April 28, 2024
How Do You Know?
Selwyn Duke
When Supreme Court justice Ketanji Brown Jackson claimed she couldn’t define "woman” during her confirmation hearings in 2022, it created quite a stir. The story only would’ve been better if Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), who’d asked the then-judicial nominee to define the term, had followed up with, "Are you a woman, Judge Jackson?” The follow-up to that then should’ve been:
"How do you know?”
Do "Scientists” REALLY Claim There’s No "‘Simple’ Answer to Define ‘Woman’”?
thenewamerican.com
When Supreme Court justice Ketanji Brown Jackson claimed she couldn’t define "woman” during her confirmation hearings in 2022, it created quite a stir. The story only would’ve been better if Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), who’d asked the then-judicial nominee to define the term, had followed up with, "Are you a woman, Judge Jackson?” The follow-up to that then should’ve been:
"How do you know?”
Do "Scientists” REALLY Claim There’s No "‘Simple’ Answer to Define ‘Woman’”?
thenewamerican.com
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
01:08 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 82 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Linkee no workee, Tim.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at April 28, 2024 10:36 PM (551jX)
2
It should now Dana. Give it a try. (I can never get The New American to open on my machine so I'm counting on you.)
It didn't copy and paste properly. I think it's fixed.
It didn't copy and paste properly. I think it's fixed.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at April 29, 2024 08:01 AM (aTfji)
3
Works now. Previously it just returned us to the Aviary.
Good article. Reminds me of something I read years ago, which was about how a really wise man is defined as one who thinks of his smart rejoinders too late to use them. In this case I think we can assume that KBJ did not intend to give a good answer because she was locked in the throes of the agenda, and knew that if she DID give a good answer, she'd lose the job.
Good article. Reminds me of something I read years ago, which was about how a really wise man is defined as one who thinks of his smart rejoinders too late to use them. In this case I think we can assume that KBJ did not intend to give a good answer because she was locked in the throes of the agenda, and knew that if she DID give a good answer, she'd lose the job.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at April 29, 2024 11:06 PM (551jX)
4
I imagine so Dana. Yeah; she was in a tight spot. Deserved but it was tight.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at April 30, 2024 08:18 AM (BwaTe)
21kb generated in CPU 0.124, elapsed 0.6649 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.6564 seconds, 173 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.6564 seconds, 173 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
