Timothy Birdnow

Easy; just stop reading cheesy scary disaster sci-fi...

AP Gives Advice on How to Manage Anxiety from "Emotional Toll" of Climate Panic

In Michael Crichton's novel State of Fear he postulates a societal control mechanism employed by the Ruling Class which uses fear to contain and manipulate the public. Crichton rightly understood that there was a machine in place designed to create new forms of fear to implement societal change. It started in the big universities, moved to the media who promoted it, and wound up as leglislation in Congress. But it was all bogus stuff, simple scare-mongering to frighten low information people.

In the case of climate change the goal is international socialism and world government and it is intended to force us all together to "fight climate disaster".

This was a theory that went back a while. While Roger Revelle is credited with actually formulating the theory that increaseed atmospheric carbon dioxide would raise planetary temperatures (Revelle argued it would stop at 2* F. and saw it as a curiosity, not a crisis) But it got it's big push at the Endangered Atmospheres Conference in 1975. This conference featured a bunch of big names in the climate change alarmism industry, guys like John Holdren (Obama's science czar), or William kellogg, or Stephen Schneider, or George Woodwell. Margaret Mead, the discredited anthropologist, chaired the meeting. The goal of the meeting was to push climate catastrophism as a result of the atmosphere because it is the one thing we all truly share on Earth. It was a prime tool to promote world government.

The plan was to promote Global Cooling as a result of aerosols put into the atmosphere. They began implementing this, but the climate wouldn't cooperate as the cooling trend of the sixties and seventies was crapping out. So they switched gears and went to their backup - global warming. Most of the people who promoted global cooling didn't skip a beat, switching to warming instantly, in a manner reminiscent of Orwell's 1984 "we have always been at war with East Asia". After a lengthy campaign in the liberal media the U.N. established the IPCC, which supposedly recruited the best minds in the (brand new) climate change community (Climate science was a branch of meteorology before being spun off and it was starving for funding - few to no meteorologists were involved with the IPCC). The report was a foregone conclusion, as I said at the time. There was a lot of money and pwoer at stake.

So the radicals have ridden this pony for decades now, a kind of forty five year long War of the World hoax. But it's never had much scientific credibility. At most they can point to specific points on Earth that are marginally warmer than the historical record, most of which go back to the satellite era and to 1979.

Nobody disputes the Earth is warmer, nor that Man might have something to do with it. Dr. Roy Spencer of the University of Alabama Huntsville and formerly NaSA rcsently calculated (using satellite data rather than corrupted land data) that land use changes account for all the warming we've seen. All of it. You can't pave over a forest and expect not to have it warmer there. Dr. Roger Pielke Sr. of U.C. Boulder argued this was the case for years, I might add. And as carbon dioxide has a logarithmic absorbtion of heat (meaning a doubling of it will lead to half as much energy retention) we have already pretty much reached the peak temperature increase.

Now the argument made by the Gang Green is that this will evaporate water from lakes and oceans and this will lead to more warming, leading to more evaporation, etc. in a runaway greenhouse effect. But we don't see that. You cannot square the idea of hotter and dryer with that. It should be hotter and wetter. Also, the Earth's albedo is declining, which is the exact opposite of what should happen; increased cloud cover from evaporation of water should make the albedo rise, not fall. Declining albedo also explains the modest warming seen, btw.

The fact is the Earth has largely negative feedback loops - the so-called climate sensitivity. Raise planetary temperatures and cloud cover reduces the amount of insolation (sunlight received) which cools it back down. We do not see positive feedback loops, by and large.

This is similar to Mars, which remains in a terrible ice age because every time the planet warms the atmosphere (which is largely frozen out as dry ice) increases in pressure, leading to huge dust storms which darken the skies and cool the planet back down. The atmosphere refreezes and Mars returns to her frozen tranquility.

Of course the media won't report any of this because they want to establish in everyone's minds the crisis which can only be solves by a massive reduction in industrial emissions - meaning we all must live poorer. And since this will starve the poor in the Third World it means we must establish relief funds and reorder society - The Great Reset. It means free enterprise must die in favor of fascist economics.

Well I suggest everyone simply decide not to participate in Ragnarok. The panic is all in our minds. But to get past it we must first realize the media lies to us night and day. Remember Covid. Remember Russian Collusion. Remember the Hunter Laptop story. If the media says good morning I have to stick my head outside to check.

Life is too short to live in fear. That is the way of children.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:01 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 940 words, total size 6 kb.