March 06, 2021
Karl Lowith’s (1897-1973) "Nietzsche’s Philosophy of the Eternal Recurrence of the Same" was surprisingly published in Berlin in 1935 during the rise of National Socialism which increasingly glorified certain aspects of Nietzsche’s thought as the Third Reich wore on. Lowith was Jewish. Lowith was also a former student of Martin Heidegger (1889-1976), who was already a card-carrying Nazi at the time Lowith’s book was published. Heidegger spent much of his time during the Third Reich researching Nietzsche (1844-1900) to prepare the iconoclast’s controversial style of proverbial aphorisms for National Socialist consumption. Lowith was also sympathetic to Nietzsche, but for different reasons. While Heidegger failed to ‘bring into line’ Freiburg University into the orbit of National Socialist education in 1933-34, Lowith was forced to leave Germany in 1934 – first for Italy, secondly to Japan, and then off to America. He returned to Germany in the 1950's.
In 1941, Lowith became professor at Hartford Theological Seminary
thanks to much help coming from American existentialist theologians
Paul Tillich and Reinhold Niebuhr – both of whom were deeply influenced
by German theological existentialism.
Lowith received his doctorate under Heidegger’s tutelage in 1928 studying Nietzsche. They were close friends up until his master teacher took upon himself the Nazi banner in the early 1930’s which caused them to become estranged. Though Heidegger later became critical of National Socialism, he never repented of his loyalty to the regime that lasted throughout the entire history of the Third Reich. As such, Lowith increasingly took a critical view of Heidegger’s philosophy. Lowith even concluded in his Appendix of the book a critical appraisal of Heidegger’s interpretation of Nietzsche in which the most outstanding philosopher of the 20th century claimed that Nietzsche was not grounded in "Being†nearly enough.
Here, Lowith counters that grounding oneself too much in "Being†invariably leads to nihilism, which Nietzsche expressly wrote to overcome. Nietzsche famously warned his readers to read him slowly, deeply, and cautiously, which Lowith rebukes Heidegger for not doing. Lowith even labels Heidegger’s philosophy of being as an ‘essence’ of nihilism, which is the biggest insult one can use against a committed existentialist who routinely declares holy war against any and all forms of transcendence and/or abstractions. Lowith concludes, "Despite Nietzsche’s express statement that the total character of life and of the living world cannot be assessed or evaluated, Heidegger interprets Nietzsche’s philosophy as a ‘metaphysics of values’ and interprets values as a ‘point of view,’ the simple meaning of which he artfully misinterprets.â€
Yet,
Lowith acknowledges that in spite of Nietzsche’s commitment to
existential aphorisms which comprise much of his writings, the
iconoclast himself does contradictorily
At this juncture, Lowith begins by showing how the forced moral conformity of the Judeo-Christian
The process of Nietzsche’s secular redemption or recovery from the death of God, and then from nihilism to superman, can thus be easily characterized as an European eschatology of sorts which changes and progresses from "Thou Shalt†to "I will†to "I am.†Man thus needs to get away from the gods and God in order to overcome those divine interferences which prevent his proper growth. Yet, with divine transcendence now murdered, nihilism has taken over Europe in Nietzsche’s day, which is potentially dangerous and destructive. European nihilism is the "interim condition,†even an "advent†in between a religious past and a superman future, a present dispensation that is described as a fork in the road where there is now a choice to overcome or not. What comprises the interim condition of nihilism is romantic pessimism and scientific positivism that had completely permeated the 1800’s of Europe. This nihilism now needs to be overcome, "What must necessarily arise after the decline of the Christian interpretation of existence is the problem of the value of existence as such. For what is the purpose of being-there if no more purpose is available and will of existence is goalless.â€
Incredibly, Lowith further writes, "A superman will of the man of the future, a will that creates itself and the world as its own, takes the place of God, who creates Being out of nothing.†To state it more nakedly, "The will is actually the ‘principle’ of faith, because the man of faith does not will himself.†Yet, Europe is still in its present interim state, and needs to move on to the new will which has replaced the will of God murdered by Reason. Europe is thus at the crossroads and needs to move on to a willing of its own will so that the last metamorphisis can be accomplished in the future which Lowith describes as going "from the heroic principle of ‘I will’ into the godlike principle of ‘I am.’†Lowith then shows how Nietzsche’s will to power is directly related to the eternal recurrence of the same which is the final destiny of the superman, "Nietzsche characterizes himself as the teacher of eternal recurrence, and he knew this – his authentic – ‘teaching’ as his ‘destiny.â€
