September 22, 2025

Kimmel and the FCC

Timothy Birdnow

The FCC has strict rules of conduct for what can be said about disasters and crimes. Here are the pertinent restrictions:

1. The statement must be false.
2. The broadcaster must know it’s false or act with reckless disregard for the truth.
3. It must be reasonably foreseeable that broadcasting it will cause harm.
4. There must be actual harm or at least the potential for serious harm.

Jimmy Kimmel arguably violated these criteria. While no actual harm is directly attributable to his statements the social atmosphere is such that Kimmel had to know this had the potential to encourage other radicals to assassinate others.

These are the rules about false information.

Proof of intent is the hard part, but this isn't going to be adjudicated in a court of law - at least not at first. It will be an administrative issue. Yes, ABC could take it to a court, where the Trump Administration would likely lose. But then, ABC would then have opened the door for a closer scrutiny of their affairs.

And all that for a guy who ranks 53rd in the ABC lineup.

Kimmel clearly broke FCC rules according to The Federalist.

I suspect ABC isn't going to the mat for him. But of course he'll wind up on some cable network plying his hate and lies there.

Anyone remember Dan Rather? He got fired for something similar from CBS. Rather promoted the fake story about George W. Bush, claiming falsely Bush hadn't completed his National Guard service. When confrtonted he said "the documents may  be fake but I believe the story is true." CBS sacked Rather rather than face the FCC. You can't purposely lie to the public. Just because you are an alleged comedian (and therre is no proof Kimmel is one - he's a political pundit with a late night show who tells bad jokes) you cannot openly lie, especially about a tragedy such as an assassination. If instead he had made a joke he might have been under fire for poor taste, but he wasn't  joking.

Sacking Kimmel was right and proper and anyone who frames this as a First Amendment issue (ahem - Senator Paul!) doesn't understand the First Amendment.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 07:08 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 375 words, total size 2 kb.




What colour is a green orange?




23kb generated in CPU 0.0804, elapsed 0.1978 seconds.
35 queries taking 0.1897 seconds, 182 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
America First News
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Blaze News
Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Center for Immigration Studies
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
>Climatescepticsparty> Daily Caller News Foundation
Conservative Angle
Conservative Treehouse
Daren Jonescu
The Daily Fetched
Dana and Martha Music Discern Report
From the Heart Music
On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Just the Facts
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
J.D. Rucker
Jo Nova
Lifezette
Let .the Truth be Told
Newsmax
Not the Bee
>Numbers Watch
OANN
Real Climate Science
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Western Journalism
Science Daily
Science Tech Daily
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 368609
  • Files: 22685
  • Bytes: 9.0G
  • CPU Time: 781:33
  • Queries: 12623588

Content

  • Posts: 32981
  • Comments: 134377

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0