January 12, 2020
For all you good folks endlessly telling me that we need to depend on "peer-reviewed science" like that was some ironclad guarantee of accuracy, neutrality, and inerrancy ... not true in the slightest. Half the studies can't even be replicated.
Lancet Editor: Half of All Scientific Studies are False
2p from Tim:
It's funny; they demand peer review, but complain when any research is reviewed by scientists or others outside of the confines of the journals. Then it is somehow "fake science" or "big oil science" when all that is being done is the research is being critically examined. Somehow that invalidates the criticisms but we have to have absolute faith in the peer reviewers, many of whom are good friends of the researchers, as the Climategate e-mails prove.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at January 12, 2020 04:09 PM (DoG3/)
Posted by: James Smith at January 13, 2020 07:04 AM (ga+I5)
37 queries taking 0.2548 seconds, 108 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.