Nietzsche’s eschatology is thus a counter-eschato
For Nietzsche, the
man who wills himself as such, wills himself in such a way that he has
no regrets, and hence would do it all over again. As European man
overcomes his nihilism through the death of Christian eschatology, the
prophecy of eternal recurrence becomes a new resurrection of sorts,
rooted in the ancient Greco-Roman historical consciousness known as
"Eternal Return,†yet without the superstitious transcendence of its
gods. Fittingly, Nietzsche’s "philosophy does not, in principle, go
beyond this prophecy. The will to the superman and to the eternal
recurrence is Nietzsche’s ‘last will’ and his ‘last idea,’ in which the
whole of his experiment is systematically summarized.†The main point
of Nietzsche’s philosophy, it seems, is therefore to replace the
Judeo-Christian
Tim adds:
Outstanding Mark! This explains our modern concepts of identity politics and cancel culture perfectly; this self-willing into "being" means adopting tribal attitudes for those of like "being", and destroying those deemed unworthy by virtue of undesirable "being".
John Madric adds:
It seems to me that much of the ideals that arise, do so as a result of the circumstances in which people find themselves. It's cyclic. Much of it comes down to... "Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times. ― G. Michael Hopf,
Of course, from hard times, both Hitler and Washington arose, so it's more than that. Because there's no denying that both men were strong.
Tim responds:
John Madric Indeed; it comes down to what people believe and what choices they make about those beliefs. Washington was a titan because he chose to believe in individual liberty, in a transcendent God, in the sacredness of the human spirit and liberty. Hitler believed guys like Nietzche and Shopenhaur and pretty much rejected notions of individualism and liberty for a materialistic belief in the collective will (what Rousseau called the "social contract" which is quite different from the social compact of the eighteenth century philosophers who saw the individual as sovereign. Rousseau saw them as an indivisible part of the body that is society and subject to the whims of society, as opposed to having Natural Rights.) Hitler came out of the Rousseau wing, which was the same root as socialism, which is why National Socialism is indeed a Left Wing ideology and is in fact socialistic. That was a great comment John!
Chester McAteer adds:
Exactly! Nazi Germany, commonly referred to as Fascist was indeed a socialist state run by The National Socialtist Workers Party, it was in no way a not a capitalist one. der Nationalsoziali
It was, in fact, the NAZI government and not the nominal private ownership that exercised all the meaningful powers of ownership; it, not private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as the prices that would be charged and what every single wage would be paid. In effect, all workers and even owners of business were reduced to government pensioners. This identical to the Socialist model of government.
Now, let's see what the NAZIs themselves said about Socialism and how they identified themselves.
Hitler, surely he knew what he was talking about, don't you think:National Socialism is what Marxism (Communism) might have been if it could have broken its absurd and artificial ties with a democratic order.â€
"
Gregor Strasser, one of the founding fathers of the National Socialist German Workers Party said:
"We are Socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are determined to destroy this system under all conditions.â€
"In the course of history periods of capitalism and socialism alternate with one another; capitalism is the unnatural, socialism the natural economic system... The National Socialists and the Red Front have the same aspirations. The Jews falsified the Revolution in the form of Marxism and that failed to bring fulfilment.â€
--Heinrich Himmler
I could go on, but that should suffice however, you can find very similar quotes by the Fascists Mussolini and Franco.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:06 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 2331 words, total size 16 kb.
35 queries taking 0.2241 seconds, 185 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








