October 04, 2025
Wikipedia Gets Soros Money
Timothy Birdnow
We all suspected it to be true but now we know.
Shocker: Soros-Backed Tides Foundation Funding Wikipedia
Wikipedia is horribly biased and when a conservative tries to edit any wrongful information his edits are removed - even from top people in their field. S. Fred Singer used to complain bitterly about how his climate edits were simply removed, even though he was one of the most respected climatologists in America but he disagreeed with tha alarmist view. He didn't remove the alarmism from the article, just added some solid science.
And Wikipedia always comes up in the first position when doing a Google search. It's CROWD SOURCED which means it's hardly an authoritative study of facts, yet it is always at the top and the average person just looks at Wikipedia and nothing else. (I know my oldest brother does that.)
After reading about this Elon Musk deccided to launch Grokpedia, a competitor to Wikipedia. I doubt Google will give it a high rating, meaning few will see it.
Zero Hedge points out:
Yeah; a real reliable source of imformation!
The AI sources that are now available pull information heavily from Wikipedia and other Left-wing operations. Musk is simply trying to balance them out.
Control of information is the way the Left has risen to holding America and the world in thrall to their insane beliefs. They have power over information that the most despotic tyrants could only dream of, and they can control the thinking of the masses without a huge espionage state, but rather just by pretending they are independent entitites while all ships sail in the same direction. Wikipedia and Google are two cornerstones of that power.
God bless Elon Musk!
We all suspected it to be true but now we know.
Shocker: Soros-Backed Tides Foundation Funding Wikipedia
Wikipedia is horribly biased and when a conservative tries to edit any wrongful information his edits are removed - even from top people in their field. S. Fred Singer used to complain bitterly about how his climate edits were simply removed, even though he was one of the most respected climatologists in America but he disagreeed with tha alarmist view. He didn't remove the alarmism from the article, just added some solid science.
And Wikipedia always comes up in the first position when doing a Google search. It's CROWD SOURCED which means it's hardly an authoritative study of facts, yet it is always at the top and the average person just looks at Wikipedia and nothing else. (I know my oldest brother does that.)
After reading about this Elon Musk deccided to launch Grokpedia, a competitor to Wikipedia. I doubt Google will give it a high rating, meaning few will see it.
Zero Hedge points out:
Here are all of Wikipedia's "reliable source". They include
MSNBC
NYT
Huffpost
Reddit
Snopes
Politifact
Rolling Stone
The Atlantic
Propublica
NPR
GLAADhttps://t.co/WvT6oEn7ag https://t.co/GsmWnpEA15
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) September 30, 2025
MSNBC
NYT
Huffpost
Snopes
Politifact
Rolling Stone
The Atlantic
Propublica
NPR
GLAADhttps://t.co/WvT6oEn7ag https://t.co/GsmWnpEA15
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) September 30, 2025
Yeah; a real reliable source of imformation!
The AI sources that are now available pull information heavily from Wikipedia and other Left-wing operations. Musk is simply trying to balance them out.
Control of information is the way the Left has risen to holding America and the world in thrall to their insane beliefs. They have power over information that the most despotic tyrants could only dream of, and they can control the thinking of the masses without a huge espionage state, but rather just by pretending they are independent entitites while all ships sail in the same direction. Wikipedia and Google are two cornerstones of that power.
God bless Elon Musk!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:51 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 319 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Yes indeed! At this point in time I feel confident in saying that Trump and Musk are two of the greatest men of the 21st Century, bar none.
Partly because of Musk I have been toying with the idea of opening a Twitter/X account; the only thing stopping me is that awhile back I had a Parler account and found it to be a huge time suck. And I doubt that on X I could actually contact some of the high-power people whom I'd really like to influence -- for example, I'd like to contact Greg Gutfeld and tell him that Jessica Tarlov is really pulling the quality of discourse on "The View" way down every time she opens her yap. I could tell him that, but he wouldn't listen.
Partly because of Musk I have been toying with the idea of opening a Twitter/X account; the only thing stopping me is that awhile back I had a Parler account and found it to be a huge time suck. And I doubt that on X I could actually contact some of the high-power people whom I'd really like to influence -- for example, I'd like to contact Greg Gutfeld and tell him that Jessica Tarlov is really pulling the quality of discourse on "The View" way down every time she opens her yap. I could tell him that, but he wouldn't listen.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at October 07, 2025 11:38 PM (i02lT)
2
Duh! I meant "The Five." If Tarlov were on "The View" she'd enhance it even if she only belched.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at October 13, 2025 09:34 PM (i02lT)
24kb generated in CPU 0.0166, elapsed 0.1938 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.1834 seconds, 185 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.1834 seconds, 185 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
