October 28, 2026
Judge Declares Acting U.S. Attorney Looking into Vote Fraud Disqualified
Timothy Birdnow
Channeling his inner de Moraes (the boy from Brazil) a federrale' judge told an acting U.S. attorney handindling illegal alien vote fraud that he was disqualified.
Actually the judge didn't bother to inform First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli he was disqualified, it was a journalist named Brittny Mejia, a shill for the L.A. Timess. Mr. Essayli was busy with a hearing over 20,000 illegal aliens on the vorer rolls while the judge apparently held a secret hearing to bar Mr. Essayli from his work.
You might say they legally assailed Essayli.
Brittny Mejia@brittny_mejiaAfter ballot hearing today, I informed @USAttyEssayli that a federal judge ruled this afternoon that he is unlawfully serving as a "de facto” United States Attorney.
Disqualifications in two cases delayed for now. Essayli told me the case "will be decided by the Supreme Court”7:52 PM · Oct 27, 2026·5,799Views
One has to wonder what standing the anonymous plaintiff had, if there even WAS a plaintiff. Certainly this is over the paygrade of said judge, who is at most a district court judge.
On what basis does a judge disqualify an acting U.S. Attorney? Acting means he does not need approval from Congress until his temporary term is up (usually ninety days) or the President removes him or another attorney is appointed and confirmed by Congress. The Courts have no say in such matters; that is encroaching on another branch of government.
As the Red State article points out, a similar case has already been appealed to SCOTUS after the Administration lost in the 9th Circus (as expected). It has this to say:
What's happening here has nothing to do with Essayli's qualifications as a U.S. Attorney and everything to do with politics. Before being appointed as Interim U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California in April 2025, Essayli was a member of the California Assembly for four years and was well known as a huge thorn in the side of the Democrat supermajority cabal in Sacramento — and for being equally antagonistic to wimpy Republicans in the capital. Essayli also served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Central District from October 2014 through February 2018 and was part of the prosecution team that responded to the terrorist attack in San Bernardino in December 2015. So, he's clearly qualified for the position.
So he was disqualified solely because he rocked the boat.
Actually the unnamed judge stayed the ruling until SCOTUS made a permanent decision.
But this should never have made it to court and the judge should have issued summary judgment to dismiss the case.
At any rate the judiciary is out of control, and so is the corporate media. Both need to be reined in.
There appears to be an international brotherhood of judges ready to usurp power any time they please. This has got to stop.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:16 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 500 words, total size 4 kb.
25kb generated in CPU 0.1047, elapsed 0.3203 seconds.
35 queries taking 0.3081 seconds, 188 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
35 queries taking 0.3081 seconds, 188 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
