Yes, the woman who said we have no right to restrict illegal aliens because we "stole" the land has taken a man to court and gotten a restraining order for his trespassing in one of her homes.
So she is fine restricting access to HER property but isn't ok. with other people doing the very same thing.
That is hardly "stolen" land in Minnesota, I might add. There was nothing there until white people came and developed it.
John Locke's theory of property said that you cannot own land if it is in a state of nature, raw and undeveloped. It is only by improving land that you can claim ownership. That doesn't mean you have to build a city, but some changes, a fence, a well, even a shack, secures your right to ownership. The Indians didn't improve their lands - they just passed through most of them and laid claim with no other justification.
In English law (and thus American too) there is a concept called adverse possession. Commonly called "squatters rights" it says that if a person settles on unused property for a specified time (often seven years) with no complaint by the owner that person takes possession of said property (provided his residency was "open and notorious" so the owner would be aware someone was squatting.K).
So no, the land was not "stolen".
But if we accept her premise, was not the land on which her mansion is built stolen as well? If so, how dare she keep someone out. There is no right to own any land if "No one is illegal on stolen land.” All land was stolen from people who had been there before. Do we give Japan back to the Caucasian Ainu People? What about the Sioux, who claimed the Black Hills for their own when in fact they had only been there a hundred years, having kicked other tribes out (and those tribes acted as scouts for the military because they hated the Sioux for it.) And if this is the case, don't the Jews have first dibs on their land? I rather suspect Billie here is probably a big supporter of Hamas, yet Hamas was living on stolen land, stolen from the Jews.
At any rate this dim singer has shown her enormous hypocrisy.
1
Billie-Baby has not, to my knowledge, made any attempt to turn any of her "stolen" land over to any of the people it was presumably "stolen" from. If she did, she might find that it would be more difficult than she originally thought. That land may well have been occupied (though probably without legal deeds) by various "Native American" tribes, who would have warred over it to claim possession, going back perhaps to ancient Denisovan peoples.
I'll betcha that Billie's never heard of any of those peoples. Anybody want to take me up on that?
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at February 04, 2026 12:04 AM (/xiww)
2
There actually is an Indian tribe who had claim to the land before it was settled and they issued a statement, very polite but back-handed, thanking her for caring about Indian rights but basically telling her to get off their property. Of course she is making no effort to do so.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at February 04, 2026 09:18 AM (umJ+Y)