You know, the climate change creeps, the Gang Green as I like to call them, are forever telling us Big OIl is the ones funding "climate change denial" so they can kill Green Energy and keep making their filthy profits.

I always point out to them (rather fruitlessly since this is their biggest weapon against the science that disagrees with the IPCC) that Big Oil is the industry best positioned to take advantage of Green energy; they can build the solar farms and wind farms and other things using the money they made, and make and promote alternate fuels like ethanol or hydrogen. There is no reason for a suicide attack to kill Green Energy on their part. An in fact many oil companies are heavily invested in this tech, and also give money to the climate alarmists. But of course that goes into one ear and out the other.

So, why aren't these same people happy about the war between Iran and the U.S.? This should drive prices up and encourage people to buy EV's and go for alternative energy.

Strangely most of those who are attacking oil companies are against this war. Now why do you suppose that is?

Suddenly Democrats are all concerned with oil prices being too high and not at all concerned with Iran getting nuclear weapons. Democrats HATE oil. But here we now have them all worried about getting the price of oil down. Hypocrites.

And the oil companies are not happy about this war. https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/24/the-worst-ive-seen-oil-industry-grapples-with-the-fallout-from-trumps-war-with-iran-00841820 Why not? This should mean they are making huge profits. And it also should have led to a major uptick in American oil production, but the oil companies have taken a "wait and see" approach and not increased production by much, if any. If the reasoning of the Gang Green is correct they should love this war - they don't.

Which only goes to prove the alarmists are full of bologna. Big Oil is not funding the "denial industry" as they call it - they may have financed some research but the research is correct whether it was funded by Oil Companies or government or NGO's. Why is funding by Oil Companies clearly biased and incorrect while funding by NGO's and Government leads to accurate science?

And why would oil companies want to leave their children with a world destroyed by their product? Why would they want to have a nuclear Iran, for that matter, with their children to deal with that? They aren't happy about the war but they aren't marching in the streets to resist it either.

When it comes down to brass tacks a nuclear Iran is a clear and present danger and we do this for our children. "Climate Change" is a nebulous, unclear, and scientifically hard to support theory based on models that don't even predict current climate from past data. One must be dealt with, the other is just a fantasy, a generation long War of the Worlds scare.

Hide Comments | Add Comment