September 02, 2025
Robbing Climate Peter to Pay Climate Paul
Timothy Birdnow
So can I have my CFC's back?
Healing Ozone Layer Could Trigger 40% More Global Warming
This article claims the restoration of the ozone layer (which was never in any danger anyway; it's a cyclical thing) is driving planetary warming. If so, why not just let us bring back the cheap liquid refrigerants?
According to the article:
"Professor Bill Collins, who led the study, explained: "Countries are doing the right thing by continuing to ban chemicals called CFCs and HCFCs that damage the ozone layer above Earth. However, while this helps repair the protective ozone layer, we have found that this recovery in ozone will warm the planet more than we originally thought."
So, the planet will warm because the ozone is back. What does that tell us? It tells me the PLANET IS WARMING BATURALLY and the loss of ozone just kept that in check. In other words we accidetnally protected ourselves from thermogeddon.
The article continues:
The findings show that stopping CFC and HCFC production – done mainly to protect the ozone layer – provides less climate benefit than previously calculated. CFCs and HCFCs are greenhouse gases that warm the planet. Countries banned them to save the ozone layer, expecting this would also help fight climate change. But as the ozone layer heals, it creates more warming that cancels out most of the climate benefits from removing CFCs and HCFCs.
fin
See, we just don't know what the heck we're talking about where climate is concerned. This should be patently obvious and the conclusion we should drraw from this. Scientists confidently make these ridiculous predictions and yet have no real base of knowledge about any of this.
Oh, once again the alarmist scientists are telling us we have just three years to stop our whole civilization and control runaway greenhouse gases. How many times have we heard that from them now? They all told us it would all be over by 2000.
So can I have my CFC's back?
Healing Ozone Layer Could Trigger 40% More Global Warming
This article claims the restoration of the ozone layer (which was never in any danger anyway; it's a cyclical thing) is driving planetary warming. If so, why not just let us bring back the cheap liquid refrigerants?
According to the article:
"Professor Bill Collins, who led the study, explained: "Countries are doing the right thing by continuing to ban chemicals called CFCs and HCFCs that damage the ozone layer above Earth. However, while this helps repair the protective ozone layer, we have found that this recovery in ozone will warm the planet more than we originally thought."
So, the planet will warm because the ozone is back. What does that tell us? It tells me the PLANET IS WARMING BATURALLY and the loss of ozone just kept that in check. In other words we accidetnally protected ourselves from thermogeddon.
The article continues:
The findings show that stopping CFC and HCFC production – done mainly to protect the ozone layer – provides less climate benefit than previously calculated. CFCs and HCFCs are greenhouse gases that warm the planet. Countries banned them to save the ozone layer, expecting this would also help fight climate change. But as the ozone layer heals, it creates more warming that cancels out most of the climate benefits from removing CFCs and HCFCs.
fin
See, we just don't know what the heck we're talking about where climate is concerned. This should be patently obvious and the conclusion we should drraw from this. Scientists confidently make these ridiculous predictions and yet have no real base of knowledge about any of this.
Oh, once again the alarmist scientists are telling us we have just three years to stop our whole civilization and control runaway greenhouse gases. How many times have we heard that from them now? They all told us it would all be over by 2000.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:52 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 333 words, total size 2 kb.
1
So we're damned if we do and damned if we don't. My suggesting is OK, so we don't. Of course, the idiot liberals would look at this and say we DO, even if it ends up producing no tangible results, since that's the way liberals' "minds" work.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 02, 2025 10:07 PM (1g0jP)
2
Exactly Dana; they are all about "actttion" even when action causes worse problems. I am mindful of the children's song about the old woman who swallowed a fly and she keeps eating bigger and bigger stuff to get rid of the last thing she ate until she swallows a horse and dies.
Liberals believe they are gods in the end and every problem must be fixed by their wisdom and gigantic brains. They never trust Nature and Nature's God to handle it.
Liberals believe they are gods in the end and every problem must be fixed by their wisdom and gigantic brains. They never trust Nature and Nature's God to handle it.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at September 03, 2025 07:43 AM (an3PP)
3
AND they don't seem to notice that their "solutions" never seem to solve anything.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 03, 2025 11:03 PM (1g0jP)
24kb generated in CPU 0.1217, elapsed 0.2838 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2651 seconds, 191 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.2651 seconds, 191 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
