July 15, 2021
Nailed it. Eugenics was "the right thing to do" as far as governments and big think tanks were concerned, and they took steps to sterilize people with epilepsy or people with head injuries or those with learning disabilities who they feared would "infect" future generations. And of course this extended to black people, and eventually to Jewish folks, the "undesirables" who "carried" these "diseases".
But they could make the argument it was for the public good.
So I ask Scott Mase, if eugenics was wrong, why is tampering with people's genomes via a vaccination not wrong? Why is refusing to take the jab wrong? I guess it was wrong for those who tried to refuse to be sterilized back in the days of eugenics too; they clearly didn't care about their fellow Americans. I guess it was wrong of Jews to flee Nazi Germany as they owed humanity their elimination?
Where do we draw the line with the "public interest"?
Fay Voshell
I'd say this is from the dark side.
Transgender Couple Pushing their Newborn to Suck a Man's Chest
This is an attempt to overturn reality by cooperating with the rulers of the darkness of this world, with spiritual wickedness in high places.
They are trying hard to change created reality--knocking their heads against natural law and expecting the Church to conform to their gnostic views. Some battles never cease.
We cannot bow down to the lies.
I think C.S. Lewis commented brilliantly on witches--in fact, the vanishing of the concept that humans can subject themselves to evil powers and act accordingly--a Christian concept. "Three hundred years ago people in England were putting witches to death. Was that what you call the 'Rule of Human Nature or Right Conduct?’ But surely the reason we do not execute witches is that we do not believe there are such things. If we did—if we really thought that there were people going about who had sold themselves to the devil and received supernatural powers from him in return and were using these powers to kill their neighbors or drive them mad or bring bad weather—surely we would all agree that if anyone deserved the death penalty, then these filthy quislings did? There is no difference of moral principle here: the difference is simply about matter of fact. It may be a great advance in knowledge not to believe in witches: there is no moral advance in not executing them when you do not think they are there. You would not call a man humane for ceasing to set mousetraps if he did so because he believed there were no mice in the house.â€
Tim adds:
Notice how they are doing this to an infant. Reminds me of how witches used baby's blood in rituals because it was supposedly more powerful.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:41 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 505 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at July 16, 2021 01:56 PM (A0QQk)
These people truly are insane.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at July 17, 2021 07:02 AM (HUTDW)
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at July 17, 2021 10:31 PM (A0QQk)
Posted by: Percy Wells at December 24, 2021 03:23 AM (cD6Os)
Posted by: Percy Wells at December 24, 2021 03:28 AM (cD6Os)
Posted by: Percy Wells at December 24, 2021 03:32 AM (cD6Os)
Posted by: Sarah Cohen at January 14, 2022 05:22 AM (/wTXY)
Posted by: Sarah Cohen at January 14, 2022 05:24 AM (/wTXY)
Posted by: Sarah Cohen at January 14, 2022 05:25 AM (/wTXY)
Posted by: Sarah Cohen at January 14, 2022 05:27 AM (/wTXY)
Posted by: Sarah Cohen at January 31, 2022 12:19 PM (K5vJz)
Posted by: Anonymous at March 19, 2022 12:21 AM (lK0+f)
37 queries taking 0.2625 seconds, 183 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.