Judge Issues Injunction against HHS Vax Schedule
Timothy Birdnow
The Judiciary is completely out of control.
This is a case that had no business being heard at all; it falls well outside of the purview of the court system. This is a political matter and the authority to put out a vaccine schedule lies with the Executive branch. There should be no right at all for judicial review.
I suppose it's good we are finding out about all these activist judges; they have had to tip their hands during this administration. Otherwise they would have pretended to be judges rather than activists and then would have done far more damage because people would think them unbiased rather than partisan hacks.
Let me ask a simple question; if all Kennedy was doing was revising the schedule of RECOMMENDED vaccinations how is that a matter for the court? It's not like he's saying kids can't have the extra vaccinations if their parents want them, just that this is a list of vaccines that Health and Human Services recommends. So why did the American Academy of Pediatrics file suit in the first place? They could still recommend those vaccinations themselves and there is nothing Kennedy could do to prevent that.
It's because this outfit wants to COMPEL these vaccinations using the force of law, or at least the prestige of the CDC.
That is why this court should have dismissed this case when it was filed. If nothing else the American Academy of Pediatrics lacked standing; they cannot show that they were injured by this schedule change. They might disagree with the decision and are entirely free to say so, bt how were they actually injured by this? That is the very definition of lacking standing. Given how often courts deny Conservative cases for lack of standing (like vote fraud cases where voters are said to lack standing) you would think they would be cognizant of the double standard.
I would add the American Medical Association and the March of Dines and the Autism Foundation as well as other groups already said they were going to disregard the advisory from HHS and the CDC, so why was this case adjudicated at all?
This judge also has stopped Kennedy from appointing a number of people to an advisory board for vaccinations, so it is again a case of the judiciary legislating from the bench. This judge has no authority over who Kennedy appoints to an advisory board.
In addition this clown of a judge has overturned other recommendations by the Kennedy camp, such as not giving newborns hepatitis vaccinations.
Where was this creepy cracker judge when Joe Biden was implementing Covid vaccination mandates aka forcing people to take an untested drug which could permanently ruin their health or even kill them? This was entirely against the will of some people yet this judge didn't utter a peep. For that matter, Biden increased the vaccination schedule's for children too and we heard nothing about how he had no legal right to do it. But try to scale it back and suddenly it's Lexington and Concord time.
Oh, did I mention that the judge in question is U.S. District Judge Brian E. Murphy, a Biden appointee and a guy who has imposed his will on the Administration over the rule of law in times past? Murphy was recommended by Fauxcahontas herself - Elizabeth Warren - for this post. He was approved by the Senate in a straight party lie vote.
Murphy is a judge in Massachusetts yet he is issuing a nationwide injunction in violation of the U.S. Supreme Court.
This is the jackass who issued an injunction stopping the Trump administration from deporting illegal aliens to third party countries. He was slapped down by the Supreme Court in a rather harshly worded ruling.
Sadly there is no way to punish openly partisan jerks like this. We desperately need a mechanism to recall judges who overstep their authority.
I have little doubt the Administration will win on appeal eventually - though it will probably wind up at the Supreme Court.
What the Trump Administration should do is obey the ruling ONLY IN Massachusetts and publish separate guidelines for this judge's jurisdiction only until the appeal goes through. They should tell him to go to hell when he tries to cite them with contempt. SCOTUS was quite clear on these national injunctions.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:39 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 744 words, total size 5 kb.
25kb generated in CPU 0.0206, elapsed 0.276 seconds.
35 queries taking 0.2638 seconds, 182 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.