of pandemic-related medications. At the same time, manufacturers are required to allocate 20 percent of vaccine, therapeutic, and diagnostic production to the WHO — distribute 10 percent as donations, and offer the remainder at accessible prices.
So either nobody will follow the treaty but will sign it anyway or this will empower the U.N. to compel obedience aka world government. And this "10% donations" business is what we call a tax, a world tax. And of course a "comprehensive view of supply chains" means they will control who eats and who has power and whatnot.
The cajones on this organization is astonishing. But of course China owns the WHO and this is THEIR scheme to hamstring the rest of the world and make the Middle Kingdom the rulers of us all.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:26 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 305 words, total size 2 kb.
Defanging the Dragon
Timothy Birdnow
I never doubted for a minute that much of Trump's tariff-happy policies were aimed at crushing China and perhaps driving regime change there.
Trump Admin Preparing to Unleash a New Economic Weapon That Could Devastate China: Report
china has been and remains in a precarious economic position because they have to create so many new jobs to feed their younger generation and without strong economic growth the regime there is in peril. They have had strong economic growth but at the expense of the U.S. and European trading partners over the years. It was a conscious American policy championed by both sides of the aisle and not just so Congressmen could make money; people like Newt Gingrich advocated a strong and prosperous china. Their reasoning? They believed that, unlike the Soviet Union, China was more imperial than communist and that with an influx of money and goods China would morph into Germany (which had been more imperial than capitalist too). Gingrich has since done a mea culpa, admitting he was profoundly wrong.
I knew it was a serious mistake when we were doing it but everyone lusted after the billion+ Chinese market and believed a comforting lie.
So we created this leviathan and let it suck our own economy dry and now Trump has to do something about it before we are all speaking Mandarin and smoking opium in our silk pajamas.
I have always argued China is a paper tiger, only wildly successful because we have wildly failed our own citizenry. While China does make things and produce stuff, it is still basically parasitic; it doesn't really create anything new, just steals our science and technology and undercuts us. It's prosperity stems from our unwillingness to compete.
Did you know that before Trump came back into office China was receiving foreign aid from the United States? This while being our country's biggest competitor and having the second highest GDP in the world, just barely behind us. And we also give them Most Favored Nation status, even while they impose draconian tariffs on our goods. China also uses currency manipulation to squeeze us.
And China was buying up most of our debt so we wouldn't dare impoverish them and force their hand. Of course the Democrats and the RINO Republicans were happy owing China the whole country provided it kept them in office and allowed them to keep spending (which it did).
At any rate China's economy was never market driven, and her companies are merely extensions of the government (that is the definition of economic fascism). It may look like a capitalist country but it ishn't.
The Soviets were similar, although they didn't even pay lip service to free markets and so were much poorer than the Chicoms. But it went down the same; the Soviets seemed to do well enough, especially where atomic weapons and military hardware were concerned, but in the end their economy was a Potemkin Village, all facade and nothing for the people who actually had to live with it. I think China is much the same and they have been in the doldrums for a while now as their way of doing things has slowly hollowed out their economy.
And so what is Trump doing? What Ronald Reagan did. Reagan did it with a military buildup while Trump is doing it with tariffs and with strengthening the U.S. economy itself by chucking the ridiculous internationalist policies of his predecessers. China knows they can't compete, which is why they are turning so belligerant now. They realize that Trump isn't just trying to get a better trade deal - he's trying to destroy them.
At least that's what I think he's doing.
And, if he can stay the course long enough and Congress doesn't turn over he'll win. This has the Communists terrified, both in China and here. They need a successful communist country to act as a kernal for the growth of the movement worldwide. It was always their plan to "counterbalance" America with a communist country. Heck; Madeleine Albright admitted this in a speech once. She said it is not good that the U.S. was the world's lone superpower. She pined for the "bipolar world" of the Cold War. Her thinkiing was hardly unique among the intelligentsia either. Social evolution towards world government and socialism had to have a foe resisting the free markets system and the liberal societies of the West. It used to be the U.S.S.R. Now it's China.
If China goes BRICKS falls apart. Russia becomes isolated and will dissolve back into a large but poor despotate at best. If that happens the flow of money to the Islamic revolutionaries and terrorists dries up and the Middle Eastern conflict becomes a police matter. India and South Korea and other emerging nations become much stronger and we have more choices economically. We will see a worldwide realignment and probably a restoration of many of the things that made our country great, but we first must fix ourselves and to do that we have to defang the chinese dragon.
I think Trump is trying to do that, and I think he may well succeed.
I never doubted for a minute that much of Trump's tariff-happy policies were aimed at crushing China and perhaps driving regime change there.
Trump Admin Preparing to Unleash a New Economic Weapon That Could Devastate China: Report
china has been and remains in a precarious economic position because they have to create so many new jobs to feed their younger generation and without strong economic growth the regime there is in peril. They have had strong economic growth but at the expense of the U.S. and European trading partners over the years. It was a conscious American policy championed by both sides of the aisle and not just so Congressmen could make money; people like Newt Gingrich advocated a strong and prosperous china. Their reasoning? They believed that, unlike the Soviet Union, China was more imperial than communist and that with an influx of money and goods China would morph into Germany (which had been more imperial than capitalist too). Gingrich has since done a mea culpa, admitting he was profoundly wrong.
I knew it was a serious mistake when we were doing it but everyone lusted after the billion+ Chinese market and believed a comforting lie.
So we created this leviathan and let it suck our own economy dry and now Trump has to do something about it before we are all speaking Mandarin and smoking opium in our silk pajamas.
I have always argued China is a paper tiger, only wildly successful because we have wildly failed our own citizenry. While China does make things and produce stuff, it is still basically parasitic; it doesn't really create anything new, just steals our science and technology and undercuts us. It's prosperity stems from our unwillingness to compete.
