June 11, 2023
The Climate War on Truth
I got this on Facebook from a gentleman named Will Steiner:
What we must remember. They're shutting us down, Joe. As the junk science of man caused CO2 climate change is being exposed with some real physics and data, the AGW world, instead of admitting mistakes, is doubling down on their AGW mantra.
1. They first attack very credible scientists like Drs. Richard Lindzen, Judith Curry, Roy Spencer, John Christy, Lowell Stott, et al. It has gotten so bad that Curry has had death threats made against her family and Christy's lab was shot up with people inside. Serious ecoterrorism.
2. They've actually cooked the data with one glaring example being that of the Vostok Ice Core Studies. Vostok was a 450,000 year study that showed climate change came before CO2 change, via a line graph of both climate change and CO2 change.. What did they do? They reversed climate change with CO2 change. And that reversal allegedly came from NOAA.
3. Their goal is now that of controlling the narrative.
.....And a glaring example of that is what James Hansen has done.
First. He wrote a paper on climate change and ocean currents, covering La Nina and El Nino. In that paper, he TOTALLY dismissed the earth's own geophysics as a climate determinant. And he did that without an iota of data to support his position. He totally ignored the laws of thermodynamics!
While the earth's own geophysics is certainly not to the level of solar radiation, it is still quite significant. Why is that true?
There resides at the inner mantle of the earth 3X more water than exists in all the surface bodies of water! And it is in a super heated state, and that heat and even the water does come to the surface. Go to Yellowstone or to any number of geothermal pools across the planet, or even a deep gold mine in S. Africa, as hot water is a very important observation and a battle to fight for miners. Take a swim near one of the hundreds of thousands of geothermal vents under our oceans to experience the efflux at a temp of 750 degrees Fahrenheit emitting that efflux 24/7/365 and not just when the sun shines.
.....That is also proven by the massive increase in degrees in "scientific journalism." Baffle with bullshit. An example of that is John Cook, himself. While claiming to be a climatologist, his degree is in scientific journalism. Cook was the one who came up with the popular 97% consensus. While consensus is NOT a part of good science, Cook went so far as to include people in his 97% who did not support the AGW narrative. Two examples of that are Drs. Tol and Idso. Interestingly enough, he did include, guess what, scientific journalists in that narrative. Surprise. Surprise.
I read many magazine articles and blogs on AGW. Very easy to dismantle but ignorant, uneducated, non critical thinkers, and gullible people believe them. I have discussed the math and even the quantum mechanics of the CO2 molecules ad nauseam. Sadly, the alarmist community is either too stupid, too uneducated or too vested in the mantra to really care. So many have relied on correlation to make scientific conclusions as a replacement for cause/effect. Sadly, many are too stupid to understand the difference.
Bottom line is, man caused climate change via CO2 emissions is the biggest piece of junk science since the days of the flat earthers. It has become increasingly more difficult to believe much of anything that comes from government bureaus and magazine articles. NOAA is at the top of the heap of junk science, and climate change is not their only infraction. It has gotten so bad that even once credible academic institutions have learned to skillfully obfuscate the truth for fear of losing research grants.
What we must remember. They're shutting us down, Joe. As the junk science of man caused CO2 climate change is being exposed with some real physics and data, the AGW world, instead of admitting mistakes, is doubling down on their AGW mantra.
1. They first attack very credible scientists like Drs. Richard Lindzen, Judith Curry, Roy Spencer, John Christy, Lowell Stott, et al. It has gotten so bad that Curry has had death threats made against her family and Christy's lab was shot up with people inside. Serious ecoterrorism.
2. They've actually cooked the data with one glaring example being that of the Vostok Ice Core Studies. Vostok was a 450,000 year study that showed climate change came before CO2 change, via a line graph of both climate change and CO2 change.. What did they do? They reversed climate change with CO2 change. And that reversal allegedly came from NOAA.
3. Their goal is now that of controlling the narrative.
.....And a glaring example of that is what James Hansen has done.
First. He wrote a paper on climate change and ocean currents, covering La Nina and El Nino. In that paper, he TOTALLY dismissed the earth's own geophysics as a climate determinant. And he did that without an iota of data to support his position. He totally ignored the laws of thermodynamics!
While the earth's own geophysics is certainly not to the level of solar radiation, it is still quite significant. Why is that true?
There resides at the inner mantle of the earth 3X more water than exists in all the surface bodies of water! And it is in a super heated state, and that heat and even the water does come to the surface. Go to Yellowstone or to any number of geothermal pools across the planet, or even a deep gold mine in S. Africa, as hot water is a very important observation and a battle to fight for miners. Take a swim near one of the hundreds of thousands of geothermal vents under our oceans to experience the efflux at a temp of 750 degrees Fahrenheit emitting that efflux 24/7/365 and not just when the sun shines.
.....That is also proven by the massive increase in degrees in "scientific journalism." Baffle with bullshit. An example of that is John Cook, himself. While claiming to be a climatologist, his degree is in scientific journalism. Cook was the one who came up with the popular 97% consensus. While consensus is NOT a part of good science, Cook went so far as to include people in his 97% who did not support the AGW narrative. Two examples of that are Drs. Tol and Idso. Interestingly enough, he did include, guess what, scientific journalists in that narrative. Surprise. Surprise.
I read many magazine articles and blogs on AGW. Very easy to dismantle but ignorant, uneducated, non critical thinkers, and gullible people believe them. I have discussed the math and even the quantum mechanics of the CO2 molecules ad nauseam. Sadly, the alarmist community is either too stupid, too uneducated or too vested in the mantra to really care. So many have relied on correlation to make scientific conclusions as a replacement for cause/effect. Sadly, many are too stupid to understand the difference.
Bottom line is, man caused climate change via CO2 emissions is the biggest piece of junk science since the days of the flat earthers. It has become increasingly more difficult to believe much of anything that comes from government bureaus and magazine articles. NOAA is at the top of the heap of junk science, and climate change is not their only infraction. It has gotten so bad that even once credible academic institutions have learned to skillfully obfuscate the truth for fear of losing research grants.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:18 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 654 words, total size 4 kb.
1
One green energy advocate responds to the fact that Earth's climate has contained this much heat before, and even much higher levels of heat, responds by saying, "Yes, but not in the human era." Good lord. Do these people even listen to what they are saying? If humans didn't cause it back then, why are we assuming that humans are causing it now?
Posted by: Bill H at June 12, 2023 10:41 AM (Q7br2)
2
Assuming, of course, that it is actually happening.
Posted by: Bill H at June 12, 2023 10:43 AM (Q7br2)
3
Frankly, Bill, I think the answer to them is "Duh!" Makes as much sense as anything they're saying, doesn't it?
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at June 12, 2023 11:21 PM (pdDZ2)
4
Yeah Bill; I always roll my eyes at that argument. Just because it's warming beyond what they think is acceptable does not make it unusual or our fault.
If even that were true. It was warmer in the Medieval Warming Period and likely other warming periods as well.
Dana's right; DUH! is as good an answer as they deserve.
If even that were true. It was warmer in the Medieval Warming Period and likely other warming periods as well.
Dana's right; DUH! is as good an answer as they deserve.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at June 13, 2023 08:41 AM (8jxea)
26kb generated in CPU 0.1006, elapsed 0.2974 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.283 seconds, 187 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.283 seconds, 187 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
