August 13, 2019

Senate Dems deliver stunning warning to Supreme Court

Dana Mathewson

Dear Readers, if you need a graphic, blatant, bald-faced display of hubris, look no further than here!

Several high-profile Senate Democrats warned the Supreme Court in pointed terms this week that it could face a fundamental restructuring if justices do not take steps to "heal" the court in the near future.

The ominous and unusual warning was delivered as part of a brief filed Monday in a case related to a New York City gun law. Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, Richard Durbin, D-Ill., and Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., referenced rulings by the court's conservative majority in claiming it is suffering from some sort of affliction which must be remedied.

"The Supreme Court is not well. And the people know it," the brief said. "Perhaps the Court can heal itself before the public demands it be 'restructured in order to reduce the influence of politics.'"

The last part was quoting language from a Quinnipiac University poll, in which 51 percent favored such restructuring. In the same poll, 55 percent believed the Supreme Court was "motivated by politics" more than by the law.

Amazing! Absolutely amazing. Can it be that these bozos do not know about the separation of the three branches of our government? Often it does appear they are ignorant of the contents of the Constitution, but this truly defies belief.

Dramatic changes to the Supreme Court have been proposed by several Democrats vying for their party's 2020 presidential nomination, with "court-packing" being a common -- though highly controversial -- suggestion. Increasing the number of justices on the court would allow the president to shift the balance on the bench by loading up justices of his or her preference.

What could possibly go wrong?

Democratic candidates, including former Rep. Beto O’Rourke of Texas, and Sens. Cory Booker of New Jersey, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Kamala Harris of California, and Gillibrand, all have signaled an openness to expanding the number of judges on the court should they reach the White House.

South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg has also supported expanding the court, proposing a plan to have some justices appointed by the president and others selected by the other justices in order to "depoliticize" the court. He's admitted that the only way he can think of to make this work would be to increase the size of the court from nine justices to 15, while stressing that simply "adding more justices onto the court who agree with you" would be a bad idea.

Every time these clowns open their mouths, all the dumb runs out. And the hypocrisy is stunning. They talk about wanting to "reduce the influence of politics" on the Court, but what they really want is for the Court to act as another legislative body, under the control of the Democrats, of course.

What scares me is that if you can believe that Quinnipiac Poll, a large number of citizens like the idea. These are probably people who are totally ignorant of the Constitution, and a large part of our history, but still. . .

Go here https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-dems-deliver-stunning-warning-to-supreme-court-heal-or-face-restructuring  to read the rest, but I suggest you have some Aspirin, or something similar, at hand.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 01:09 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 542 words, total size 5 kb.

1 They should check out how well that plan went for FDR.

Posted by: Bill H at August 13, 2019 10:51 PM (vMiSr)

2 You got it, Bill!

It's a two edged sword. Leave it to the Donkeys to break the rules when they no longer serve them. I imagine they are enraged at the GOP ramroding SCOTUS Justices through, but they started it. These are the biggest bunch of babies and sore losers to be found.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at August 14, 2019 06:25 AM (mKc5Q)

3 This article is really fantastic and thanks for sharing the valuable post. swords and souls

Posted by: swords and souls at August 16, 2019 02:04 AM (z1oD4)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




26kb generated in CPU 0.0871, elapsed 0.2229 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2071 seconds, 188 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
America First News
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Blaze News
Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Center for Immigration Studies
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Citizens Free Press
>Climatescepticsparty> Daily Caller News Foundation
Conservative Angle
Conservative Treehouse
Daren Jonescu
The Daily Fetched
Dana and Martha Music Discern Report
From the Heart Music
On my Mind Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Just the Facts
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
J.D. Rucker
Jo Nova
Lifezette
Let .the Truth be Told
Newsmax
Not the Bee
>Numbers Watch
OANN
Real Climate Science
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Western Journalism
Science Daily
Science Tech Daily
>Selwyn Duke
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at timbirdnow@aol.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 229305
  • Files: 10697
  • Bytes: 5.2G
  • CPU Time: 441:01
  • Queries: 7586766

Content

  • Posts: 33167
  • Comments: 135363

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0