"Net Zero" - Growth

Stephen Heins:

Net Zero is a harmless looking phrase, which it isn’t. A synonym for "net zero” in 2050 is no growth, or degrowth.

How can increased unemployment, increased poverty, and decreased income per capital be good for the world’s population?

How can energy poverty be good for the 3.6 billion people who currently live without enough electricity to power a single refrigerator?

WRITTEN BY ANDREW MONTFORD ON APR 26, 2021. POSTED IN LATEST NEWS
Net Zero: A Disaster Waiting To Happen

You can almost smell the change in the air. A growing number of influential voices are beginning to ask the questions that everyone has been avoiding for the last few years.

A word from Tim:

"Sustainability" is akin to "net zero" which should be phrased "net zero growth". Both advocate no growth aka stagnation. A stagnant economy means a slide into poverty unless the population is dropping (and even then as there aren't enough people to keep the system running). The whole point of this is to phase out industrial civilization and to depopulate. They think they can reduce the surplus population by making everyone poor. (They fail to notice the poor in India do just fine repopulating.) The goal is to reduce the standard of living to a "sustainable" level meaning a level that people can't sustain THEMSELVES at. Then the population can be slowly reduced to about half a billion. That is the plan of the self-styled Brights.

In this world you must grow or you start to die. That is their hope.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 08:41 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 261 words, total size 2 kb.