August 18, 2025
From Russia with Love
Timothy Birdnow
How Robert Mueller sabotaged the Trump-Putin meeting in Helsinki back in 2018.
Mueller's indictment of Russian nationals (who were in Russia and thus would never testify in an American court) over the hack of the Democrat's server appears to have been designed to throw a monkey wrench in the Trump administration's diplomacy.
Remember; the FBI never examined those servers. The DNC hired CRowdstrike to do it and the FBI just accepted Crowdstrike's word on the matter.
What this did was make any agreement with Putin illigitimate and to tar Donald Trump for it. This was all a part of the "Trump colluded with Russia" hoax to bring his administration down.
From the article:
And it was in this climate that Mueller filed the indictments to make Trump - who had already expressed doubts about Russian involvement with the DNC servers -look like a for-hire underling of Putin.
One wonders if this was a hack at all, or rather a deliberate leak to be used to frame Russia and Trump.
When one of the heads of Crowdstrike testified about the hack he had to admit there was no evidence of anything going missing. A strange hack indeed.
The article continues:
No doubt the media was going to accuse Trump of carrying Putin's water at this summit. They can't now without reminding everyone of just how they lied to destroy Mr. Trump and his policies.
How Robert Mueller sabotaged the Trump-Putin meeting in Helsinki back in 2018.
Mueller's indictment of Russian nationals (who were in Russia and thus would never testify in an American court) over the hack of the Democrat's server appears to have been designed to throw a monkey wrench in the Trump administration's diplomacy.
Remember; the FBI never examined those servers. The DNC hired CRowdstrike to do it and the FBI just accepted Crowdstrike's word on the matter.
What this did was make any agreement with Putin illigitimate and to tar Donald Trump for it. This was all a part of the "Trump colluded with Russia" hoax to bring his administration down.
From the article:
The latest emails show Clapper responding to Rogers’s doubts about the DNC hack narrative by saying, "that’s OUR story and we’re stickin’ to it,” adding that "more time is not negotiable” and "we may have to compromise on our ‘normal’ modalities, since we must do this on such a compressed schedule. This is one project that has to be a team sport.” Clapper needed the false DNC hack narrative included in the Intelligence Community Assessment, an Obama-ordered report aimed at blaming Trump’s election victory on Putin. Clapper advanced this narrative despite the actual intelligence saying otherwise.
The fact that Clapper was pushing a false narrative to undermine Trump is further corroborated by an earlier DNI report from 2016, released by Gabbard last month, which stated that the FBI and NSA "lack sufficient technical details to correlate the information posted online to Russian state-sponsored actors,” meaning there was no way to determine whether Russia had actually hacked the DNC.
The fact that Clapper was pushing a false narrative to undermine Trump is further corroborated by an earlier DNI report from 2016, released by Gabbard last month, which stated that the FBI and NSA "lack sufficient technical details to correlate the information posted online to Russian state-sponsored actors,” meaning there was no way to determine whether Russia had actually hacked the DNC.
And it was in this climate that Mueller filed the indictments to make Trump - who had already expressed doubts about Russian involvement with the DNC servers -look like a for-hire underling of Putin.
One wonders if this was a hack at all, or rather a deliberate leak to be used to frame Russia and Trump.
When one of the heads of Crowdstrike testified about the hack he had to admit there was no evidence of anything going missing. A strange hack indeed.
The article continues:
Recent intelligence released by Sen. Chuck Grassley’s office shows that Russian intelligence services had intercepted emails of DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, as well as two Soros Foundation operatives, discussing Clinton’s plan to smear Trump with Russia collusion and, notably, CrowdStrike’s role in pushing that narrative into the media.
The new release by Gabbard is a vindication for Trump, who stood alone in 2018 pushing back against the false narrative while nearly everyone else, including his own team, was fueling it. It strengthens Trump’s position ahead of the upcoming summit.
The new release by Gabbard is a vindication for Trump, who stood alone in 2018 pushing back against the false narrative while nearly everyone else, including his own team, was fueling it. It strengthens Trump’s position ahead of the upcoming summit.
No doubt the media was going to accuse Trump of carrying Putin's water at this summit. They can't now without reminding everyone of just how they lied to destroy Mr. Trump and his policies.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:52 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 487 words, total size 3 kb.
23kb generated in CPU 0.0787, elapsed 0.2841 seconds.
35 queries taking 0.2787 seconds, 181 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
35 queries taking 0.2787 seconds, 181 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