Did you know that before Trump came back into office China was receiving foreign aid from the United States? This while being our country's biggest competitor and having the second highest GDP in the world, just barely behind us. And we also give them Most Favored Nation status, even while they impose draconian tariffs on our goods. China also uses currency manipulation to squeeze us.
And China was buying up most of our debt so we wouldn't dare impoverish them and force their hand. Of course the Democrats and the RINO Republicans were happy owing China the whole country provided it kept them in office and allowed them to keep spending (which it did).
At any rate China's economy was never market driven, and her companies are merely extensions of the government (that is the definition of economic fascism). It may look like a capitalist country but it ishn't.
The Soviets were similar, although they didn't even pay lip service to free markets and so were much poorer than the Chicoms. But it went down the same; the Soviets seemed to do well enough, especially where atomic weapons and military hardware were concerned, but in the end their economy was a Potemkin Village, all facade and nothing for the people who actually had to live with it. I think China is much the same and they have been in the doldrums for a while now as their way of doing things has slowly hollowed out their economy.
And so what is Trump doing? What Ronald Reagan did. Reagan did it with a military buildup while Trump is doing it with tariffs and with strengthening the U.S. economy itself by chucking the ridiculous internationalist policies of his predecessers. China knows they can't compete, which is why they are turning so belligerant now. They realize that Trump isn't just trying to get a better trade deal - he's trying to destroy them.
At least that's what I think he's doing.
And, if he can stay the course long enough and Congress doesn't turn over he'll win. This has the Communists terrified, both in China and here. They need a successful communist country to act as a kernal for the growth of the movement worldwide. It was always their plan to "counterbalance" America with a communist country. Heck; Madeleine Albright admitted this in a speech once. She said it is not good that the U.S. was the world's lone superpower. She pined for the "bipolar world" of the Cold War. Her thinkiing was hardly unique among the intelligentsia either. Social evolution towards world government and socialism had to have a foe resisting the free markets system and the liberal societies of the West. It used to be the U.S.S.R. Now it's China.
If China goes BRICKS falls apart. Russia becomes isolated and will dissolve back into a large but poor despotate at best. If that happens the flow of money to the Islamic revolutionaries and terrorists dries up and the Middle Eastern conflict becomes a police matter. India and South Korea and other emerging nations become much stronger and we have more choices economically. We will see a worldwide realignment and probably a restoration of many of the things that made our country great, but we first must fix ourselves and to do that we have to defang the chinese dragon.
I think Trump is trying to do that, and I think he may well succeed.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:19 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 866 words, total size 5 kb.
Tariffs Working
Timothy Birdnow
Does anyone REALLY believe this would have happened without the Trump Tariffs?
Honda Shifting Production of Civic Hybrid to U.S. From Japan
Does anyone REALLY believe this would have happened without the Trump Tariffs?
Honda Shifting Production of Civic Hybrid to U.S. From Japan
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:45 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
Garseeyalater Alligator
Timothy Birdnow
Thar she blows!
AG Bondi Releases Police Records Detailing Abrego Garcia’s Criminal History
I can't wait to see the media try to defend against this!
Thar she blows!
AG Bondi Releases Police Records Detailing Abrego Garcia’s Criminal History
I can't wait to see the media try to defend against this!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:44 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
Letitia James Mortgage Fraud
Timothy Birdnow
Letitia James is listed as her father's wife on mortgage documents.
This was the woman who sued Trump for half a billion dollars for alleged mortgage fraud.
The thing about rabid dogs like James is they usually think they are so smart and slick nobody will look into their own dealings, and if anyone does they always think they can talk their way out of it.
I'm going to enjoy watching her fall.
Letitia James is listed as her father's wife on mortgage documents.
This was the woman who sued Trump for half a billion dollars for alleged mortgage fraud.
The thing about rabid dogs like James is they usually think they are so smart and slick nobody will look into their own dealings, and if anyone does they always think they can talk their way out of it.
I'm going to enjoy watching her fall.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:27 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 79 words, total size 1 kb.
Catholics Can't Be Compelled to FundAbortion
Timothy Birdnow
We win one!
Judge Rules Catholic Employers Are Not Required to Cover Abortions
We win one!
Judge Rules Catholic Employers Are Not Required to Cover Abortions
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:21 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
The Empire Strokes Back
Timothy Birdnow
An appeals court judge has ruled against the Trump Administration fornot being zealous enough in bringing an MS-13 gangster and human trafficker back from El Salvador.
The court said it won't "micromanage" a lower court even while admitting the President has the authority to take this action:
If the President has "robust Article II powers" then it's a lower court that is usurping power and it was the duty of this court to overturn the idjit.
This is proof that we do NOT have a remedy for out orf control courts. The judiciary will protect it's own power first. That was the problem we had when we allowed the courts to usurp the authority of judicial review in the first place (and they usurped it in Marbury v. Madison; it is NOT found in the Constitution.)
Congress can deal with this easily enough; they can simply "uncreate" these activist courts. Yes, they can impeach, but the likelihood of getting sixty votes in the Senate is slim. But these courts were created by an act of Congress and they simply be uncreated. But of course the GOP is too chicken to do that.
So that forces Trump into the Andrew Jackson defeanse.
This whole thing was pre-planned, a careffully-orchestrated plot to trap Trump. Much like J6 is appearing to have been a devil's scheme, so too is this; the Democrats were looking for a person that they could rally behind as "illegally deported" so as to frame Trump as a monster who will deport Americans when it suits his needs. They were looking for just such an opportunity. I know this because of the way the media has portrayed this guy; a good family Maryland man. The reality is two different judges declared he was MS-13, and he had been under a deportation order that was suspended because he said he "feared for his life" in El Salvador. He was also a wife-beater and his wife filed an order of protection against him. He has been accused of human trafficking - the worst sort of crime. The media started that imeediately, telling me he was the guy they had been hoping to find.
