September 02, 2026

Farewell Charlie Brown

Timothy Birdnow

For decades women have told men they suck and blow and at the same time have refused to do likewise. They have used the male sex drive as a weapon of war to compel men to become their obedient little servants. They demanded to act like men, work like men, be treated like men, even while they often couldn't do those jobs or perform in that roll, but they didn't want to actually compete with men.

Yes, they got ahead, but mostly because corporations feared feminist boycotts but more importantly feared government coming down on them. So less qualified women climbed the ladder of success while the men got squat.

And "women of color" did the best of all.

At any rate, after years of hearing about "toxic masculinity" and being told to sit down and shut up men have done so - and are no longer pursuing women.

Now women are saying there are no good men out there. Wrong. There are plenty. They just aren't interested in YOU.

I recently had this argument with some gal on Facebook. She was imperious and snotty and then wondered why she can't find a man.

Anyway there is this from X:

Joseph
@Ainemba92293842
Men are no longer desperate for women.
And modern women are absolutely losing their minds over it.

For the first time in human history, the average man would rather be ALONE than be with the average modern woman.

And that single shift has collapsed an entire empire of female entitlement.
Men realized they were begging for crumbs of affection from women who bring nothing but chaos, bills, and body count to the table.

And now women are sitting in apartments at 28, 30, 32, with a cat, a wine glass, and a TikTok that says

Where have all the good men gone??
The men didn't go anywhere. They just stopped playing a rigged game where they have to be perfect and women get to be flawed and still be called a prize.
And that is what is driving women INSANE.
1:28 PM ยท Aug 30, 2026
699.1K
Views

Indeed. Women counted on the male sex drive to control them (and through history it has, by and large, and women have often exercised great power by being married to important men. Look at Messalina, the wife of Emperor Claudius. Look at Catherine the Great - she became Empress by marrying the Tsar's son, whom she basically just pushed aside for power.) But they've gone too far now.

Homosexuals loved this and promoted feminism to swell their ranks. No men meant more women turning their flag, and women acting like men may have, in the hopes of the male homosexuals, gotten men to decide to quit putting up with the b.s. and join the party. And there were people in the Ruling Class who wanted this to reduce the surplus population; I read an essay once by Isaac Asimov, the great S.F. writer, who argued for more tolerance of homosexuality to help reduce population growth. This was back in the sixties, I believe, before Ehrlich and his ridiculous thesis on population. So this idea has been percolating through the Intelligentsia for some time.

Feminism was always a weapon to destroy families and help usher in the New World Order.

A great many women fell for it. Why not? They thought it empowered them and it seemed to for a time. But now the inevitable rebellion has come. Men are just not that into chicks anymore.

Oh, they will hook up. But a relationship? Fuggitaboutit.

So now women are forced to be both mother and father to children, and work their tails off both in the home (which they sought to escape for the "fun" of the working world) and at a mind-numbing, back breaking job.

And they have little hope of landing a man now. They made a very poor bargain.

They didn't realize how good they had it. Women of, say, the Great Depression had to wash clothes by hand, cook food from raw ingredients, darn socks, sew up torn clothing, even make clothes, cobble shoes, etc. It was far harder then. No microwave dinners, no frozen foods, no washing machines or vacuum cleaners or any such. And they had it good next to the pioneer women.

Also, the pioneer women and Depression gals didn't want to work at the jobs men had then - working in the coal mines or being a gandydancer putting in the train rails was brutal work and the men who did it sure weren't there for the fun of it. It really was the fifties, with the change in the labor market emphasizing white collar jobs, that led women to think men were out enjoying their lives while they suffered. But even white collar jobs suck, by and large, and they are mind-numbing while involving office politics, a disgusting and stressful work environment. I hated working in an office.

So feminism was built on a lie from the get-go but women ate it up.

I might add that women have always coveted men's roles. Eve usurped Adam's role as head of the family with that stupid fruit she insisted they eat (and no doubt Adam feared she would cut him off if he didn't) and after that, when handing out the punishment, God said of Eve in Genesis 3:16:

"I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing;in pain you shall bring forth children.Your desire shall be for your husband,and he shall rule over you."

What does that last mean? Bible scholars say it was a prophecy, that all women would not so much sexually desire their husbands as desire their ROLE just as did Eve, but mostly they wouldn't get it because they weren't made that way. God never intended that for them.

God never intended men to be the subservient partner, even though that is easier and the lazy found it desirable. But for both sexes it is woefully unfulfilling. God made us male and female. It is not a spectrum, no matter what the idiots who promote this "multiple genders" idea say.

Anyway feminism has destroyed the female and they are just now realizing what a trap they have stepped into. Men realize it too, which is why they are no longer playing the game. The game is rigged and most men are not Charlie Brown.

BTW I lucked out and got a traditional, good woman. But I dated a lot of these types before finding her. 

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:25 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 1091 words, total size 7 kb.




What colour is a green orange?




28kb generated in CPU 0.0647, elapsed 0.2559 seconds.
35 queries taking 0.233 seconds, 186 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
America First News
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Blaze News
Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Center for Immigration Studies
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Citizens Free Press
>Climatescepticsparty> Daily Caller News Foundation
Conservative Angle
Conservative Treehouse
Daren Jonescu
The Daily Fetched
Dana and Martha Music Discern Report
From the Heart Music
On my Mind Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Just the Facts
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
J.D. Rucker
Jo Nova
Lifezette
Let .the Truth be Told
Newsmax
Not the Bee
>Numbers Watch
OANN
Real Climate Science
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Western Journalism
Science Daily
Science Tech Daily
>Selwyn Duke
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at timbirdnow@aol.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 299288
  • Files: 11789
  • Bytes: 6.5G
  • CPU Time: 677:39
  • Queries: 10804807

Content

  • Posts: 33534
  • Comments: 134493

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0