March 13, 2019

Exposing the Real Costs of “Green” Energy

Dana Mathewson

Power Line's John Hinderaker is part of, perhaps even founder of, the Center of the American Experiment, referred to here:

Today Center of the American Experiment released a groundbreaking paper that addresses a relatively mild "green” proposal: legislation that would raise the renewable energy standard in Minnesota from 25% to 50%. Two of my staffers have been working on the paper for months, drawing on publicly available (but rarely consulted) sources to understand what would be necessary to achieve that 50% goal, what it would cost, how it would impact the state’s economy, and what effect it would have on global temperatures.

The paper is titled "Doubling Down on Failure: How a 50 Percent by 2030 Renewable Energy Standard Would Cost Minnesota $80.2 Billion.” With appendices, it runs to 75 pages. I am not aware of a similarly comprehensive analysis that has been done of any "green” proposal at either the state or the federal level. The paper is fully transparent: all assumptions, data and calculations are clearly set forth. The appendices are largely spread sheets. If anyone disagrees with the report’s conclusions, it should be easy to identify where and why those disagreements arise. You can read the paper here.

These are some of the headline conclusions, from the executive summary:

* Building and maintaining "green” wind and solar facilities, along with transmission lines and necessary natural gas complementary plants (to provide electricity when the wind isn’t blowing, i.e. 60% of the time), would cost $80.2 billion through 2050. For a state like Minnesota, that number is out of the question.

* Every household in Minnesota would pay an average of $1,200 per year, in 2016 dollars, through higher electricity rates and otherwise.

* Electricity prices would rise by 40.2%.

* Electricity-intensive industries like mining, agriculture, manufacturing and health care would be hurt the most. Once again, urban greenies are hammering rural, and physically productive, America. [That last is my commentary, not found in the executive summary.]

* Higher electricity prices are a dead loss that will reduce spending in other areas as household budgets are squeezed. Therefore, according to economist John Phelan, using the generally accepted IMPLAN software, achieving the 50% renewable goal would cost Minnesota 21,000 permanent jobs, and reduce the state’s GDP by $3.1 billion annually. It is one small step on the road to Venezuela.

We should assume the situation is similar in every northern state, and that southern states have their own issues that would get in the way of success.

Note that you can access the entire paper from a link provided above. The entire article is on Power Line, here: https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/03/exposing-the-real-costs-of-green-energy.php

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:08 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 437 words, total size 4 kb.




What colour is a green orange?




16kb generated in CPU 0.02, elapsed 0.2281 seconds.
35 queries taking 0.2183 seconds, 98 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.