June 22, 2025
The media keeps reporting that Tulsi Gabbard said Iran wasn't close to having atomic weapons, but they conveniently fail to notice this particular comment.
Tulsi Gabbard | ‘Iranian enriched Uranium stockpile is unprecedented for nation without nuclear weapons.’
There is absolutely no reason to enrich to 60% all of the nuclear material they have. The staggering infrastructure that has been running night and day for years now isn't built on a whim - especially when you consider Iran is lousy with oil and natural gas and has no need of nuclear power. That anyone would be foolish enough to believe that is beyond me.
If they have "unprecedented" quantities of enriched uranium they are not years or even months away from a bomb.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:47 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 131 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at June 24, 2025 11:31 PM (lBLsY)
I remember Condoleeza Rice being flabbergasted by the Russian invasion of Georgia (which happened at the end of her watch). I knew they were going to invade George - all you had to do was read Pravda. But she was probably immersed in these stuffed shirt, chardonnay swilling upper class twits of the year white papers instead of putting her nose to the ground.
Gabbard probably has the same problem.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at June 25, 2025 07:22 AM (6lr42)
37 queries taking 0.5797 seconds, 175 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.