February 06, 2025
More on the Politico Scandal
Timothy Birdnow
More on USAID's funding of Politico.
Politico received $34.3 million dollars from diverse government agencies, much of it for subscriptions for government officials.
So we had the direct subsidizing of our so-called "free press" by the Deep State. Is it any wonder the country seemed to go mad?
Everybody who worked for Politico should be blackballed, completely untouchable. And everyone involved in giving this money to Politico should be prosecuted for violating the First Amendment.
BTW if Politico was getting all this money, one must wonder at who else? The New York Times, perhaps? Wapo? This needs to be heavily investigated and punishment needs to be doled out to anyone who was involved.
Oh wait; we already know.
Somehow I doubt Newsmax or Breitbart got any of those goodies...
More on USAID's funding of Politico.
Politico received $34.3 million dollars from diverse government agencies, much of it for subscriptions for government officials.
So we had the direct subsidizing of our so-called "free press" by the Deep State. Is it any wonder the country seemed to go mad?
Everybody who worked for Politico should be blackballed, completely untouchable. And everyone involved in giving this money to Politico should be prosecuted for violating the First Amendment.
BTW if Politico was getting all this money, one must wonder at who else? The New York Times, perhaps? Wapo? This needs to be heavily investigated and punishment needs to be doled out to anyone who was involved.
Oh wait; we already know.
Somehow I doubt Newsmax or Breitbart got any of those goodies...
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:26 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 136 words, total size 1 kb.
1
So why the discrepancy in money. CFP first reported 8 mil . Ace says 23 - 34 million. Not that it matters because a dollar is still a political donation. That this USAID has found its way into the pockets of Soros appt DAs comes as very little surprise.
Posted by: Mike at February 06, 2025 01:31 PM (bl/qr)
2
This USAID was a brilliant way to use taxpayer money to fund whatever subversive action the dems wanted. They would get money from USAID to house the homeless (A). A gets the money and hires (B) who is pushing trans rights and gives (B) the money it got from USAID minus salaries for show and employ people to do nothing. A goes back to USAID for more money because there are still homeless. Who can vote against homing the homeless. USAID gets more money from US. In the meantime B gets word that C needs money so it hires C and C takes the money and hires protestors and gives them flags to shut down an expressway making the taxpayer who is paying for this wait.All this without a watch dog in site.
Posted by: Mike at February 06, 2025 02:13 PM (bl/qr)
3
This was so insightful! Thanks for taking the time to explain.digital marketing company in gwalior
Posted by: Ninja at February 07, 2025 12:49 AM (xe0GW)
4
Your blog is a source of positivity and meaningful expression. This post was heartfelt, beautifully crafted, and deeply inspiring smm main provider
Posted by: SMM Panel at February 07, 2025 01:37 AM (Wh6+r)
5
This was so insightful! Thanks for taking the time to explain.villa for sale in gwalior
Posted by: suryakiranvillas at February 07, 2025 01:58 AM (xe0GW)
6
All excellent points Mike. I think the more we dig the more money that slid by behind the scenes we'll find.
You're description of the pipeline is wonderfully lucid; most people find it too complicated and will ignore it. (Not us at the Aviary, of course.)
You're description of the pipeline is wonderfully lucid; most people find it too complicated and will ignore it. (Not us at the Aviary, of course.)
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at February 07, 2025 07:37 AM (GP42d)
24kb generated in CPU 0.098, elapsed 0.6952 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.6869 seconds, 175 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.6869 seconds, 175 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