IF Trump obeys the courts here he will then have a blizzard of such orders coming from all directions and he knows it. Also, the Democrats will then say Trump is importing domestic terrorists and human traffickers, much as they accused George H. W. Bush of being a tax and spend guy after they begged him to raise taxes and break his "read my lips" pledge. If Trump brings this guy back he'll be the poster child of every Democratic ad in the next election. And of course it will be the big win his base needs to reivigorate itself.
Trump understand all this, I suspect, which is why he's going to the mat on this now.
Meanwhile, Judge Bozoberg, er, Boasberg is still trying subvert the law and force Trump to suspend all deportation flights out of the country.
To quoute Andrew Jackson "it's his ruling, let him enforce it" when threatening to disregard John Marshall and the Supreme Court in Worcester v. Georgia.
Boasberg would need to send a referral for prosecution to the Trump Justice Department.
In Federalist 78 Alexander Hamilton argued for the Court and lifetime apppointments by pointing out it is the weakest of the three branches and has neither it's own money nor it's own enforcement power so was not to be feared. By extension that means an out-of-control judiciary could be ignored or defunded.
But we have turned it into a godlike apparatus and everyone is terrified of telling the courts to bugger off. But there comes a time when it must be done.
And actually it has repeatedly. Joe Biden simply disregarded the Supreme Court when he pushed ahead with his scheme to forgive student loans. Barack Hussein Obama (peace be upon him) ignored the courts many times, including his scheme to let the DREAMERS stay in the country when there was no law on the books permitting that. When Obama lost in court over surveillance of citizens he went to a secret FISA court and simply ignored the actual judiciary. When a Federal judge said he could not issue amnesties he simply ignored the ruling and did it anyway.
I could go on and on but the point is made; the Democrats have no problem with ignoring courts when it suits them. It's only when a Republican does it that they suddenly discover the Rule of Law.
At any rate, to return to Garcia, he needs to be indicted and face arrest and imprisonment as soon as he gets off the plane so that he is not mingling with the general public. It certainly can't be that hard to build a case against this scumbag. He should be given housing next door to the judge too.
The Democrats are going to try to impeach Trump over this if they win Congress in the next election (something they may well do). That was the whole point. That and terrifying the foolish and ginning up their base.
I hope Trump has a masterful plan B to deal with this. Releasing all this guy's records may be a good start.
An appeals court judge has ruled against the Trump Administration fornot being zealous enough in bringing an MS-13 gangster and human trafficker back from El Salvador.
The court said it won't "micromanage" a lower court even while admitting the President has the authority to take this action:
'While we fully respect the Executive’s robust assertion of its Article II powers, we shall not micromanage the efforts of a fine district judge attempting to implement the Supreme Court’s recent decision.'
If the President has "robust Article II powers" then it's a lower court that is usurping power and it was the duty of this court to overturn the idjit.
This is proof that we do NOT have a remedy for out orf control courts. The judiciary will protect it's own power first. That was the problem we had when we allowed the courts to usurp the authority of judicial review in the first place (and they usurped it in Marbury v. Madison; it is NOT found in the Constitution.)
Congress can deal with this easily enough; they can simply "uncreate" these activist courts. Yes, they can impeach, but the likelihood of getting sixty votes in the Senate is slim. But these courts were created by an act of Congress and they simply be uncreated. But of course the GOP is too chicken to do that.
So that forces Trump into the Andrew Jackson defeanse.
This whole thing was pre-planned, a careffully-orchestrated plot to trap Trump. Much like J6 is appearing to have been a devil's scheme, so too is this; the Democrats were looking for a person that they could rally behind as "illegally deported" so as to frame Trump as a monster who will deport Americans when it suits his needs. They were looking for just such an opportunity. I know this because of the way the media has portrayed this guy; a good family Maryland man. The reality is two different judges declared he was MS-13, and he had been under a deportation order that was suspended because he said he "feared for his life" in El Salvador. He was also a wife-beater and his wife filed an order of protection against him. He has been accused of human trafficking - the worst sort of crime. The media started that imeediately, telling me he was the guy they had been hoping to find.
IF Trump obeys the courts here he will then have a blizzard of such orders coming from all directions and he knows it. Also, the Democrats will then say Trump is importing domestic terrorists and human traffickers, much as they accused George H. W. Bush of being a tax and spend guy after they begged him to raise taxes and break his "read my lips" pledge. If Trump brings this guy back he'll be the poster child of every Democratic ad in the next election. And of course it will be the big win his base needs to reivigorate itself.
Trump understand all this, I suspect, which is why he's going to the mat on this now.
Meanwhile, Judge Bozoberg, er, Boasberg is still trying subvert the law and force Trump to suspend all deportation flights out of the country.
To quoute Andrew Jackson "it's his ruling, let him enforce it" when threatening to disregard John Marshall and the Supreme Court in Worcester v. Georgia.
Boasberg would need to send a referral for prosecution to the Trump Justice Department.
In Federalist 78 Alexander Hamilton argued for the Court and lifetime apppointments by pointing out it is the weakest of the three branches and has neither it's own money nor it's own enforcement power so was not to be feared. By extension that means an out-of-control judiciary could be ignored or defunded.
But we have turned it into a godlike apparatus and everyone is terrified of telling the courts to bugger off. But there comes a time when it must be done.
