August 14, 2024

Using Children as FootSoldiers

Michael Smith

If children are our future, why are social engineering Utopians using children as psychologically engineered improvised explosive devices?

As the current wave of socially induced gender confusion rolls on, it is becoming increasingly evident that it is racking up a significant body count.

As with every single social engineering enterprise, it has followed a predictable pattern, beginning with "freeing” adults to express themselves and "identify” as whatever "gender” (a term so broad it no longer has meaning) they choose.

Understanding, as the left claims, that "children are our future”, the focus on spreading this social contagion became focused on progressively younger victims until we were told that gender "choices’ were being made by babies and children not capable of choosing what they wanted for dinner could make the decision to be male or female and be treated as adults.

"I identify as…” and "My pronouns are…” have become a statement of situational emotion, with some gender confused people claiming to be "fluid” or changing each day to whatever phony, invented definition of gender they might feel like.

As usual, the greatest damage occurs to those least capable of making decisions for themselves, the minor children. Taken at the individual level, "gender assignment” has been so radicalized, children are being permanently scarred through hormone suppressing drugs and body altering surgery, both binary decisions with irreversible, lifetime implications.

I cannot even contemplate how desperate someone must be to want to radically alter their body to achieve a biological impossibility. Such a futile effort is destined for failure every single time. The simple fact is that people are free to live their lives as they choose – if a man feels like a woman, he is free to adopt the mannerisms, the clothing, and the appearance of a woman – but he will never become a woman.

This what the support for the allegedly female Olympic boxers is about. The IOC claiming there is just no scientific way to define what a woman is, that there are bodies with male biological characteristics down to the chromosomal level that are female, is an attempt to create space for the idea that biology is wrong, there is a gray area where natural androgyny exists, and the only important thing is what an individual human believes they are.

We just went through a period where search engine giant Google was manipulating search results to hide any references to the assassination attempt on President Trump. It was claimed to be an "error,” but for years these "errors” have always favored the political left and never the political right.

That same pattern is evident in the transgender and gender fluidity contagion – it is always biological females who suffer. Every conflict is about males who pretend to be women to invade traditionally female spaces, never the other way around.

Societies have long been ordered based on obvious biological reality. Males cannot gestate children but are necessary to procreate. They are stronger, faster, more suited for activities demanding greater physical strength. Societies and civilizations die without children, so females are the basis for continuation of those societies and civilizations – and the species. Without their skills in childbearing and rearing, there is no future. Women tend to be better at emotionally nurturing and in most cased, psychologically stronger than males.

However one defines them, and no matter whether it is valid to look back in history to criticize how roles developed, successful societies and civilizations developed roles that both sexes performed to the benefit of civilization.

While societal roles can change, biological roles cannot. Males can perform many traditionally female roles in society and females can most certainly perform traditionally male roles. Modernity has brought about intellectually genderless roles that can be filled by either sex – but basic biological roles cannot ever, and will never, change.

People can "love who they love” but the reality is same sex couplings are biological dead ends. Biological males cannot become pregnant and biological females cannot produce sperm, those roles in the biological imperative of survival of the species are not subject to magical prestidigitatio n or mental whim.

The harm is that children are now being reared with no concept of the importance of those traditional roles and are being taught that biology does not matter because it is a matter of choice, not inevitability.

Using children as foot soldiers in this war of social engineering is the most self-destructiv e action a civilization can take.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 08:22 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 751 words, total size 5 kb.




What colour is a green orange?




24kb generated in CPU 0.0481, elapsed 0.5415 seconds.
35 queries taking 0.5363 seconds, 170 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
America First News
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Blaze News
Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Center for Immigration Studies
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
>Climatescepticsparty> Daily Caller News Foundation
Conservative Angle
Conservative Treehouse
Daren Jonescu
The Daily Fetched
Dana and Martha Music From the Heart Music
On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Just the Facts
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Lifezette
Let .the Truth be Told
Newsmax
>Numbers Watch
OANN
Real Climate Science
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Western Journalism
Science Daily
Science Tech Daily
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 234973
  • Files: 19112
  • Bytes: 5.1G
  • CPU Time: 427:58
  • Queries: 8661357

Content

  • Posts: 30959
  • Comments: 138172

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0