June 20, 2023
Factual context of the specific case is everything in justice.
And the factual context in the Trump indictment is that it is obvious
that the Biden government is engaged in an illegal bill of attainder
targeting Trump. Trump’s boxes, as ex-president, are his, and there was
no evidence of any national security issue, in this ex-president’s
situation. The DOJ simply had no national security warrant for any
invasive search and seizure of Trump’s boxes or home. It is pathetic
that judges issuing such a warrant—relying
Agreed. Trump was only following a well-worn legal precedent, one set by former Presidents including Bill Clinto, who actually won in court over this very thing. Precedent is important in law, not just statute. (Actually both are on Mr. Trump's side as the Presidential Records Act makes this whole case a moot point.)
Trump isn't stupid. He knew they were coming after him. He undoubtedly consulted his attorneys when they began hounding him for these records.
I saw Brett Baier interview Trump yesterday on Fox, and the fat fascist kept hammering Trump about comments he made about hiding the evidence. Well duh! While it wasn't illegal it would give the media a hayday if they could find anything that was classified - even though Trump had all the authority needed to declassify them.
(BTW Baier hammered Trump on the 2020 election fraud too and wouldn't let him answer the questions posed. He kept insisting there was no evidence and that Trump had lost all lawsuits. I could have provided him with multiple pieces of evidence if the lazy grease stain would have bothered to ask me. Fox is utterly determined to denounce the truth of 2020.)
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:43 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 375 words, total size 2 kb.
35 queries taking 0.3313 seconds, 182 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