And actually it has repeatedly. Joe Biden simply disregarded the Supreme Court when he pushed ahead with his scheme to forgive student loans. Barack Hussein Obama (peace be upon him) ignored the courts many times, including his scheme to let the DREAMERS stay in the country when there was no law on the books permitting that. When Obama lost in court over surveillance of citizens he went to a secret FISA court and simply ignored the actual judiciary. When a Federal judge said he could not issue amnesties he simply ignored the ruling and did it anyway.
I could go on and on but the point is made; the Democrats have no problem with ignoring courts when it suits them. It's only when a Republican does it that they suddenly discover the Rule of Law.
At any rate, to return to Garcia, he needs to be indicted and face arrest and imprisonment as soon as he gets off the plane so that he is not mingling with the general public. It certainly can't be that hard to build a case against this scumbag. He should be given housing next door to the judge too.
The Democrats are going to try to impeach Trump over this if they win Congress in the next election (something they may well do). That was the whole point. That and terrifying the foolish and ginning up their base.
I hope Trump has a masterful plan B to deal with this. Releasing all this guy's records may be a good start.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:17 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 916 words, total size 6 kb.
The New World Order Religion
Timothy Birdnow
Here is an essay on the New World Order's woke religion. It's nothing we haven't been saying here at the Aviary for a long time, but it's worthy of a gander.
It is, the author argues, a religion of evil, part of the rebellion of Lucifer. I concur.
Take a couple of minutes to read it anyway.
Here is an essay on the New World Order's woke religion. It's nothing we haven't been saying here at the Aviary for a long time, but it's worthy of a gander.
It is, the author argues, a religion of evil, part of the rebellion of Lucifer. I concur.
Take a couple of minutes to read it anyway.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:57 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
Real I.D. Mishmash
Dana Mathewson on the his experience getting the Real I.D.:
This Real ID thing is, if you ask me, a whole lot of smoke but no fire. My wife and I went through the rigmarole of getting them this year. I had no trouble, but my wife had a lot of fuss. She's been married three times, with me being number three. All three marriages are nicely documented, and so are her two divorces, all with stamped and embossed certificates. And so is her birth certificate. But the first functionary at the Motor Vehicles Bureau who looked at everything was apparently overwhelmed by the volume of paperwork and just said "We can't accept all this." My wife said "Yes you can," and walked her through the paperwork piece by piece, and after the girl had called in somebody else to help her, she finally got everything approved and took my wife over to take her photo. Meanwhile I was waiting because mine was all done.
Six weeks later we got our new licenses, and they don't look a damn bit different from the old ones. I'm just waiting to present mine somewhere and have some a**hole say "This isn't a Real ID."
This Real ID thing is, if you ask me, a whole lot of smoke but no fire. My wife and I went through the rigmarole of getting them this year. I had no trouble, but my wife had a lot of fuss. She's been married three times, with me being number three. All three marriages are nicely documented, and so are her two divorces, all with stamped and embossed certificates. And so is her birth certificate. But the first functionary at the Motor Vehicles Bureau who looked at everything was apparently overwhelmed by the volume of paperwork and just said "We can't accept all this." My wife said "Yes you can," and walked her through the paperwork piece by piece, and after the girl had called in somebody else to help her, she finally got everything approved and took my wife over to take her photo. Meanwhile I was waiting because mine was all done.
Six weeks later we got our new licenses, and they don't look a damn bit different from the old ones. I'm just waiting to present mine somewhere and have some a**hole say "This isn't a Real ID."
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:19 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 205 words, total size 1 kb.
April 15, 2025
Schumer Essentially Calls for Invasion of El Salvador
Timothy Birdnow
What? Trump should invade El Salvador to get this guy out?
Chuck Schumer says Trump's refusal to follow Supreme Court edict is 'dangerous and outrageous'
Schumer made the following stattementa:
It's interesting Schumer wants due process for an alien and tried to deny it to MAGA patriots exercising their right to protest at the Capitol. It's interesting he wasn't too concerned about George Zimmerman (the White Hispanic) or police officer Darren Wilson (who shot the "gentle giant" Mike Brown in Ferguson). I don't remember him getting exercised about Derrick Chauvin's due process rights. Schumer's sense of the Rule of Law and Due Process seems a big, uh, unbalanced.
The President of El Salvador won't release this guy and what is Trump supposed to do? Maybe he should doa "raid on Entebbe" style operation to rescue the dude from prison overseas?
What? Trump should invade El Salvador to get this guy out?
Chuck Schumer says Trump's refusal to follow Supreme Court edict is 'dangerous and outrageous'
Schumer made the following stattementa:
"President Bukele's comment today is pure nonsense. The law is clear, due process was grossly violated, and the Supreme Court has clearly spoken that the Trump administration must facilitate and effectuate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He should be returned to the U.S. immediately,"
"Due process and the rule of law are cornerstones of American society for citizens and noncitizens alike, and not to follow that is dangerous and outrageous. A threat to one is a threat to all.
"Due process and the rule of law are cornerstones of American society for citizens and noncitizens alike, and not to follow that is dangerous and outrageous. A threat to one is a threat to all.
It's interesting Schumer wants due process for an alien and tried to deny it to MAGA patriots exercising their right to protest at the Capitol. It's interesting he wasn't too concerned about George Zimmerman (the White Hispanic) or police officer Darren Wilson (who shot the "gentle giant" Mike Brown in Ferguson). I don't remember him getting exercised about Derrick Chauvin's due process rights. Schumer's sense of the Rule of Law and Due Process seems a big, uh, unbalanced.
The President of El Salvador won't release this guy and what is Trump supposed to do? Maybe he should doa "raid on Entebbe" style operation to rescue the dude from prison overseas?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:02 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 230 words, total size 2 kb.
