The Lies of Alexandria Crazy Eyes

Timothy Birdnow

Very filthy pot meet shiny kettle!

AOC Smears Charlie Kirk as ‘Ignorant and Uneducated’ During House Floor Speech

Yes, Crazy Eyes actually said that!

Here is every single lie she could think of rolled into one:

I dare her to prove just one of those assertions.

Charlie was, for instance, a big defender of Israel, and in fact the Fellowship of Christians and Jews was a sponsor of his television program on Salem. (Read more here.

The New York Times misattribued an anti-Semitic statement to Kirk, and retracted it. Apparently the ignorant AOC disregarded the retraction. Of course, since AOC is in New York (which Democrat Jesse Jackson referred to as "Hymietown") so she needs to drive a wedge between Kirk's supporters and the Jews who are increasingly moving to MAGA. But it's all lies - or she really is as ignorant as she accused Mr. Kirk of being.

Mr. Kirk was quoting a Jew Hater and the New York Times falsely attributed that to him.

And of course the rest of that is unsupportable pablum gleened no doubt from Democratic Underground rantings. Where did Mr. Kirk every oppose Civil Rights? He never did. He MAY hav e said at some point the Civil Rights Act led unwittingly to the breakup of the black family, which is a completely true statement. That is in no way a criticism of civil rights but of poorly thought out public policy. Many of us on the right supported the Free Trade movement too and while free trade is an unarguable good the execution of it was horribly destructive and was in dire need of reform. I guess AOC is happy with the breakdown of black families and the swelling of the public dole and rising illigitimacy rates in the black community then?

And, I ask AOC, is it better to leave people to stew in their own juices or is it the loving thing to do to look HONESTLY at a problem? AOC and the Democrats are entirely comfortable with a broken black community; they are a reliable vote for Democrats because their lives are beholden to the Democrat largesse. When a family does an alcohol intervention, for instance, is that an act of spite or love? I'm not saying blacks are all alcoholics or bad people, not by a long shot. But social conditions, most of which began after the 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed and in many ways fostered by attempts to implement that act, have led to the breakdown of key infrastructure in the black community - the family, schools, security, etc. SHE would call that hate, discussing such things. But who is the hater? Ther person who wants to keep these people trapped, that's who. SHE is the plantation master, not Mr. Kirk.

As for saying black women do not have brain power, this too was a distortion of what he said. He was talking about several black women (Michelle Obama, Joy Reid, Ketanja Brown Jackson) who actually came out and said they were affirmative action hires. He said that they were TELLING US :


Note he was saying that about three specific people, not all black women. And he was simply extending their own arguments to the logical conclusion. It may have been a case of reductio ad absurdum, but that is the worst one can say of what he said. AOC should know this.

As for his comments on Paul Pelosi, I suppose she's never heard irony and satire. This was in mockery of the Democrats who were bailing out BLM and Antifa rioters. He said:


And Kirk clarified  this by saying "I'm not qualifying the attack; I think it's awful!" But he asked why the attacker was being held without bond while a murderer in Chicago can just walk free that very day.

Calling for an "amazing patriot in the Bay Area to bail this guy out was what is called sarcasm. He was thinking back to Kamala Harris raising bail for people guilty of equally bad crimes.

To give Crazy Eyes the benefit of the doubt, let me explain how the left-wing blogosphere works. There are professional agitators, hired by Soros-funded non-profits or by the DNC, who troll conservative websites and news outlets. They cherry pick things they know will get their crazies all fired up, then post them in a limited number of outlets. As providing a link to the source being accused only increases their unique visitor counts, the leftists won't link up the original document they are trashing. Then, when it is out there, everyone else writes about it using the troll source. It works just like old-time media, with the news services or the New York Times being the only source anyone gets. So the same errors are repeated in articles.

For instance, I wrote a piece at American Thinker which was mischaracterized all over the web. The thing about it is it was misidentified as being from Townhall, and all sorts of leftists wrote all sorts of things about it with that same mistake. All of them said it was from Townhall. Nobody giving an opinion on the essay had any idea what was actually said there; they just took the word of the troll. So the lefotsphere is chock-full of distortions and misinformation and they don't really care that it isn't accurate. Context, of course, is just plain gone. That's how it is that so many liberals believe to this day that Donald Trump said there were "fine Nazis" at Charlotte. They were too lazy to look up the entire quote. It's why they also believe Trump promoted violence on J6.

That AOC blindly accepts all this proves she is one of those who "do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously.” Or worse, she does and is just a liar. Your pick.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 07:57 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 1220 words, total size 8 kb.