Timothy Birdnow

A very disturbed woman is forcing her eight year old son to receive sex change treatments against his will. And a judge has refused the boy's father's request that she stop.

The Right Scoop has the story:

"Meet James, a healthy 6 year old American boy.
His mother decided her son James (whom she calls "Luna”) is actually a transgender girl, and the Texas court has sided with the mom.
If the mother wins JAMES WILL BE FORCED TO UNDERGO CHEMICAL CASTRATION AT EIGHT YEARS OLD " End excerpt.

This is child abuse on a monumental scale, including by a Texas court of law.

Here's more from Townhall:

"A Texas father is fighting in court for the right to see his son after being charged with child abuse by his ex-wife "for not affirming James as transgender.”

Court documents indicate that the 6-year-old boy only dresses and identifies as a girl when he’s with his mother, who enrolled him in his first-grade class as "Luna.” But James’ father claims that when the boy is with him he consistently wears boy’s clothing, "violently refuses to wear girl’s clothes at my home,” and identifies as a boy.

The father has reportedly been legally prohibited from talking to his son about gender and sexuality from both scientific and religious perspectives, and from seeking to dress his son in boys’ clothes. Instead, he is required to offer both girls’ and boys’ clothing, although he claims that his son consistently refuses to wear dresses. And according to a report by The Federalist, the mother "is also seeking to require him to pay for the child’s visits to a transgender-affirming therapist and transgender medical alterations, which may include hormonal sterilization starting at age eight.”

James was reportedly diagnosed with gender dysphoria by a gender transition therapist that was chosen by his mother, who is a pediatrician. The therapist’s notes reveal that James chose to identify as a girl when in therapy sessions alone with his mother, but as a boy when alone in sessions with his father."

End excerpt.

IF this child chooses to be a girl with the mother and a boy with the father, shouldn't the courts - and medical people - assume him a boy since he has male genitalia and a Y chromosome? It's clear the child is confused, or at best uncertain. In the event of uncertainty is it not rational to err on the side of caution here?

Frankly, the mother chose a fine name for her son; she is certainly loonie...

And the dad has eyewitnesses who testify that the boy does in fact identify as a boy and does not want to be made to behave like a girl.

This mother and the court are going to do something that will be impossible to undo, and this child will suffer for the rest of his (un)natural life. This is beyond disgraceful.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 12:05 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 491 words, total size 4 kb.