Roasting Noem
Timothy Birdnow
But a big part of the strategy to get people out and keep them out is to publicize arrests and raids. You won't get anywhere if what you are doing is secret. The whole point is to dissuade people from coming, or encourage them to leave.'
Kristi Noem’s Made-for-TV Approach to Homeland Security
This is a Wall Street Journal story, and they have always wanted open borders.
I'm not a huge fan of Noem, but her approach is sound. It's not about ARRESTING people but deporting them - and getting them to not come in the first place. That requires publicity.
While I find Noem wearing fatigues rather silly I do think her publicizing what she is doing is a smart idea. You go girl!
But a big part of the strategy to get people out and keep them out is to publicize arrests and raids. You won't get anywhere if what you are doing is secret. The whole point is to dissuade people from coming, or encourage them to leave.'
Kristi Noem’s Made-for-TV Approach to Homeland Security
This is a Wall Street Journal story, and they have always wanted open borders.
I'm not a huge fan of Noem, but her approach is sound. It's not about ARRESTING people but deporting them - and getting them to not come in the first place. That requires publicity.
While I find Noem wearing fatigues rather silly I do think her publicizing what she is doing is a smart idea. You go girl!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:10 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 129 words, total size 1 kb.
Real I.D., Real Bad
Timothy Birdnow
As of May 7 the Federal government will require all Americans to have a so-called "real i.d." to board airplanes or other public transportation, to enter Federal buildings, or to go to nuclear power plants (Drat and double drat! Now what am I going to do for recreation!)
Q quick thought; the Democrats tell us the poor and immigrants are incapable of obtaining driver's lisences and that it is an undue burdon on them to present them when voting, yet they are apparently fine with making them get a real i.d., which entials presenting a birth certificate, social security card, and proof of residency. It's MUCH harder to get the federal i.d. than a state one, yet the Dems are perfectly happy with discriminating against the poor and immigrants in this way but won't allow anyone to prove they actually are who they say and are eligible to vote.
IF the Democrats truly believe their own arguments about voting they would demand the law be rescinded over the real i.d. Their arguments are even more salient in this case. But they remain strangely silent.
And will you kill more people with a bomb on an airplane than a bomb at the polls? I've been at the polling places on big elections and there were hundreds of people who would die if someone smuggled in a bomb, and nobody is there doing security. Why do you need to inconvenience the average American at the airport but not at the polling place?
I wish Trump would twist Mike Johnson's arm and get this silly law repealed. It is nothing but a power grab by the Feds. Furthermore, have any of the post-911 reforms actually saved lives? We don't know. Granted, they haven't pulled off another 911 style hijacking, but they tipped their hand then and such a trick has diminishing returns. I suspect we did as well or better before creating the TSA and all the rest. Many airports have gone away from using TSA screeners because they are basically the post-office who give body cavity searches.
The real i.d. will be easy to circumvent and only will end up applying to honest folks. But then, in my mind, it always WAS intended for that, to give the Federal Government greater control and knowledge of the whereabouts of the citizenry. Stopping terrorism was secondary.
As of May 7 the Federal government will require all Americans to have a so-called "real i.d." to board airplanes or other public transportation, to enter Federal buildings, or to go to nuclear power plants (Drat and double drat! Now what am I going to do for recreation!)
Q quick thought; the Democrats tell us the poor and immigrants are incapable of obtaining driver's lisences and that it is an undue burdon on them to present them when voting, yet they are apparently fine with making them get a real i.d., which entials presenting a birth certificate, social security card, and proof of residency. It's MUCH harder to get the federal i.d. than a state one, yet the Dems are perfectly happy with discriminating against the poor and immigrants in this way but won't allow anyone to prove they actually are who they say and are eligible to vote.
IF the Democrats truly believe their own arguments about voting they would demand the law be rescinded over the real i.d. Their arguments are even more salient in this case. But they remain strangely silent.
And will you kill more people with a bomb on an airplane than a bomb at the polls? I've been at the polling places on big elections and there were hundreds of people who would die if someone smuggled in a bomb, and nobody is there doing security. Why do you need to inconvenience the average American at the airport but not at the polling place?
I wish Trump would twist Mike Johnson's arm and get this silly law repealed. It is nothing but a power grab by the Feds. Furthermore, have any of the post-911 reforms actually saved lives? We don't know. Granted, they haven't pulled off another 911 style hijacking, but they tipped their hand then and such a trick has diminishing returns. I suspect we did as well or better before creating the TSA and all the rest. Many airports have gone away from using TSA screeners because they are basically the post-office who give body cavity searches.
The real i.d. will be easy to circumvent and only will end up applying to honest folks. But then, in my mind, it always WAS intended for that, to give the Federal Government greater control and knowledge of the whereabouts of the citizenry. Stopping terrorism was secondary.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:43 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 398 words, total size 2 kb.
Weaponizing Justice
Timothy Birdnow
Investigations into Civil Rights violations in public education doubled under Joe Biden.
Such investigations were a tool to enforce content control of what these institutions were teaching.
This was done under the auspices of the Office of Civil Rights (OCR), which Donald Trump is asttempting to defund.Naturally they've filed a lawsuit with a rent-a-judge to force Trump to give them money. OCR is under the Department of Education.
The article states:
Anyone who believes this is intended to do anything except political activism is seriously deluded; the way it's set up is to empower Leftist activism.
Defense of Freedom Institute co-found Jim Blew said:
So this agency makes it into a national policy issue and not just an isolated incident. This is how you fundamentally transform a society.
Many of the complaints received by OCR were filed by just one person, leading us to suspect an attempt to pad the books.
According to the article:
Looks to me like it was possibly someone from OCR itself padding the complaints to justify a bigger budget.
