January 18, 2023
Many More Stars Means Less Dark Matter
Timothy Birdnow
How does this impact the theory of Dark Matter? Dark Matter is predicated on nothing but balancing the books; there appeared to be more gravity in the Universe than matter, so they postulated a bunch of matter that is invisible to us. But this? Clearly it would suggest Dark Matter may be an unnecessary construct.
https://www.universetoday.com/30305/how-many-galaxies-in-the-universe/
At a hundred billion stars per galaxy that comes to a LOT of mass.
Dark Matter is believed to make up 27% of the matter in the Universe. But if it is reduced by a factor of ten then it's a lot less.
I would add that Dark Energy was a way to balance the books too and based on the amount of Dark Matter they theorized. So that would be profoundly effected too. Dark Energy was theorized to explain why the Universe is flying apart despite all the Dark Matter pulling it together.
Both were invented to explain the problems with theory, to balance the books. But do the books need balancing, or is it our pointy little noggins?
How does this impact the theory of Dark Matter? Dark Matter is predicated on nothing but balancing the books; there appeared to be more gravity in the Universe than matter, so they postulated a bunch of matter that is invisible to us. But this? Clearly it would suggest Dark Matter may be an unnecessary construct.
https://www.universetoday.com/30305/how-many-galaxies-in-the-universe/
" . . . a new paper published in the Astrophysics Journal revised the
estimate for the number of galaxies, by a factor of 10, from 200
billion to 2 trillion.”
At a hundred billion stars per galaxy that comes to a LOT of mass.
Dark Matter is believed to make up 27% of the matter in the Universe. But if it is reduced by a factor of ten then it's a lot less.
I would add that Dark Energy was a way to balance the books too and based on the amount of Dark Matter they theorized. So that would be profoundly effected too. Dark Energy was theorized to explain why the Universe is flying apart despite all the Dark Matter pulling it together.
Both were invented to explain the problems with theory, to balance the books. But do the books need balancing, or is it our pointy little noggins?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:07 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 216 words, total size 2 kb.
1
You're kind of late to the party, pal. I have been saying for a long time, at least ten years, that "dark Matter" is nonsense. That it is nothing more than a figment of our ignorance. That we made it up because our math doesn't work and we don't want to admit that we don't know everything there is to know. We invent something that cannot exist to account for something that we cannot explain, and then we believe that it does exist because it poses as an explanation for what we don't know.
Posted by: Bill H at January 18, 2023 10:10 AM (Q7br2)
2
I conflicted with a general kind of issue last time, I am at this point searching for some obvious plan.
Posted by: Flying Together at January 19, 2023 04:57 AM (RS1OA)
3
I know Bill, but this pretty much proves that Dark Matter is probably hogwash.
Science has become increasingly arrogant and refuses to just admit we don't know things.
Science has become increasingly arrogant and refuses to just admit we don't know things.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at January 19, 2023 07:12 AM (7Kf6Z)
4
At a hundred billion stars per galaxy that comes to a LOT of mass.
Posted by: Fake Tag Heuer at May 18, 2023 09:52 PM (MjvTm)
24kb generated in CPU 0.196, elapsed 0.3378 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.313 seconds, 187 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.313 seconds, 187 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
