January 27, 2026

The Constitution Grants Trump the Power to Enforce the Law in Minnesota

Timothy Birdnow

Dana Mathewson forwards this from Powerline. Apparently Minnesota is arguing in court (in front of a Clinton-appointed judge) that the Tenth Amendment allows them to kick ICE and other Federal Agents out of their state because, like, Federalism and junk!

This is beyond ridiculous. The Tenth Amendment (which the left ignores all the time) is only valid where the Constitution does not specify a power it is expressly granting the federal government. Control of immigration and enforcing the law are both specified as a power of the United States. They don't have a legal leg to stand on (but that never stops the Left).

The Supremacy Clause says federal law trumps state law, and the 14th amendment, which is the basis of "birthright citizenship" says in section one that a person born or NATURALIZED in the United States is a citizen. It says nothing about illegal aliens. And section five of the amendment says the federal government can make laws to facilitate that amendment as needed and they trump state laws. That means immigration laws.

And the power to regulate immigration is vested in the U.S.

The federal government's authority to regulate immigration is primarily vested in the Constitution's Naturalization Clause (Article I, Section 8) and Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8). In fact the Democrats sued Arizona under Obama for passing a law identical to the Federal statutes and thus using state police to enforce these laws - and Obama won in court. The court agreed that immigration enforcement is a federal matter and the state can only offer assistance to the feds when requested.

This is a no-brainer; Minnesota has nary a legal leg to stand on here.

If Minnesota wins the Trump Administration should cut off ALL federal funds to the state. None of those funds are in the Constitution either. Fair is fair. Of course Walz and Ellison will sue in court to force Trump to keep the spigot flowing and will argue against the very argument they are making here. But when do we ever expect consistency from liberals?

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 08:33 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 358 words, total size 3 kb.




What colour is a green orange?




23kb generated in CPU 0.0628, elapsed 0.2373 seconds.
35 queries taking 0.2275 seconds, 182 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
America First News
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Blaze News
Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Center for Immigration Studies
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
>Climatescepticsparty> Daily Caller News Foundation
Conservative Angle
Conservative Treehouse
Daren Jonescu
The Daily Fetched
Dana and Martha Music Discern Report
From the Heart Music
On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Just the Facts
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
J.D. Rucker
Jo Nova
Lifezette
Let .the Truth be Told
Newsmax
Not the Bee
>Numbers Watch
OANN
Real Climate Science
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Western Journalism
Science Daily
Science Tech Daily
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 345977
  • Files: 19928
  • Bytes: 8.3G
  • CPU Time: 715:11
  • Queries: 11850516

Content

  • Posts: 32950
  • Comments: 134283

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0