February 22, 2025

Trump Admin Files Ethics Complaint against Obstructionist Jurist

Timothy Birdnow

Pam Bondi has filed an ethics complaint against the federal judge who stopped the Administration from imposing a ban on transsexuals in the military.

U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes now faces investigation and possible punishment up to removal from the bench for disrespecting a Justice Department lawyer and failing to uphold the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

According to the article:

"During two hearings in the case this week, she said "WTF" - a coarse expression of incredulity - questioned a lawyer about religion and used him as a prop in a "rhetorical exercise," the complaint said.

Reyes and a spokeswoman for the court did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The complaint was signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi's chief of staff, Chad Mizelle, and lodged with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

If a judge is found to have violated the code of conduct, they can face censure, reprimand or other discipline. Judicial misconduct complaints are typically reviewed first by an appellate court's chief judge then a council of judges."

These DEI appointments have never yet faced an environment where they are forced to follow the rules and judged by the quality of their work, and I am sure this judge is shocked and horrified that she was called out for something she always got away with in the past. So many of them think the rules only apply to conservative white males.

Playtime is now over for these faux jurists.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 01:16 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 260 words, total size 2 kb.

1 I sure hope it is!

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at February 23, 2025 11:37 PM (aTfFy)

2 Let's hope Dana. It's long past time to rein them in.

The President of El Salvador suggested impeachment. He says he faced the same problems and that's how he dealt with it. I think there is something to be said for that.

We need to set some sort of boundaries for the judiciary. There role was never actually outlined in the Constitution and they have usurped all sorts of powers not granted to them.

I caught Meet the Press yesterday and one of the panelists was outraged by Trump suggesting he could ignore judges "That is ABSOLUTELY not how our consitution works!" he boldly proclaimed. Were I there I would have asked him to cite the clause in the Constitution saying so. It's not there.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at February 24, 2025 09:21 AM (e2feM)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




23kb generated in CPU 0.2096, elapsed 0.5996 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.5931 seconds, 173 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
America First News
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Blaze News
Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Center for Immigration Studies
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
>Climatescepticsparty> Daily Caller News Foundation
Conservative Angle
Conservative Treehouse
Daren Jonescu
The Daily Fetched
Dana and Martha Music From the Heart Music
On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Just the Facts
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Lifezette
Let .the Truth be Told
Newsmax
>Numbers Watch
OANN
Real Climate Science
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Western Journalism
Science Daily
Science Tech Daily
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 93188
  • Files: 5601
  • Bytes: 1763.5M
  • CPU Time: 201:17
  • Queries: 3464501

Content

  • Posts: 30819
  • Comments: 137748

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0