December 16, 2019

Political Correctness at Nature

Timothy Birdnow

The Woke Blokes at Nature, the supposedly premier science journal, have taken umbrage with the use of the words "supremacy" in regards to quantum computers because - get this! - it conjures images of white hooded klansmen seeking to lynch poor black sharecroppers!

Here is the letter by a number of scientists protesting the use of the word in an article:

We take issue with the use of ‘supremacy’ when referring to quantum computers that can out-calculate even the fastest supercomputers (F. Arute et al. Nature 574, 505–510; 2019). We consider it irresponsible to override the historical context of this descriptor, which risks sustaining divisions in race, gender and class. We call for the community to use ‘quantum advantage’ instead.

The community claims that quantum supremacy is a technical term with a specified meaning. However, any technical justification for this descriptor could get swamped as it enters the public arena after the intense media coverage of the past few months.

In our view, ‘supremacy’ has overtones of violence, neocolonialism and racism through its association with ‘white supremacy’. Inherently violent language has crept into other branches of science as well — in human and robotic spaceflight, for example, terms such as ‘conquest’, ‘colonization’ and ‘settlement’ evoke the terra nullius arguments of settler colonialism and must be contextualized against ongoing issues of neocolonialism.

Instead, quantum computing should be an open arena and an inspiration for a new generation of scientists.

Writing about this at Powerline John Hayward says:

It is not secret that the wokerati are making steady inroads into the domain of the hard sciences (physics, chemistry, engineering, etc). ButNature
magazine, although left of center, might have been thought immune from the sillier aspects of the PC culture.
I'm surprised John was unaware of how pc Nature has become, especially over Global Warming and the social sciences. Nature has increasingly moved into the lunatic fringe in recent years, promoting scare scenarios and rejecting good science by top guys. A number of years back, for instance, they flatly rejected a paper by Roy Spencer which contradicted Global Warming hystericism. Just said no. Spencer wound up having to publish in Remote Sensing as a result. Now, Roy Spencer is at the University of Alabama Huntsville and, along with John Christy, runs the satellite data center. He's no one to take lightly.

I guess Hayward was unaware of that.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:01 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 401 words, total size 3 kb.

1 It must be a real pain to be one of the "wokerati" (love the term). You must have to spend at least half of your waking hours (see what I did there?) checking to make sure nothing has gotten by you; otherwise you will no longer be "woke" enough and you will be denounced. Nothing, on any subject, in your area or elsewhere.


To an old geezer like yours truly, "woke" pretty much equates to "stupid." At least, the "scientists" in the above article certainly act stupid. If they're going to worry about this stuff, how do they have time to "do science" anymore?

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at December 16, 2019 10:15 AM (nYRaQ)

2 And it's reading so much into a word. Since when is "supremacy" a dirty word?  If we are going to do that, what about other words that might have some possibly offensive meaning in a given context Where does it end?

These people really need to work harder, or get a hobby.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at December 16, 2019 10:33 AM (hLjuC)

3 Agreed. To these people, every word is a "dog whistle." And speaking of dog whistles, humans supposedly can't hear dog whistles, so howizzit the wokerati seem to be able to? It certainly doesn't make them dogs, because they don't have the stellar character of most of the dogs I've ever known.

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at December 16, 2019 01:55 PM (CcPEk)

4 Is there such a thing as a parasite whistle?

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at December 16, 2019 03:28 PM (SCgs4)

5 I really couldn't say, but if there is, you're sure to find it on Amazon.com.

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at December 16, 2019 09:22 PM (HY6VT)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




26kb generated in CPU 0.0247, elapsed 0.2357 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2241 seconds, 193 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
America First News
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Blaze News
Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Center for Immigration Studies
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Citizens Free Press
>Climatescepticsparty> Daily Caller News Foundation
Conservative Angle
Conservative Treehouse
Daren Jonescu
The Daily Fetched
Dana and Martha Music Discern Report
From the Heart Music
On my Mind Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Just the Facts
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
J.D. Rucker
Jo Nova
Lifezette
Let .the Truth be Told
Newsmax
Not the Bee
No Tricks Zone
>Numbers Watch
OANN
Real Climate Science
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Western Journalism
Science Daily
Science Tech Daily
>Selwyn Duke
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at timbirdnow@aol.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 367704
  • Files: 26028
  • Bytes: 9.8G
  • CPU Time: 499:41
  • Queries: 12854425

Content

  • Posts: 33865
  • Comments: 135156

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0