December 18, 2020

Socialism or "Transferism"?

Timothy Birdnow

Here is an interesting essay arguing that modern Americans are not so much into socialism as into "transferism". There is a distinction, one largely lost in the imprecision of modern jargon.

I would add socialism predated Marx by over half a century. What Marx created was "scientific socialism" by which he added the veneer of pseudo-science. In fact Marx's theory was primarily nineteenth century romanticism dressed in statistics. In the end state control of industry is the root of socialism, be it Marxism's direct control or Fascism's two-tiered system. In some ways it can be argued we live in a socialist state today, a fascistic one.

At any rate, this is an interesting essay, one worth reading.

Here is a little taste:

These four in ten Americans, and the politicians who speak for them most vocally, are not advocating socialism at all; they are advocating what we should really call "transferism.” Transferism is a system in which one group of people forces a second group to pay for things that the people believe they, or some third group, should have. Transferism isn’t about controlling the means of production. It is about the forced redistribution of what’s produced.

Federal transfers are money the federal government gives directly to people or to state and local governments. These are not purchases. To be a transfer, the money must be given in exchange for nothing. The earned income tax credit, income assistance, and payments from various welfare programs are transfers. So, too, are Social Security benefits. While workers tend to regard Social Security benefits as returns on their Social Security taxes, legally, Social Security taxes are simply part of the government’s tax revenues. Workers are not entitled to Social Security benefits. Who says so? The Supreme Court in Flemming v. Nestor (1960). In reality, Social Security benefits are simply transfers—gifts—from the federal government to retirees.

At least at the federal level, our government has fully embraced transferism.

Federal transfers to persons have risen from 11 percent of federal spending in 1953 to 53 percent today. As with persons, the federal government also sends transfers to state and local governments. Federal transfers to persons and state and local governments have risen from 17 percent of federal spending in 1953 to 69 percent today. As of today, almost 70 percent of what the federal government does involves simply taking money from one group of people and giving it to another. Less than one-third of the money Washington spends is spent in the name of actual governance.


Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:44 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 425 words, total size 3 kb.

1 For the most part I agree with what is said here, with the exception of Social Security being paid from federal revenue. It simply is not.

The Social Security Trust Fund is an entity separate from the federal treasury, and the revenue which feeds it consists entirely of contributions from workers in the form of Social Security contributions.

The federal government does borrow money from that trust fund, in the form of treasury bonds which are held by the Social Security Administration and which must be repaid upon demand.

Payments which retirees receive overand above the contributions which they make into the system are no different than the interest which they would earn on any retirement savings and/or the growth of funds which they would accrue in a retirement investment account.

As such, Social Security is not a transfer of wealth. It is a retirement investment no different than a savings account, and IRA, ar a money market account.

Posted by: Bill H at December 18, 2020 12:48 PM (vMiSr)

2 True to an extent Bill BUT the money isn't invested but rather is used by the Federal government to fund other programs and while it is supposed to be repaid it is generally full of IOU's from general revenue. If a retirement fund operated in the manner of social security it would be shut down for fraud.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at December 20, 2020 09:24 AM (0FCbZ)

3 awesome. learned alot. keep posting more dental implants san antonio

Posted by: alexpogi at January 16, 2021 01:58 AM (E9kpY)

4 love how detailed this article is, great job! lash extensions

Posted by: ida sanka at January 16, 2021 09:38 AM (DxQ6H)

5 thank you for this! really appreciate you doing this

Posted by: mold test at January 25, 2021 08:15 AM (CvgdE)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




26kb generated in CPU 0.0224, elapsed 0.2434 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2336 seconds, 193 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
America First News
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Blaze News
Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Center for Immigration Studies
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Citizens Free Press
>Climatescepticsparty> Daily Caller News Foundation
Conservative Angle
Conservative Treehouse
Daren Jonescu
The Daily Fetched
Dana and Martha Music Discern Report
From the Heart Music
On my Mind Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Just the Facts
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
J.D. Rucker
Jo Nova
Lifezette
Let .the Truth be Told
Newsmax
Not the Bee
No Tricks Zone
>Numbers Watch
OANN
Real Climate Science
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Western Journalism
Science Daily
Science Tech Daily
>Selwyn Duke
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at timbirdnow@aol.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 313145
  • Files: 21119
  • Bytes: 8.5G
  • CPU Time: 427:24
  • Queries: 10936994

Content

  • Posts: 33832
  • Comments: 135086

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0