Timothy Birdnow

When the St. Louis Rams won the Superbowl in 2000, they had what was arguably the best offense in NFL history. They had multiple tools to draw on, great receivers, great running backs, great lineman, and a great quarterback. In fact, their defense was rather poor, under coordinator Lovie Smith, who employed "bend but don't break" which was essentially a prevent defense, the kind of defense you use when you are way ahead. It worked because the Rams were almost always way ahead; if they needed points they could easily obtain them. Mike Martz was then the offensive coordinator for "the greatest show on turf". (Martz would go on to become head coach and the team went into decline - he was a much better offensive coordinator than head coach.)

So what's my point? One of the Rams hidden weapons was backfiedl motion. They had their men all over the place, and opposing defenses couldn't figure out what was coming. This worked beautifully for the Rams and took them to the Superbowl twice. Sadly they dumped it by the second Superbowl and the New England Patriots actually stole their playbook and knew what was coming on every play. But that's another story.

The point is the whilwind motion was next to impossible to defend against - you couldn't plan for anything, just react. The offense held all the cards as a result.

That is precisely what Trump is doing now; his backfield is in constant motion and the defense can't figure out where to put their resources.

Sun Tzu, the ancient Chinese military philosopher, eloquated it succinctly:

'The whole secret lies in confusing the enemy, so that he cannot fathom our real intent.'

and

"In the midst of chaos, there is also opportunity.”

"Quickness is the essence of the war.”

I could go on but the point is made; speed and confusion of the enemy are cornerstones of victory.

And that is what Trump has always done and continues to do. Last time around it worked to a degree, but he had far too many forces aligned against him and was always on the defensive. Now is different; Mr. Trump is rolling like a juggernaut, Patton style, and he's about to take Berlin. Oh, and he has no Ike to slow him down.

What Trump is doing first and foremost is tearing back the veil of lies that have clouded the view of America so many years by going after the propaganda, the deep state power structure, and in so doing forced them to defend - a situation they have never been in in times gone by. They have never played defense and don't know how at this point. The news media - the cornerstone of their power - has been neutered by and large and now they are without the ability to control the flow of information.

So now Trump can throw the long passes to his receivers and they can't stop him; they are too busy chasing the decoys.

This situation won't last forever; eventually they will find a bulge and strike back, like the Germans did at the Ardennes. But the Germans ultimately failed.

More likely they will try to blunt what Trump is doing and ride this out; it's what they did with Reagan. They had pushed too far too fast and it cost them. Now they have to work on the culture, find new ways to brainwash children and usurp authority and damage the culture. They will do it too; the universities are chock-full of devious people whose sole reason for existing is to hatch up evil schemes to destroy Western Civilization. While we are making ground on the pokiitical front they will be working behind the scenes to hollow out the ground beneath our feet. This is what they did during the eighties; homosexuality became a big issue in the nineties because they had laid the groundwork then, and it gave us the eventual Supreme Court ruling that made homosexual marriage the law of the land. That started as a cultural push during the Reagan years when they were out of political power.

That's why we need to take action on the cultural fronts as well. What does it matter if we win on the political level, get laws passed that restore the old ways, if the young grow up to vote against us and favor socialism? This is the popular pendulum theory, that the pendulum swings back and forth with the next generation rejecting the beliefs of their parents. I have problems with the theory but it certainly has a point; every young generation wants to piss off their parents and they do it by adopting what was forbidden. This is where the Overton Window comes into play; what was outside of the bounds of polite thought becomes thinkiable, and what was the center is pushed beyond the window, to become taboo. The Left has always used this to promote their agenda.

Recently a black pastor shocked the Intelligentsia by saying we need more white babies to be born. Now this flies in the face of multiple shibboleths of the Left; the need for reducing population, the need to increase the percentage of "people of color" over whites, the need to change our viewpoint. But why should this be a shocking, taboo statement? Up until the seventies it would have been self-evident to most Americans that the whites should not wither away.

And tehre is reason for that; white people built this country (contrary to modern claims; except for Chinese labor on railroads few minorities actually built anything, but rather did the most basic grunt labor in agriculture. You didn't even see them in the mines or other such jobs much) and it is white people - especially white men - who still do the brunt of the work that keeps the country running.

Doubt that? Take a look at South Africa. Since 2011 South Africa has seen it's GDP decline by a whopping 23%. Why? Because they have been passing laws to punish white South Africans, who are leaving the country.

