July 09, 2026

No Free Speech in Fort Worth

Timothy Birdnow

I suppose this woman never heard of the First Amendment. This preacher is exercising not one but two aspects of the amendment.


Wjat about the people who are offended by the ideas and behavior of the Pride event? So, are homosexuals more deserving of their rights than those who disagree?

The article cites an X post by Sarah Field:


"Street preachers Richard Penkoski and David Grisham were subjected to multiple violations of their First Amendment rights while attempting to preach on public property.

Upon arrival, they were immediately met by Fort Worth police officers who blocked their access to the public street and sidewalk, threatening both men with arrest for trespassing if they entered the area. When Grisham reminded officers that he had previously sued the City of Fort Worth in 2014 over this exact issue – a lawsuit that resulted in a settlement and an official apology from the city – the officer dismissed the prior case, stating, "I don’t care, you can file whatever lawsuit you want.”

After being forced outside the barricades, the confrontation escalated as multiple officers allegedly threatened to cite the men based on the subjective reactions of attendees. A female officer stated they would be cited if they said anything "offensive.” When Penkoski responded that offensive speech is protected under the Constitution and is not a crime, the officer claimed it fell under disorderly conduct, stating, "Well, yes, that is the conduct.”

Time to sue again - both the city and the cop who gave him all the grief.

Until there is real pain for pulling this kind of thing it will continue. The parties involved need to pay dearly for this and then they will stop. As the one preacher already sued the city and won it's obvious the lesson was not learned.

The X post continues:

Another officer further confirmed that citations would be based solely on whether others were offended. When Penkoski asked whether calling a biological male a "male” would result in a citation if someone took offense, the officer responded that if he continued doing so and someone found it offensive, he would be cited. Penkoski also pointed out that he was deeply offended by half-naked men walking around children at the event, but the officer dismissed the complaint, responding, "There’s really not much I can do about that.”

During the encounter, Penkoski pulled up and directly showed an officer established U.S. Supreme Court precedent confirming that the government cannot prohibit citizens from accessing traditional public forums such as streets and sidewalks simply because a private group holds a permit. Although the officer acknowledged the information by responding, "Huh,” he continued enforcing the restriction. (This video will be in the thread)

As officers repeatedly pushed the preachers farther away from the event, David Grisham was ultimately issued a citation for "unreasonable noise.” When asked to explain what constituted unreasonable noise under the circumstances, officers were unable to provide a clear definition, vaguely suggesting it could involve "sticking a megaphone in someone’s ear” – which Penkoski states did not occur, as the megaphone was held at waist level – or simply offending people.

In other words the cops were instructed to not tolerate any dissenting people at that protest and as a result they couldn't justify their actions based on law. They had orders from their superiors.

The Christian Post chimed in on this:

A Fort Worth PD spokesman on Monday provided The Christian Post with the following statement: "The Fort Worth Police Department is committed to protecting the constitutional rights of all individuals, including the right to free speech and peaceful assembly, while also ensuring public safety and enforcing applicable laws and ordinances.

The FWPD admitted these officers were wrong on how the Constitution works and ordered "refresher training" for officers. But as I mentioned above, it is pretty obvious the officers were acting under orders.

The preachers need to sue the daylights out of Fort Worth.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 08:38 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 697 words, total size 5 kb.




What colour is a green orange?




26kb generated in CPU 0.0568, elapsed 0.2426 seconds.
35 queries taking 0.2315 seconds, 184 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
America First News
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Blaze News
Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Center for Immigration Studies
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Citizens Free Press
>Climatescepticsparty> Daily Caller News Foundation
Conservative Angle
Conservative Treehouse
Daren Jonescu
The Daily Fetched
Dana and Martha Music Discern Report
From the Heart Music
On my Mind Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Just the Facts
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
J.D. Rucker
Jo Nova
Lifezette
Let .the Truth be Told
Newsmax
Not the Bee
>Numbers Watch
OANN
Real Climate Science
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Western Journalism
Science Daily
Science Tech Daily
>Selwyn Duke
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at timbirdnow@aol.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 400049
  • Files: 22012
  • Bytes: 9.3G
  • CPU Time: 967:21
  • Queries: 13324038

Content

  • Posts: 33252
  • Comments: 135610

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0