September 12, 2021

Geo-engineering

This from Richard Cronin

SCoPEx: Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment.

AKA "Solar Radiation Management”

Bill Gates is putting his money behind this Geoengineering lunacy. Of course, of course, the lunatics at Harvard will only say that they are still "studying” the concept and they promise "full transparency” as they go forward.

Yeah, about like Fauci was completely open and transparent as he dodged mandatory reviews of his funding to Wuhan. Yup. And Biden’s crash withdrawal from Afghanistan was well studied and implemented with full transparency.

Since we only have months to avoid "climate catastrophe”, do you think the lunatics running the show are going to hold back ?

"Chemtrails have nothing to do with the jet engine combustion process. They are often laid in a grid-like pattern by multiple planes (even drones) where they disperse slowly taking on the appearance of odd, at first narrow, but widening, smoky clouds until merging together to form, if sufficiently numerous, an aerosol bank that obscures the blue sky and gives the appearance of a dirty white overcast.”

Tim adds:

She swallowed the spider to catch the fly I don't know why she swallowed the fly I guess she'll die

I know an old lady who swallowed a bird How absurd to swallow a bird She swallowed the bird to catch the spider That wriggled and jiggled and tickled inside her She swallowed the spider to catch the fly I don't know why she swallowed the fly I guess she'll die

...there was an old lady who swallowed a horse - seh's dead of course!

Richard Cowley disagrees:

This will cost trillions and there are not enough aircraft to do such a thing, a fantasy.

Richard Cronin replies:

David Keith calculated that 400 flights per day with Boeing 747s would maintain the cover. They also don’t have to be at stratospheric elevations.

To what extent this is going on (or not going on), I don’t know, but you can be assured that if Bill Gates is involved the lunacy lurches forward.

Mr. Cowley retorts:

  I  dont care who calculated what, how would an airliner carry such a load with it hold already full ?

Richard Cronin replies:

Over the years i have spoken to airline pilot friends of mine and been invited to look in aircraft holds, 747, 757, 737 and a variety of others, the usual reply has been, "no chance, holds are always full with parcels and baggage, we couldnt carry all that weight anyway" looked in cockpits too, no such 'chemtrail controls were evident' also the mad lying chemmies have shared videos of test aircraft with tanks in containig water that were used to test bed load in new aeroplanes and then claimed it all as proof of chemtrails equipment.

Never once has anyone proved that any particular claim of a contrail as being a chemtrail by furnishing sample and test evidence from that claimed contrail.

Tim adds:

I can't say one way or the other, but I do disagree with your argument since you are assuming it has to be jet aircraft making these chemtrails. The article clearly states they can be done by balloon or even drone, which would make it possible. Not saying it's happening, just possible.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:24 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 539 words, total size 4 kb.

1 I read somewhere that chemtrails are (or might be) caused by various additives to jet fuel. If so, they're simply a by-product. However, if this is really the case, I'd think you could expect to see them all the time if you live close enough to a major airport. I live a few miles from MSP and have seen chemtrails very infrequently. 

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 13, 2021 10:52 AM (aTfFy)

2 That would be the logical conclusion Dana, but as you say you see no more near airports than anywhere else.

I reserve judgment on this. Richard Cowley is pretty adamant about it, and he IS an atmospheric scientist, but then I wouldn't put any such thing past the likes of Bill Gates and the other hubris-driven types like him.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at September 14, 2021 07:49 AM (qkVVs)

3 Frankly, the "additives to fuel" argument rings pretty hollow. That would just produce longer-lived contrails. Chemtrails have a definite geometric  pattern.

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 14, 2021 11:55 AM (dmr2P)

4 I would think so. As I say, I reserve judgment but tend to disagree with the chemtrail thing.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at September 15, 2021 07:26 AM (/hvMw)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




26kb generated in CPU 0.1374, elapsed 0.2044 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.1962 seconds, 188 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
America First News
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Blaze News
Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Center for Immigration Studies
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
>Climatescepticsparty> Daily Caller News Foundation
Conservative Angle
Conservative Treehouse
Daren Jonescu
The Daily Fetched
Dana and Martha Music Discern Report
From the Heart Music
On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Just the Facts
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
J.D. Rucker
Jo Nova
Lifezette
Let .the Truth be Told
Newsmax
Not the Bee
>Numbers Watch
OANN
Real Climate Science
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Western Journalism
Science Daily
Science Tech Daily
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 89805
  • Files: 7824
  • Bytes: 2.4G
  • CPU Time: 181:22
  • Queries: 2768821

Content

  • Posts: 33004
  • Comments: 134617

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0