During the Biden years complaints exploded and the types of complaints changes. Disability complaints used to compromise the majority, but under Biden they switched to sexual discrimination complaints. Why do you suppose that is? I rather suspect it tied in with the "gender" nonsense.
At any rate the hyenas are howling now as they watch their tools taken from them. Outfits like this are and always were about social change and not about justice.
Investigations into Civil Rights violations in public education doubled under Joe Biden.
Such investigations were a tool to enforce content control of what these institutions were teaching.
This was done under the auspices of the Office of Civil Rights (OCR), which Donald Trump is asttempting to defund.Naturally they've filed a lawsuit with a rent-a-judge to force Trump to give them money. OCR is under the Department of Education.
The article states:
"A complainant does not need a personal connection to a school. Indeed, petitioners don’t even have to live in the same state, and legal standing is not a factor. They do not even need to identify themselves. They are not required to try to resolve their problems at the local level before notifying the feds – though many do. Consequently, the office’s operations sometimes function as a nationwide anonymous sounding board rather than a source of last resort, a place where anyone can make a federal case out of any slight, real or perceived.
Although OCR probes include many serious allegations, the system’s structure means the number of cases can be inflated through duplication, serial filers and ambitious bureaucrats.
"The numbers aren’t really what they first appear,” said Teresa R. Manning, policy director at the National Association of Scholars, a conservative counterweight in higher education to the liberal American Association of University Professors. "A lot of this was by design. If they didn’t have complaints, they wouldn’t have jobs, so a lot of federal bureaucrats and campus officers want any grievance to become a federal case.”
Although OCR probes include many serious allegations, the system’s structure means the number of cases can be inflated through duplication, serial filers and ambitious bureaucrats.
"The numbers aren’t really what they first appear,” said Teresa R. Manning, policy director at the National Association of Scholars, a conservative counterweight in higher education to the liberal American Association of University Professors. "A lot of this was by design. If they didn’t have complaints, they wouldn’t have jobs, so a lot of federal bureaucrats and campus officers want any grievance to become a federal case.”
Anyone who believes this is intended to do anything except political activism is seriously deluded; the way it's set up is to empower Leftist activism.
Defense of Freedom Institute co-found Jim Blew said:
"Skepticism is legitimate, because by declaring something is ‘systemic,’ then rather than resolve that one issue they can turn it into a federal case,”
So this agency makes it into a national policy issue and not just an isolated incident. This is how you fundamentally transform a society.
Many of the complaints received by OCR were filed by just one person, leading us to suspect an attempt to pad the books.
According to the article:
"Also, totals were swollen by one unnamed individual. For example, in 2022 when OCR received 9,948 complaints of Title IX violations, nearly three out of four – 7,339 – came from this person. That same individual slipped a bit the following year, accounting for only 69% of the 5,590 complaints. RCI asked several people familiar with Office of Civil Rights work who this person might be, but none said they know.
Looks to me like it was possibly someone from OCR itself padding the complaints to justify a bigger budget.
During the Biden years complaints exploded and the types of complaints changes. Disability complaints used to compromise the majority, but under Biden they switched to sexual discrimination complaints. Why do you suppose that is? I rather suspect it tied in with the "gender" nonsense.
At any rate the hyenas are howling now as they watch their tools taken from them. Outfits like this are and always were about social change and not about justice.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:24 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 533 words, total size 4 kb.
Outing Their Inner Stalin
Timothy Birdnow
To illustrate how really dim witted the Left truly is we have this little gem; Lefties believe Trump is going to declare martial law and make himself dictator because he asked the heads of Homeland Security and Defense to prepare a report making a determination of whether he should invoke the Insurrectio Act to secure the southern border. Naturally they think it is a prelude to goose-stepping thugs in black seizing the country and sending dissidents to El Salvadorian concentration camps.
The crazy conspiracy theory started with the San Francisco Chronicle's article which argued:
If you are going to seize power why ask your cabinet to produce a report giving recommendations to that effect? Wouldn't you hide it? Wouldn't you just do it? Time is of the essence in any coup.
And of course this acts as though we do not have a record of Mr. Trump's to analyze. Trump was very carefful to observe the law when he was President before. He undoubtedly wanted to send in troops to quell rebellion in places like Portland Oregon but did not do so. Why? Because Federalism required the state governors to ask him for help. Without a requst for the National Guard Trump's hands were tied. He respected the Rule of Law.
Liberals live inside their heads and not in the real world and this is what THEY would do if the situation was reversed so they assume Trump will do it too.
Here is what the order actually says:
This article goes on to chronicle the crazed musings of a screwball called Aletheisthenes who prophecies an October Revolution by Trump in April:
This Allosaurus fellow, or whatever his name may be, really believes we have a RIGHT WING MEDIA in the tank FOR TRUMP! Sheesh; what a Maroon, as Bugs Bunny would say!
I would like to know how he thinks invoking the Insurrection Act at the border would translate into seizing cities across the country, cities like Chicago or Milwaukee or Denver? The Insurrection Act ONLY authorizes the President to deploy the military to specified places, and only on invitation by the Governor or Legislature of that particular state. It' useless as a toolf ro seizing power across the country. At best (or worst, depending on your viewpoint) Trump could send troops to states that are already friendly to him. Not much use in that, is there?
Here's his list of events as he sees them unfolding:
So it never occurres to Big Al that the obvious solution is for Leftist across the country to NOT riot, not loot and burn and break windows and beat people in the street. Trump will have nothing if they don't give him anything,by this guy's own reasoning.
He is basically saying Trump will impose the Insurrection Act over, oh, I don't know, INSURRECTION and he's evil for doing so!