While the U.S. isn't South Africa it is increasingly less the American we knew, and with all the immigraition it has become far more Third World. In fact there are sixty million foreign born people in this country, according to the Center for Immigration Studies. That's comfortably larger than the population of Canada (45 MILLION) and over double the size of Australia (at 23 million). It's almost twice as many people as California (38 some-odd million). It is over three times as populous as New York State (19.5 million). And most of this immigration is coming from non-Western, non-white countries.

IF the left was honest they would admit the goal of DEI and immigration was to erase the white man from America. It certainly isn't about "cultural diversity" as they repress and attempt to destroy the once-dominant culture. White women are tolerable provided they hate white men and either go lesbian or breed with non-white men so their "Bad genes" are forever swallowed up into the genetic pool of "people of color".

BTW in 2023 it was estimated that the world's total white population was just 13%. So white people ARE the minority and multiculturalism would encourage more whites if that were truly what it was about. It isn't; it's about using law and trickery to erase white people.

If you want diversity then you must accept white males as you would any other group. THAT is something they refuse to do. And in fact my just saying this would lead to my cancellation and who knows what were I in a job with a major corporation or in government. I am fortunate in not having to worry about my speech offending some puritanical leftist speech code. As Schmee says in Larry Niven's Ringworld Engineers "I should watch my speech for this LEAF eater?!"

So when a black minister suggests we need more white people he is actually calling for multiculturalism and recognizing the contributions made by white men to our society and to our continued prosperity. But it is a taboo, having been locked out by the Overton Window and so this poor guy will take it on the chin.

I am a white man and white men are no better than anybody else, but by God we are no worse either. This demonic idea that whites are the root of all evil is beyond vile. In fact christianity found it's home among white people in Europe (which is a big part of why they hate it; they hate Christianity.)

My wife bought me the entire series of Evil the other day and I have been watching it every night. It's good, but was made in the '20's and it shows as DEI concepts are forever coming to the fore. In one part David (a black priest and the hero of the show) is both angered and disillusioned because so much of the art portrays Jesus and the Apostles and saints and even angels as whites. But what did he expect? Christianity withered in the east and in North Africa. It did so because of multiple heresies and constant exposure to oriental religioius ideas that corrupted the Christian faith. Islam took over quite easily where it did because first heretical ideas prospered in those areas; the heretics moved to Islam readily because they hated Orthodoxy. So, naturally, the ROMAN CATHOLIC Church inspired art that portrayed white people. Duh. (Of course he did not mention the Black Madonna of Montserrat.) And he also missed the point; God is light and Satan clings to the darkness. To portray that in artwork one must use light colors for God and dark colors for Satan. So naturally artists will paint saints and angels as white and demons as dark red or black. It has nothing to do with race but with artisitic expression. (Anyone who dwells in darkness appears black; try walking around some dark place and see if you can even tell a white man from a black one when there is poor visibility.)

And while Jesus was not Caucasian He was Caucasoid as are all Jews and Arabs and even Persians and Indians. He was undoubtedly no darker than Vivek Ramaswami, and probably no whiter.

(In 1775 Johanne Bluemenbach, a German scientist studied the craniological structure of different peoples and classified mankind into five types: 1) Caucasian, 2) Mongolian, 3) Ethiopian, 4) American, 5) Malayan. Modernity simply rejects these classifications because of interbreeding and sneers at any racial differences because this whole "we are all the same" thinking has become completely dominant in society even while we have the same people who push it pushing separation for "people of color". It been a tool all along.)

But of course this is ultimately a rejection of Christ and the culture built on Christian beliefs. This is their proxy attack.

White men are getting tagged with an antichrist version of the mark of Cain. And this is being done because the Christianity of the Western world thwarts their plans of a New World Order under an international government and their new morality which is more in line with the philosophy of the Marquis de Sade then traditional values. (Read Erik Kuhnelt Leddin for more on how de Sade is the founder of modern sexual morality at the link.)

So, as Jesse Jackson's people chanted "hey, hey, ho,ho, western culture's gotta go!" and that is why they support the Islamic world and Hamas over Israel, why they support the invasion of illegal aliens into America, why they support seizing land from white farmers in South Africa, why they support changing names. As the Book of Daniel states (7:25):

" And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time"

We have witnessed this in our lifetimes. Trump is reversing it, trying to restore the America we knew (which, I might add, is tHe who restrains" from 2Thessalonians 2-6; yes, it's the Holy Spirit but I believe America and Western Civilization was the tool used by God to restrain the coming of the Man of Sin.) And, as Jesus told the Apostles "they hate you because they first hated Me." That is no small part in why so many hate white men so very much. It is, in the final analysis, a war against our "white God".

Our preacher friend is completely correct in his call for more white folks.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 11:34 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 2129 words, total size 13 kb.