January 26, 2022
The Wolf at Biden's Door
Jim Church
Asking people to do something and demanding "or else" are totally different things. When even leftists are denouncing mandates and such it is long past time to stand up and listen. PM Trudeau needs to get off his leftist high horse and start listening to the people.
Feminist Naomi Wolf Blasts ‘Nazification’ of Public Discourse Under ‘Cognitively Impaired’ Biden
Asking people to do something and demanding "or else" are totally different things. When even leftists are denouncing mandates and such it is long past time to stand up and listen. PM Trudeau needs to get off his leftist high horse and start listening to the people.
Feminist Naomi Wolf Blasts ‘Nazification’ of Public Discourse Under ‘Cognitively Impaired’ Biden
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:49 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'd say she's hit the nail squarely on the head. Good for her!
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at January 26, 2022 12:16 PM (A0QQk)
2
I utterly despise Naomi Wolf but she's right in this instance.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at January 27, 2022 09:00 AM (MPAp3)
3
"Even a broken clock..." Yes, I was surprised to see this level of lucidity from her. We just may be on the verge of some necessary change in this country!
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at January 27, 2022 11:06 PM (QlyGH)
4
I cannot tell you how many times I have been castigated for suggesting that the government should prosecute media companies for their denial of people's civil right to free speech. They prosecuted Derek Chauvin for denying George of some vague civil right, but applaud the media companies for denying access to free speech. Is free speech not a civil right? Should not the government protect that right?
Posted by: Bill H at January 28, 2022 12:26 AM (/sW5m)
5
I sure hope that is the case Dana!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at January 28, 2022 08:16 AM (6I0JO)
6
Bill, I agree with you; there is clear journalistic malpractice and when they lie about things they twist the whole country out of shape. But of course such a law would be used against US and not them. You know that's true.
We do need some sort of journalistic integrity enforcement. I don't know how to do it without abrogating our own speech.
We do need some sort of journalistic integrity enforcement. I don't know how to do it without abrogating our own speech.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at January 28, 2022 08:18 AM (6I0JO)
7
I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, though I watch a bunch of them. Just tell me, guys, how to create a constitutional law (especially one that would get through today's Congress) that yanks the media into line.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at January 29, 2022 12:24 AM (QlyGH)
8
Aye, there's the rub. I see no way to do it successfully.
We could tighten up slander and libel laws a tad; that would be a start. The media shouldn't have been able to create the Russian collusion story out of thin air, for instance. And they should have to cite sources. This "anonymous insider source" business is a way to simply make stuff up.
We could tighten up slander and libel laws a tad; that would be a start. The media shouldn't have been able to create the Russian collusion story out of thin air, for instance. And they should have to cite sources. This "anonymous insider source" business is a way to simply make stuff up.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at January 29, 2022 09:12 AM (JWkYd)
22kb generated in CPU 0.0094, elapsed 0.302 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2961 seconds, 166 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.2961 seconds, 166 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
