September 10, 2021
(I wrote this 7 years ago).
Lubos Motl the Czech string theory physicist who runs his Reference Frame blog, included some normal everyday CO2 concentration data that occurs in everybody’s natural, everyday surrounds like kitchens and etc.
150 ppm – the minimum concentration below which many plants may face problems to run photosynthesis and stop growing
180 ppm – the concentration during ice ages
280 ppm – the concentration during interglacials, i.e. also the pre-industrial concentration around 1750
391 ppm – the concentration today
500 ppm – the concentration around 2060-2070 (unlikely that before 2050 as they claim)
560 ppm – the concentration around 2080-2110 (the "doubled CO2″ relatively to the pre-industrial values) relevant for the calculations of climate sensitivity); a concentration routinely found outdoors today
700 ppm – the concentration in an average living room
900 ppm – concentration in an average kitchen
1,270 ppm – the concentration used to double the growth of Cowpea in a famous video
1,700 ppm – the average concentration in the Cretaceous 145-65 million years ago (early mammals came, plus figs, magnolias, birds, modern sharks)
4,500 ppm – the concentration 444-416 million years ago (the Silurian dominated by corals and mosses); see other values in geological epochs
10,000 ppm – sensitive people start to feel weaker
40,000 ppm – the concentration of CO2 in the air we breath out
50,000 ppm – toxic levels at which the animals like us get weaker in hours; the value is 5 percent of the volume
180,000 ppm – the concentration of CO2 in exhausts of a healthy motor; that’s 18 percent
1,000,000 ppm – pure CO2, just to make you sure what the units are
The warming induced by the increase from 391 ppm to 500 ppm is smaller (by about 20%) – because of the logarithmic law – than the warming by the same 109 ppm between 282 ppm and 391 ppm which was about 0.7 °C and pretty much unnoticeable without accurate gadgets and contrived statistical methods.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:55 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 348 words, total size 2 kb.
I'm wondering about that kitchen reading. We have a smaller-than-average kitchen, and when we're cooking it's my wife (chief cook), myself (sous chef) and our small dog waiting to scarf up anything that's dropped on the floor; so that's three sources of CO2. We have an electric range, so that would cut things down more than if we had a gas range.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 10, 2021 11:05 AM (GbRjY)
37 queries taking 0.2175 seconds, 189 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








