January 26, 2025
Hegseth Accuser was "Promised"
Timothy Birdnow
Pete Hegseth's accuser has admitted to being recruited to sign an affidavit and said she was "promised her statement would corroborate others and affect key votes". It's clear she was recruited by Democrats to help take down Hegseth.
Who?
In what has become a classic pattern in the politics of personal destruction this woman - Hegseth's former sister-in-law - came forward at the last minute to accuse Hegseth of abusing his wife (who denied the allegations).
How many times have we seen this pattern in the past, these last minute accusations shepherded by Democrats? Remember Brett Kavanaugh? How about Clarence Thomas?
For that matter this is what they did to Missouri Governor Eric Greitens; recruited a woman who had admitted to a voluntary affair with Greitens to bring charges.
This is the politics of personal destruction. It's the nastiest, most vile form of political theater there is.
Who promised this woman? Who was she working with? The FBI should investigate.
Pete Hegseth's accuser has admitted to being recruited to sign an affidavit and said she was "promised her statement would corroborate others and affect key votes". It's clear she was recruited by Democrats to help take down Hegseth.
Who?
In what has become a classic pattern in the politics of personal destruction this woman - Hegseth's former sister-in-law - came forward at the last minute to accuse Hegseth of abusing his wife (who denied the allegations).
How many times have we seen this pattern in the past, these last minute accusations shepherded by Democrats? Remember Brett Kavanaugh? How about Clarence Thomas?
For that matter this is what they did to Missouri Governor Eric Greitens; recruited a woman who had admitted to a voluntary affair with Greitens to bring charges.
This is the politics of personal destruction. It's the nastiest, most vile form of political theater there is.
Who promised this woman? Who was she working with? The FBI should investigate.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:36 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 166 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And of course they'll listen to the sis-in-law and NOT the wife. (Spit)
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at January 27, 2025 12:32 AM (dmr2P)
2
Such an informative article! It really helped clarify a lot of things for me.Buy luxury villas in gwalior
Posted by: suryakiranvillas at January 27, 2025 12:38 AM (VF5h1)
3
But of course Dana. We all know women don't lie about these things (except when they benefit Trump in some way.)
That his own wife says it didn't happen is immaterial; all that matters is the accusation. It's not the substance of the evidence but the seriousness of the charge, as some Democrat once put it.
That his own wife says it didn't happen is immaterial; all that matters is the accusation. It's not the substance of the evidence but the seriousness of the charge, as some Democrat once put it.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at January 27, 2025 09:59 AM (OOzG4)
22kb generated in CPU 0.0503, elapsed 0.1872 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.1812 seconds, 174 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.1812 seconds, 174 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
