The Unhappy Women Wanderers

Timothy Birdnow

It sucks to be a liberal woman.

Just 12% are satisfied with their lives. But we all knew they were miserable, angry people. And lonely; the survey showed them three times as likely to be lonely as normal women.

Just look at Maureen Dowd; she's a miserable, lonely old hag and a proud liberal. She bought into the liberal stupidity long ago. I wrote about her woes years ago at the old Birdblog website.

So why are liberal women so unhappy? The article gives these reasons:

He's right but it goes farther than that. Basically these are spoiled girls who place themselves at the center of the universe. They are "self-actualized" and proud with no particular reason to be so. They believe they are at the center of multiple circles of virtue. They push men away because they don't have control of them, then complain there are no decent men around, and often they turn to women for comfort - women with the same emotional problems. Any men they get are going to be most unsatisfactory; beta males who submit to their will. They ultimately don't want that; no woman does. Whatever else they are they are first and foremost women, made by God and three million years of biology.

Science fiction writer William Tenn wrote a great story back during the golden age of s-f called Venus is a Man's World[/lin] in which an Earth ruled by women (there were few men as a result of wars and men became docile pets) produced too few real men and so women headed to the space colonies for husbands. The story - told by the little brother of a bitchy feminist type - involves her anger at a "man's man" type settler on Venus (this was when they thought perhaps Venus was habitable). Of course she secretly wanted him even while displaying open hostility, as he was not at all what she believed. She thought running her mouth was the way you fought, and was shocked at how he just DID things. No blather, just did them. In the end she married the guy (who was hard up enough to put up with her crap). The point of the story - and why I'm telling this - is that women may say they want to be strong and independent, but they don't know how to go about it in many instances (liberal women, that is) and it just makes them miserable. Men who share their values are held in contempt because they don't have the stones to stand up to them, and the men who do frgighten and disgust them. There is always another war to wage,another microaggression, another sleight to fume over. Feminism did this. Liberal women aren't happy because liberalism is essentially a doctrine of resentment.

And God made them women; they do not thrive by pretending they aren't.

It was true of Maureen Dowd and it's true of every feminist woman. In the end they are seduced by a lie, a lie that promises paradise but gives suffering and misery and emptiness. No matter how high these women rise in corporate America or how many men they dominate they will never be able to just relax and enjoy their lives.

Driven, ambitious men have a touch of this problem too, but for different reasons. In the end it's about wanting to compete with people, often for no good reason. Being satisfied with who God made you is the way to be happy; these people are not.

It's a sad fate.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:21 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 672 words, total size 4 kb.