September 10, 2021

In Case You Think Atmospheric CO2 Levels Will Kill Us Or The Planet

James Doogue

(I wrote this 7 years ago).

Lubos Motl the Czech string theory physicist who runs his Reference Frame blog, included some normal everyday CO2 concentration data that occurs in everybody’s natural, everyday surrounds like kitchens and etc.

150 ppm – the minimum concentration below which many plants may face problems to run photosynthesis and stop growing

180 ppm – the concentration during ice ages

280 ppm – the concentration during interglacials, i.e. also the pre-industrial concentration around 1750

391 ppm – the concentration today

500 ppm – the concentration around 2060-2070 (unlikely that before 2050 as they claim)

560 ppm – the concentration around 2080-2110 (the "doubled CO2″ relatively to the pre-industrial values) relevant for the calculations of climate sensitivity); a concentration routinely found outdoors today

700 ppm – the concentration in an average living room

900 ppm – concentration in an average kitchen

1,270 ppm – the concentration used to double the growth of Cowpea in a famous video

1,700 ppm – the average concentration in the Cretaceous 145-65 million years ago (early mammals came, plus figs, magnolias, birds, modern sharks)

4,500 ppm – the concentration 444-416 million years ago (the Silurian dominated by corals and mosses); see other values in geological epochs

10,000 ppm – sensitive people start to feel weaker

40,000 ppm – the concentration of CO2 in the air we breath out

50,000 ppm – toxic levels at which the animals like us get weaker in hours; the value is 5 percent of the volume

180,000 ppm – the concentration of CO2 in exhausts of a healthy motor; that’s 18 percent

1,000,000 ppm – pure CO2, just to make you sure what the units are

The warming induced by the increase from 391 ppm to 500 ppm is smaller (by about 20%) – because of the logarithmic law – than the warming by the same 109 ppm between 282 ppm and 391 ppm which was about 0.7 °C and pretty much unnoticeable without accurate gadgets and contrived statistical methods.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 08:55 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 348 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Very interesting. Puts things into some perspective.

I'm wondering about that kitchen reading. We have a smaller-than-average kitchen, and when we're cooking it's my wife (chief cook), myself (sous chef) and our small dog waiting to scarf up anything that's dropped on the floor; so that's three sources of CO2. We have an electric range, so that would cut things down more than if we had a gas range.

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 10, 2021 11:05 AM (GbRjY)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




24kb generated in CPU 0.0284, elapsed 0.234 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2175 seconds, 189 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
America First News
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Blaze News
Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Center for Immigration Studies
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Citizens Free Press
>Climatescepticsparty> Daily Caller News Foundation
Conservative Angle
Conservative Treehouse
Daren Jonescu
The Daily Fetched
Dana and Martha Music Discern Report
From the Heart Music
On my Mind Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Just the Facts
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
J.D. Rucker
Jo Nova
Lifezette
Let .the Truth be Told
Newsmax
Not the Bee
No Tricks Zone
>Numbers Watch
OANN
Real Climate Science
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Western Journalism
Science Daily
Science Tech Daily
>Selwyn Duke
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at timbirdnow@aol.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 254673
  • Files: 16986
  • Bytes: 7.0G
  • CPU Time: 347:21
  • Queries: 8807556

Content

  • Posts: 33800
  • Comments: 134990

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0