February 16, 2025
Union Insurrection
Timothy Birdnow
The Federal workforce is under the bureaucracy, and the bureacracy is under the Exectuve branch, so how is Trump's action an "aggressive moves to shrink government and expand his power"? If he's shrinking government he's REDUCING his power, isn't he? Or is the bureaucracy running their own branch of government these days? Odd; I don't recall seeing a Constitutional amendment to that effect.Fed unions take lead in resistance to Trump’s presidential power grab
The author shrieks of "power heists" and how Trump is fomenting a "constitutional crisis". Guess he never actually READ the Constitution, which does not even mention a bureaucracy, much less grant it any sort of autonomy.
So basically these are employees telling their boss they are going to sabotage him. It's an insurrection.
The article goes on to state:
No, Trump isn't saying "I have the right to do whatever I want" but rather "I have the right to manage my own employees." The Constitution makes it quite clear he's responsible, and if his employees pulled some dirty tricks on the Left these people would be screaming bloody murder about how Trump bears the final responsiblity for them. So which is it?
And they have the gall to quote Jamie Raskin:
As if the four years of Joe Biden never happened. I guess we didn't have a huge influx of illegal aliens then, in violation of our laws? I guess Biden didn't cancel the Keystone XL pipeline even though contracts were signed? I guess Biden didn't let the border wall material rot in Texas even though Congress had approved the construction of the wall? I guess Biden didn't impose his tuition waiver for students even though Congress didn't authorize it and the Courts didn't order him to stop?
The hypocrisy is astonishing; they can twist the law as they please.
These people are becoming unhinged. And insurrection is in the air. Hopefully Trump will scare them straight as they face either losing their jobs or obeying their boss.
The Federal workforce is under the bureaucracy, and the bureacracy is under the Exectuve branch, so how is Trump's action an "aggressive moves to shrink government and expand his power"? If he's shrinking government he's REDUCING his power, isn't he? Or is the bureaucracy running their own branch of government these days? Odd; I don't recall seeing a Constitutional amendment to that effect.Fed unions take lead in resistance to Trump’s presidential power grab
"Trump actions against federal employees pushed them to the forefront of resistance against his aggressive moves to shrink government and expand his power."
The author shrieks of "power heists" and how Trump is fomenting a "constitutional crisis". Guess he never actually READ the Constitution, which does not even mention a bureaucracy, much less grant it any sort of autonomy.
So basically these are employees telling their boss they are going to sabotage him. It's an insurrection.
The article goes on to state:
"Trump, however, rests his power plays on Article II’s first sentence, which says "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” In 2019, during Trump’s first term, he was clear on his strongly disputed, unique interpretation of that line: "I have the right to do whatever I want as president.” That’s his version of the unitary executive theory, which has right-wing support."
No, Trump isn't saying "I have the right to do whatever I want" but rather "I have the right to manage my own employees." The Constitution makes it quite clear he's responsible, and if his employees pulled some dirty tricks on the Left these people would be screaming bloody murder about how Trump bears the final responsiblity for them. So which is it?
And they have the gall to quote Jamie Raskin:
"Raskin pointed to the Constitution’s "core duty of the president” to "take care that the laws are faithfully executed, not frustrated, not defeated, not rewritten, not overturned"
As if the four years of Joe Biden never happened. I guess we didn't have a huge influx of illegal aliens then, in violation of our laws? I guess Biden didn't cancel the Keystone XL pipeline even though contracts were signed? I guess Biden didn't let the border wall material rot in Texas even though Congress had approved the construction of the wall? I guess Biden didn't impose his tuition waiver for students even though Congress didn't authorize it and the Courts didn't order him to stop?
The hypocrisy is astonishing; they can twist the law as they please.
These people are becoming unhinged. And insurrection is in the air. Hopefully Trump will scare them straight as they face either losing their jobs or obeying their boss.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
01:31 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 454 words, total size 3 kb.
1
And, migod, if they HAVE to quote a Democrat, why did they pick Raskin, who is one of the worst? Oh, I see I've answered my own question.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at February 16, 2025 06:27 PM (rDOKo)
2
When Clinton did it everything was kosher. Trump does it and its a crisis. Got It!
Posted by: Mike at February 16, 2025 07:13 PM (QjxS4)
3
Your blog radiates authenticity and hope in every post. This one was beautifully written and truly inspiring provider smm panel
Posted by: SMM Panel at February 17, 2025 03:34 AM (ItL6O)
4
Timothy Birdnow
Yeah Dana; he's one of the worse (which is why they quote him.
Indeed Mike. Funny how that works, isn't it.
Yeah Dana; he's one of the worse (which is why they quote him.
Indeed Mike. Funny how that works, isn't it.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at February 18, 2025 08:31 AM (smPia)
5
Luxury escort services provide VIP membership programs that give clients exclusive access to premium companions, early booking advantages, enticing discounts, and private events tailored specifically to wealthy clients demanding unrivaled refinement and attentiveness.
Westend Escorts | Zakir Nagar Escorts Service | Escorts in Vadodara | Surat Escort | Escort in Ludhiana
Posted by: poojapathak at May 08, 2025 03:29 AM (aOYxD)
26kb generated in CPU 0.0876, elapsed 0.2946 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2821 seconds, 188 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.2821 seconds, 188 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
