Timothy Birdnow

I had an argument with a lame-brain the other day. The man presented a study purporting to show how trannie brains are similar to women's. He demanded I provide studies to rebut. I did not do so, primarily because it simply validated his insanity. But the fact is, a 2015 survey http://www.ustranssurvey.org/ found 11% of male to female sex changees actually tried to transition back to their original sex, and a far larger number had bitter regrets. How can that be if these people are "born that way", are "women trapped in men's bodies"? How do you regret enabling your true sex to come through? And why are so many sex changes male to female rather than female to male? And how many transgendered are lesbians? All of this suggests that there is not a "natural" transgendered so much as a psychological disorder. And brain differences don't tell us much (bear in mind neuroplasticity means you can change your brain by your behavior so it is not hardwired https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/hormones-and-the-brain/201608/gender-identity-is-in-the-brain-what-does-tell-us From this Psychology Today article: "So what has been found? A considerable number of gender differences in the brain have been described. Reassuringly, many of them lie in those parts of the brain that we know are concerned with sexuality (though also with other functions). For example, an area of the hypothalamus, part of the brain well known to be concerned with sexuality (but also with eating, drinking, aggression and other means of survival) is larger in males than females, and smaller in male-to-female transgender brains. What does this tell us? In fact, not very much, though it’s intriguing. First, because the same finding has been reported in gay men compared to straight ones (so is it concerned with sexual preference?) and secondly, the size of a brain area tells us very little about what it does. Why should a larger INAH3 (the relevant area of the hypothalamus) alter any aspect of sexuality? The brain is not a muscle: What matters is the way it functions (that is, its connections and electrochemical activity), not its size. There have been reports of chemical differences in male and female brains, but no one knows what these mean, or how (or whether) they relate to particular gender differences in brain function (and these are disputed). Scanning the brain has not helped much either. There are different types of brain scan; the simplest tells us the size of different areas. As we’ve seen, not very useful. Alterations in the brain’s blood flow in response to certain stimuli have been reported, but these often confirm what we already know – for example, that gay men respond differently to pictures of other men than do straight ones. Connections between brain areas may differ between the sexes, but we don’t know how to interpret them in a very meaningful way" end excerpt. So we see a few marginal differences but can't say for sure and don't know what they mean. Other research agrees. https://theconversation.com/brain-scientists-havent-been-able-to-find-major-differences-between-womens-and-mens-brains-despite-over-a-century-of-searching-143516 I would also like to point out that the Left has been arguing for a couple of generations now that women are the same as men, and there is really no differnce, yet now we are told there are differences in male and female brains and this is used to justify mutilating boys. If this is so then why do we keep treating boys and girls alike? Why is it not o.k. for boys to run around, play war, or cowboys and Indians and girls to sit quietly and play with dolls? Why are we treated to all these fight scenes in movies with 100 pound women beating up 260 pound men? Is there a difference or not?

In fact, transgenderism is no different than a man saying he's Napoleon; we would lock such an individual up so he does not hurt himself, but we perform permanent surgery on a child who says something even more ridiculous.We let him mutilate himself, and even encourage it.  There are other examples of this kind of mental disorder; infantilism, where a grown man says he's a baby, Body Integrity Dysphoria where you think you shouldn't have body parts like legs, etc. It's a mental illness. But we are treating it as perfectly normal.

Science Fiction writer Phillip K. Dick defined reality as that thing which, when you stop believing in it, won't go away. A boy may want to be a girl, but he's still a boy and deep down he knows it. That's why so many wind up regretting their choice to get their wedding tackle clipped. They were born with a Y chromosome, which makes them male, not to mention male genitalia.

This dope also tried to argue that having an extra chromosone (as in Down's Syndrome) somehow invalidates this argument. No; it just means you have a man with an extra chromosome disrupting his physical development. Or is a girl with Fragile X somehow not a girl since one of her x chromosomes is mutated with repetitions in the gene sequences?

Whether looked at from a scientific, sociological, religious, cultural, or epistemiological perspective there is no such thing as "fluid" genders or transgenderism. They call sex a "social construct" but in fact that is what transgenderism is; an artificial thing, a form of play acting. In other words, it's a denial of reality, which is by definition a form of mental disease.

But then most of liberalism is precisely that.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 01:47 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 913 words, total size 6 kb.