February 16, 2025
In an unhinged rant recently New York's kommisar, er, Attorney General Letitia "I will get Trump" James raged against Elon Musk and DOGE:
"Elon was not voted in by the people. The American people deserve better. We will be in the courthouse time and time again. The American people will not back d
Elon Musk was as much voted into office as was any bureaucrat; he was hired by the President to audit the federal government. Trump was elected to cut spending.
I wonder if James holds the same standard where, say, Jack Smith is concerned; no American voted for Mr. Smith yet here he was hounding then-candidate Donald Trump for political purposes.
In fact none of the agencies Musk is investigating are run by elected officials; they are all Presidential appointees.
She knows this; she isn't stupid (well, not THAT stupid). This is an argument the Democrats are using to trick the low-information types. They know full well that most of our government is NOT elected but selected, and mostly by them, which is why they are so enraged by this move by Trump to ferret out the bad actors. The bureaucracy was part of a machine they built to give themselves eternal power.
The Federal bureaucracy consists of some 3 million people, but that's just the folks who are employees; there are many more independent contractors. (I couldn't find if that three million includes the 1.5 million non-military civilian employees of the armed services.) Were ANY of these people elected?
There are 542 elected offices in the Federal government, and all of them have unelected staff (who very often write the bills and speeches and whatnot.) So James is fine with all those unelected people running America as long as it's not a guy who is trying to make cuts.
But of course the average person won't think of that and many will buy the shibboleth. It's how the liberals have always succeeded in the past. Fortunately there is new media and for those who bother to look this information is there and it can be ascertained.
James is now under investigation for her efforts to subvert immigration law. She clearly has a laissez-faire view of the Rule of Law when it suits her.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:13 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 383 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Mike at February 16, 2025 08:57 PM (QjxS4)
Posted by: Bill H at February 17, 2025 12:30 AM (Q7br2)
Posted by: SMM Panel at February 17, 2025 03:53 AM (ItL6O)
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at February 17, 2025 04:21 PM (rDOKo)
Amen Mike!
perhaps so Bill, but I would say she's more dishonest than stupid. What is stupid are her goals. She's obviously smart enough to pass the bar (although she probably had help) and get elected and stay out of jail (where she belongs)but everything she says,does, and believes is stupid.
Agreed Dana!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at February 18, 2025 08:44 AM (smPia)
37 queries taking 0.2442 seconds, 188 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








