1 The Supreme Court’s justification for its ruling is stupid beyond belief. It is not quite the same as saying that one NFL team should have no grievance if another team plays outside the rules because, while NFL teams are all members of the same organization, they play in competition with each other, while our states do not compete.

Well our states do compete with each other, but that is an aberration based on greed, not a feature of the constitutional organization of our nation.

The Supreme Court’s point would be valid if it was in regard to local elections of local officials, but the objection which Texas filed was in regard to a national election for a federal official whose decisions and rulings would affect all states, including Texas. To say that another state cheating in that election was none of Texas’ business was fatuous beyond comprehension.

Texas would be completely justified in claiming that if they had no standing with respect to the election which put Biden into office, then they would not be subject to any rulings or decisions which he made after he was inaugurated.

2 That's a great analogy Bill; I'm going to shamelessly steal it from you when I argue this point.

One of the primary functions of the Federal government is the regulation of interstate commerce. This directly impacts that. As you say a local election may have no bearing, but C'mon Man! This clearly, unequivocally affects interstate commerce.

3 great site! glad i found this. any recent updates? bookkeeping services colorado springs co

4 love the idea! soo glad i found this site!