He convieniently forgets who actually did that - Joe Biden, who tried to use the Insurrection Act against MAGA people when they protested at the Capitol on Jan 6, 2021. In other words it was the very policies of his own he is now projecting onto Trump. It's always projection with the Left. Who historically has used insurrections to overthrow govenrments? Almost all historical examples are Communists overthrowing the established governments - not Conservatives. There are just two examples of the opposite - the American Revolution, which was no reveloution at all but a secession from the British Empire by well-established governments and the Nazi takeover of Germany, and Nazis are not right wing but Leftists. Oh, and they were elected to power anyway. They merely stampeded the hopelessly corrupt German parliament after the Reichstag fire. The point is THAT about runs the whole gammut of historical examples of "right wing" insurrections. We have every Communist regime on Earth to point to Left wing attempts to do likewise.
Where were the revolutionaries during the Biden era? There have been three attempts on Trump's life as of now and yet there was little effort to kill Mr. Biden, at least by our side. We now see people's Teslas being torched or vandalized; never happened to anything the Liberals owned back then, did it? If WE were the ones plotting a takeover wouldn't there have been violence during Biden's Administration? Even though we felt cheated in the election of '20 there was no violence, except a minor outbreak at the Capitol and only once.
If you ever want to see what the Left is planning themselves just look at what they accuse us of doing. They will out their own inner Stalin every time.
To illustrate how really dim witted the Left truly is we have this little gem; Lefties believe Trump is going to declare martial law and make himself dictator because he asked the heads of Homeland Security and Defense to prepare a report making a determination of whether he should invoke the Insurrectio Act to secure the southern border. Naturally they think it is a prelude to goose-stepping thugs in black seizing the country and sending dissidents to El Salvadorian concentration camps.
The crazy conspiracy theory started with the San Francisco Chronicle's article which argued:
" The clock is ticking down on a crucial but little-noticed part of President Donald Trump’s first round of executive orders — the one tasking the secretaries of the Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security to submit a joint report, within 90 days, recommending "whether to invoke the Insurrection Act.”
Many of us are now holding our collective breath, knowing that the report and what it contains could put us on the slippery slope toward unchecked presidential power under a man with an affinity for ironfisted dictators.
Many of us are now holding our collective breath, knowing that the report and what it contains could put us on the slippery slope toward unchecked presidential power under a man with an affinity for ironfisted dictators.
If you are going to seize power why ask your cabinet to produce a report giving recommendations to that effect? Wouldn't you hide it? Wouldn't you just do it? Time is of the essence in any coup.
And of course this acts as though we do not have a record of Mr. Trump's to analyze. Trump was very carefful to observe the law when he was President before. He undoubtedly wanted to send in troops to quell rebellion in places like Portland Oregon but did not do so. Why? Because Federalism required the state governors to ask him for help. Without a requst for the National Guard Trump's hands were tied. He respected the Rule of Law.
Liberals live inside their heads and not in the real world and this is what THEY would do if the situation was reversed so they assume Trump will do it too.
Here is what the order actually says:
"Within 90 days of the date of this proclamation, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit a joint report to the President about the conditions at the southern border of the United States and any recommendations regarding additional actions that may be necessary to obtain complete operational control of the southern border, including whether to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807.
This article goes on to chronicle the crazed musings of a screwball called Aletheisthenes who prophecies an October Revolution by Trump in April:
" And as his two months in office has already shown, he won’t stop at just a legal opinion.
Expect an executive order even that same day or the next, officially declaring the Insurrection Act, restricting freedoms in the name of restoring control of the border and perhaps in blue-state cities, and setting the larger plan in motion.
Of course, this won’t be framed as an attack on democracy. It will be packaged as a necessary response to crisis — as authoritarian takeovers always are.
But once it happens, there’s no going back.
This will be the point of no return.
On or slightly after April 20th, 2025, Trump will most likely sign an executive order invoking the Insurrection Act.
The excuse will be to secure the border and deport violent gang member illegal aliens, and possibly bring order to out-of-control cities, but it will actually be the first step to eventually fully declare martial law across the United States, and suspend civil liberties, and the US Constitution.
To most it will come without warning. The press might not even report on it until the last minute. When it happens, expect confusion, misinformation, and panic. Many will be caught off guard.
Expect an executive order even that same day or the next, officially declaring the Insurrection Act, restricting freedoms in the name of restoring control of the border and perhaps in blue-state cities, and setting the larger plan in motion.
Of course, this won’t be framed as an attack on democracy. It will be packaged as a necessary response to crisis — as authoritarian takeovers always are.
But once it happens, there’s no going back.
This will be the point of no return.
On or slightly after April 20th, 2025, Trump will most likely sign an executive order invoking the Insurrection Act.
The excuse will be to secure the border and deport violent gang member illegal aliens, and possibly bring order to out-of-control cities, but it will actually be the first step to eventually fully declare martial law across the United States, and suspend civil liberties, and the US Constitution.
To most it will come without warning. The press might not even report on it until the last minute. When it happens, expect confusion, misinformation, and panic. Many will be caught off guard.
This Allosaurus fellow, or whatever his name may be, really believes we have a RIGHT WING MEDIA in the tank FOR TRUMP! Sheesh; what a Maroon, as Bugs Bunny would say!
I would like to know how he thinks invoking the Insurrection Act at the border would translate into seizing cities across the country, cities like Chicago or Milwaukee or Denver? The Insurrection Act ONLY authorizes the President to deploy the military to specified places, and only on invitation by the Governor or Legislature of that particular state. It' useless as a toolf ro seizing power across the country. At best (or worst, depending on your viewpoint) Trump could send troops to states that are already friendly to him. Not much use in that, is there?
