September 04, 2025
Nobody Saw Nothin' with Epstein and Trump
Timothy Birdnow
Left wing Mediaite tries to make it appear Trump may have done something with Jeffrey Epstein, making much ado about an NBC News anchor asking if Epstein victims ever saw Trump do anything inappropriate:
That was in paragraph 1 of the article.
After a large amount of unnecessary exposition designed to make people think he did, the answer finally comes in paragraph Seven,which itself is an excerpt of the discussion and is no less than seven subparagraphs in length. The final subparagraphs finally answer the question:
So what was the point of the story? It appears to be rather purposeless and could have been concluded in just one or two paragraphs.
Well,the purpose is to tease the reader with the early portion in hopes the would ASSUME these folks saw something and stop reading. It was intended to leave a false impression. Or so the writer hoped.
This means there are no witnesses to anything regarding Trump. But of course we knew that must be true or the Democrats and the media would have been all over this long ago, when they held power. This whole issue now is just to maintain an air of suspicion and innuendo. It's the only card the Democrats and their media propagandists have to play.
BTW that last about Clinton may well be the point of the story; Clinton is well known for his love of young girls and was almost brought down by one such young lady he was despoiling. And he's been amazingly quiet about all this.
Left wing Mediaite tries to make it appear Trump may have done something with Jeffrey Epstein, making much ado about an NBC News anchor asking if Epstein victims ever saw Trump do anything inappropriate:
"NBC News anchor Hallie Jackson straight-up asked Jeffrey Epstein survivors if they ever saw President Donald Trump "do anything inappropriate” in relation to the deceased sex criminal.
That was in paragraph 1 of the article.
After a large amount of unnecessary exposition designed to make people think he did, the answer finally comes in paragraph Seven,which itself is an excerpt of the discussion and is no less than seven subparagraphs in length. The final subparagraphs finally answer the question:
"HALLIE JACKSON: I do have to ask, and I know, and it’s just something that I think we’re compelled to at this moment, with the attention on President Trump, with these questions, are at a pardon, did anybody see or hear of the President himself doing anything inappropriate, as it related to Jeffrey Epstein?
GROUP: No.
HALLIE JACKSON: Or former President Clinton?
GROUP: No.
GROUP: No.
HALLIE JACKSON: Or former President Clinton?
GROUP: No.
So what was the point of the story? It appears to be rather purposeless and could have been concluded in just one or two paragraphs.
Well,the purpose is to tease the reader with the early portion in hopes the would ASSUME these folks saw something and stop reading. It was intended to leave a false impression. Or so the writer hoped.
This means there are no witnesses to anything regarding Trump. But of course we knew that must be true or the Democrats and the media would have been all over this long ago, when they held power. This whole issue now is just to maintain an air of suspicion and innuendo. It's the only card the Democrats and their media propagandists have to play.
BTW that last about Clinton may well be the point of the story; Clinton is well known for his love of young girls and was almost brought down by one such young lady he was despoiling. And he's been amazingly quiet about all this.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:22 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 355 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Speaking of Clinton, back some time ago I saw it suggested in print that the reason he hung around Jeffrey Epstein was that he wanted to play around with Ghislaine. Which maybe he did. Which maybe I wouldn't blame him for, in that libertine gang. Ghislaine certainly is a babe, was even more of a babe then, and Hillary, as we all know, is not.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 05, 2025 12:20 AM (1g0jP)
2
You are probably correct Dana; few would pass a chance to get with Ghislaine.
Of course Epstein had other young babes and I'm sure Clinton would have deflowered them all had he the chance. I do not believe he didn't do anything, but at least he was cautious enough to avoid being caught - or the witnesses are afraid of being Vince Fosterized.
Of course Epstein had other young babes and I'm sure Clinton would have deflowered them all had he the chance. I do not believe he didn't do anything, but at least he was cautious enough to avoid being caught - or the witnesses are afraid of being Vince Fosterized.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at September 05, 2025 06:41 AM (XLGCq)
3
Can't help wondering what Hillary was spending her time doing while Bill was doing his thing on Epstein Island? She couldn't have been just swilling Franzia!
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 06, 2025 12:27 AM (FpsZq)
4
I was going to say she was swilling Franzia but you stole my thunder Dana. It does seem likely she was doing other things - like Vince Foster or Huma Abedin.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at September 06, 2025 07:21 AM (DKLJk)
25kb generated in CPU 0.0687, elapsed 0.239 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2278 seconds, 192 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.2278 seconds, 192 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
