In a discussion about how electronic voting machines produce a paper ballot, Willis Eschenbach observes:

Oh, yeah, forgot to mention Gillee said:

===
"Because once the paper ballots match the computer totals, the whole thing goes poof and then saps like you have to snap back to reality."
===

How many improper votes does Gillee's magical method miss?

The largest number are the "ajudicated" ballots. Unlike in past elections, there have been hundreds of thousands of them.

Then we have the votes with unverified signatures. Again, hundreds of thousands.

Next, we have the votes of dead people. Fewer of these.

And of course, the people who voted twice in different states.

Gotta take note of the votes from illegal addresses.

And the votes that should have been rejected for things like missing addresses.

In Nevada, Native Americans were offered gift cards to vote for Biden.

And there are plenty of reports of people going to nursing homes and "assisting" elderly voters.

Then there are the people who have moved out of the state, but still get and return an absentee ballot.

Of course, ballots that are marked as returned before they were sent out.

Finally, there are straight-out forged ballots.

And no matter how many times you count all of those various categories of improper ballots, guess what, Gillee?

No matter how many times you count them, the paper ballots WILL match the computer totals perfectly ... but no, the whole thing does NOT go "poof" as you claim.

Instead, what has just gone "poof" is your credibility in your claims about the election.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 11:01 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 271 words, total size 2 kb.