May 23, 2025
Leftist Judge to Preside Over Trial
Timothy Birdnow
Meet the judge who is going to preside over the trial of Judge Hannah Dugan, the woman who interfered with ICE by schlepping an illegal criminal alien out her back door (no, that's not a ribald comment.)
Turns out the guy who drew the lucky straw is a radical leftist Trump-hating activist named Lynn Adelman.
Adelman was a Bill Clinton appointtee known for his radicalism. Jonathan Turley observed:
So we have one radical judging another radical. What could go wrong?
Meet the judge who is going to preside over the trial of Judge Hannah Dugan, the woman who interfered with ICE by schlepping an illegal criminal alien out her back door (no, that's not a ribald comment.)
Turns out the guy who drew the lucky straw is a radical leftist Trump-hating activist named Lynn Adelman.
Adelman was a Bill Clinton appointtee known for his radicalism. Jonathan Turley observed:
…Judge Adelman attacked Chief Justice Roberts as lying in his confirmation hearing and described Trump as "an autocrat” who is "disinclined to buck the wealthy individuals and corporations who control his party.”…
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) May 20, 2025
"He was previously reversed and rebuked in a voter ID case after largely ignoring controlling precedent. For many conservatives, they may see little difference between the two judges in the case in terms of their demeanor and detachment,” Turley continued.
"Judge Alderman’s public commentary is another example of how extrajudicial statements undermine the judiciary. This history should not be added to a controversial case and raise questions over the objectivity and neutrality of the court.”
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) May 20, 2025
"He was previously reversed and rebuked in a voter ID case after largely ignoring controlling precedent. For many conservatives, they may see little difference between the two judges in the case in terms of their demeanor and detachment,” Turley continued.
"Judge Alderman’s public commentary is another example of how extrajudicial statements undermine the judiciary. This history should not be added to a controversial case and raise questions over the objectivity and neutrality of the court.”
So we have one radical judging another radical. What could go wrong?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:37 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 202 words, total size 2 kb.
21kb generated in CPU 0.0061, elapsed 0.3543 seconds.
35 queries taking 0.3497 seconds, 170 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
35 queries taking 0.3497 seconds, 170 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
