September 13, 2025
Why Didn't He Take the Gun?
Timothy Birdnow
I have a question about the murder of Charlie Kirk. Why did the killer take the weapon away from the scene of the crime but ditch it in the woods nearby? If he had been successful at smuggling it out he should logically have smuggled it WAY out so nobody would find it. The murder weapon is always a major piece of evidence. He should have disassembled it and dumped it is multiple places. But he chucked it right outside of the campus. For a man who planned this so carefully that was a major screwup.
That is why I'm not convinced he was a "lone crazed gunman" but rathersuspect he was a fall guy. Oh, I'm pretty sure he did it but I suspect he wasn't working alone.
I get it; he wouldn't want to be caught with the murder weapon. But he left evidence at the scene of the crime by leaving the gun and bullets, and he would have been safer just taking it all with him (which he did anyway after first shooting Charlie.) It seems to me if he could get it as far as the woods he could get it out completely.
And why didn't he ditch his clothes? Authorities should have found those along with the weapon.
I'm no expert but this whole thing seems odd to me.
I have a question about the murder of Charlie Kirk. Why did the killer take the weapon away from the scene of the crime but ditch it in the woods nearby? If he had been successful at smuggling it out he should logically have smuggled it WAY out so nobody would find it. The murder weapon is always a major piece of evidence. He should have disassembled it and dumped it is multiple places. But he chucked it right outside of the campus. For a man who planned this so carefully that was a major screwup.
That is why I'm not convinced he was a "lone crazed gunman" but rathersuspect he was a fall guy. Oh, I'm pretty sure he did it but I suspect he wasn't working alone.
I get it; he wouldn't want to be caught with the murder weapon. But he left evidence at the scene of the crime by leaving the gun and bullets, and he would have been safer just taking it all with him (which he did anyway after first shooting Charlie.) It seems to me if he could get it as far as the woods he could get it out completely.
And why didn't he ditch his clothes? Authorities should have found those along with the weapon.
I'm no expert but this whole thing seems odd to me.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
06:42 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 233 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The guy had jumped off a roof and was in pain and probably not thinking straight. (Well, to shoot Charlie Kirk proves he wasn't thinking straight to begin with.) Possibly the gun was proving a liability to carry at that point -- a .30-06 rifle is not the lightest firearm to carry.
In general, "the plan" goes to hell once the kill shot has been made.
In general, "the plan" goes to hell once the kill shot has been made.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 13, 2025 10:19 PM (qL1rE)
2
That makes sense Dana. It was a foolish mistake, but then he was a 22 year old liberal, and they aren't known for being the sharpest knife in the drawer.
On the other hand if there is more to this story and this guy was a patsy that's exactly how I would do it if I were the guy setting him up; tell him to ditch the gun in the woods where you know authorities could find it.
I know I'm getting paranoid, but after the things we've witnessed over the last ten years or so I think I have every right to be suspicious. Shoot; we still don't know what happened with the Trump assassination attempt, nor with many other things (like the Las Vegas country music festival shootings).
And we know our national security apparatus hates Trump. This is just how I would do it were I in their shoes (of course I wouldn't be in their shoes because I would not do such things, but I'm thinking the way I suspect they would think.)
On the other hand if there is more to this story and this guy was a patsy that's exactly how I would do it if I were the guy setting him up; tell him to ditch the gun in the woods where you know authorities could find it.
I know I'm getting paranoid, but after the things we've witnessed over the last ten years or so I think I have every right to be suspicious. Shoot; we still don't know what happened with the Trump assassination attempt, nor with many other things (like the Las Vegas country music festival shootings).
And we know our national security apparatus hates Trump. This is just how I would do it were I in their shoes (of course I wouldn't be in their shoes because I would not do such things, but I'm thinking the way I suspect they would think.)
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at September 14, 2025 07:19 AM (dptnQ)
3
As you've shown upstream from this article, the shooter's tranny boy/girlfriend was supposed to grab the gun and take it somewhere else but didn't. Guess trannies aren't greatly reliable?
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 14, 2025 11:52 PM (qL1rE)
24kb generated in CPU 0.1193, elapsed 0.2324 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2162 seconds, 186 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.2162 seconds, 186 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
