The Department’s investigation found that San Diego Med manipulated applicant data to achieve greater racial diversity in student admissions. San Diego Med’s documents show that admissions staff used purportedly "race-neutral” subjective criteria to deliberately increase admission of so-called "underrepresented minorities in medicine” (URM), which includes black and Hispanic applicants. In fact, San Diego Med used racial proxies, which, under SFFA, are banned by Title VI.

One example includes San Diego Med’s admissions staff using answers to "hardship” application questions — which allow applicants to address how they "overcame” certain disadvantages — to help determine which students were URM applicants. Thereafter, the admissions staff sorted applicants into six categories: Groups A-C — from highest to lowest MCAT scores and GPA, with "hardship” subgroups for each group. Each group and its subgroup were combined (e.g., "Group A” plus "Group A with hardship”), further sorted into "batches” of 30, and then rated for the interview stage. By giving reviewers access to the applicant’s race during this stage for certain admissions cycles post-SFFA, San Diego Med ensured that more URM applicants would be invited to interview. Thus, San Diego Med deliberately used the "hardship” categorization to skirt SFFA, by putting more URMs into the subgroups, which ensured that more URMs received interviews.

The result of San Diego Med’s manipulation: white and Asian applicants were denied admission in favor of lower-credentialed black and Hispanic applicants.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:35 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 321 words, total size 3 kb.