Here's his list of events as he sees them unfolding:
1. "Resist!” Demonstrations Grow — Just As Planned
2. The False Flag Crisis: Turning Protest into "Terror”
3. Trump Declares Expanded Martial Law — And Calls for Militia to assist the police and Military
4. Mass Arrests of Opposition Leaders
5. Military & National Guard Take Over Major Cities
6. Press Censorship & Total Media Control
7. Borders Close & Dissidents Are Trapped Inside
8. Elections Are "Postponed” Indefinitely
2. The False Flag Crisis: Turning Protest into "Terror”
3. Trump Declares Expanded Martial Law — And Calls for Militia to assist the police and Military
4. Mass Arrests of Opposition Leaders
5. Military & National Guard Take Over Major Cities
6. Press Censorship & Total Media Control
7. Borders Close & Dissidents Are Trapped Inside
8. Elections Are "Postponed” Indefinitely
So it never occurres to Big Al that the obvious solution is for Leftist across the country to NOT riot, not loot and burn and break windows and beat people in the street. Trump will have nothing if they don't give him anything,by this guy's own reasoning.
He is basically saying Trump will impose the Insurrection Act over, oh, I don't know, INSURRECTION and he's evil for doing so!
He convieniently forgets who actually did that - Joe Biden, who tried to use the Insurrection Act against MAGA people when they protested at the Capitol on Jan 6, 2021. In other words it was the very policies of his own he is now projecting onto Trump. It's always projection with the Left. Who historically has used insurrections to overthrow govenrments? Almost all historical examples are Communists overthrowing the established governments - not Conservatives. There are just two examples of the opposite - the American Revolution, which was no reveloution at all but a secession from the British Empire by well-established governments and the Nazi takeover of Germany, and Nazis are not right wing but Leftists. Oh, and they were elected to power anyway. They merely stampeded the hopelessly corrupt German parliament after the Reichstag fire. The point is THAT about runs the whole gammut of historical examples of "right wing" insurrections. We have every Communist regime on Earth to point to Left wing attempts to do likewise.
Where were the revolutionaries during the Biden era? There have been three attempts on Trump's life as of now and yet there was little effort to kill Mr. Biden, at least by our side. We now see people's Teslas being torched or vandalized; never happened to anything the Liberals owned back then, did it? If WE were the ones plotting a takeover wouldn't there have been violence during Biden's Administration? Even though we felt cheated in the election of '20 there was no violence, except a minor outbreak at the Capitol and only once.
If you ever want to see what the Left is planning themselves just look at what they accuse us of doing. They will out their own inner Stalin every time.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:22 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1200 words, total size 8 kb.
April 14, 2025
Higher Ed Slush Fund
Timothy Birdnow
Can you say "slush fund"?
Harvard Professors Try Blocking Audit Into Billions in Government Grants
Bet most of that money went to Democrat party funding.
Can you say "slush fund"?
Harvard Professors Try Blocking Audit Into Billions in Government Grants
Bet most of that money went to Democrat party funding.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:00 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
Harvard Hiding Funding
Timothy Birdnow
Can you say "slush fund"?
Harvard Professors Try Blocking Audit Into Billions in Government Grants
Bet most of that money went to Democrat party funding.
Can you say "slush fund"?
Harvard Professors Try Blocking Audit Into Billions in Government Grants
Bet most of that money went to Democrat party funding.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:50 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
Another Attempt on Trump's Life
Timothy Birdnow
Another assassination attempt on Trump, this time by a kid who first murdered his parents.
Federal agents claim he was a neo-Nazi with literature about Naziism and "saving the white race".
Interesting; I thought Trump was supposed to be one of them. Now we find Nazis trying to kill him? Or is this a lile to hide the fact this kid - who obviosly has an eastern European heritage being named Nikita Casap. I can't swear that is a Russian name but it seems likely. Casap was in communication with someone speaking Russian so it may well be he was a recruit by Russian intelligence to take out Trump.
He murdered his mother Tatiana - age 35 - and his stepfather Donald Mayer, 51 in an effort to steal their money to finance the scheme. (Does anyone find this marriage improbable in the first place? Mayer was 16 years older than his bride.)
So either the Russians had a hand in it or the CIA is making it LOOK like the Russians.
Casap left a manifesto - bet we don't see it.
Another assassination attempt on Trump, this time by a kid who first murdered his parents.
Federal agents claim he was a neo-Nazi with literature about Naziism and "saving the white race".
Interesting; I thought Trump was supposed to be one of them. Now we find Nazis trying to kill him? Or is this a lile to hide the fact this kid - who obviosly has an eastern European heritage being named Nikita Casap. I can't swear that is a Russian name but it seems likely. Casap was in communication with someone speaking Russian so it may well be he was a recruit by Russian intelligence to take out Trump.
He murdered his mother Tatiana - age 35 - and his stepfather Donald Mayer, 51 in an effort to steal their money to finance the scheme. (Does anyone find this marriage improbable in the first place? Mayer was 16 years older than his bride.)
So either the Russians had a hand in it or the CIA is making it LOOK like the Russians.
Casap left a manifesto - bet we don't see it.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:11 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 189 words, total size 1 kb.
ABC Lies About Tornadoes
Timothy Birdnow
The Absolute Bullcrap Netword aka ABC spreads misinformation about recent tornadoes.
No ABC: Climate Change Didn't Cause 2025's Severe Tornado Outbreak
The Absolute Bullcrap Netword aka ABC spreads misinformation about recent tornadoes.
No ABC: Climate Change Didn't Cause 2025's Severe Tornado Outbreak
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:58 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
<< Page 1 of 906 >>
89kb generated in CPU 0.271, elapsed 1.0386 seconds.
45 queries taking 1.0247 seconds, 230 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
45 queries taking 1.0247 seconds, 230 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
