April 30, 2018

Ending secret science at EPA

Paul Driessen

In a long overdue action, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has proposed to end his agency’s decades-long practice of using secretive, questionable, even deceptive or fraudulent science to support policy and regulatory initiatives. His changes will help ensure that any science underlying agency actions is transparent and publicly available, so that independent experts can examine it and determine whether it passes basic tests for sound, accurate, honest science.

Predictably, various politicians, environmental activists, government-funded scientists and journalists have railed against the proposal. My article presents examples of past EPA junk science, discusses why the critics are misinformed and underscores why these reforms should be implemented immediately.

Ending secret science at EPA

Administrator Pruitt initiates overdue changes to bring transparency, integrity to rulemaking

Paul Driessen

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt hasproposed to endthe longstanding EPA practice of using secretive, often questionable, even deceptive science to support agency policy and regulatory initiatives. His proposed rules will ensure that any science underlying agency actions is transparent and publicly available for independent experts to examine and validate – or point out its flaws.

It also responds to growing concerns that extensive scientific research in environmental, medical and other arenascannot be replicated by other scientists, or is compromised by cherry-picked data, poor research design, sloppy analysis or biased researchers. The situation has led to calls for increased sharing of data and methodologies, more independent peer review and other actions to weed out problems. There is no excuse for hiding data when studies are funded by taxpayers or used to justify regulations.

The situation has been especially acute at EPA. As Mr. Pruitt observed, "The ability to test, authenticate and reproduce scientific findings is vital for the integrity of the rule making process. Americans deserve to assess the legitimacy of the science underpinning EPA decisions that may impact their lives.”

That is particularly true for regulations that exact millions or billions in compliance costs, affect thousands of jobs, target industries and coal-fired electricity generators that regulators want to close down, or seek to replace all fossil fuel use with "renewable” energy. With the cumulative economic impact of federal regulations reachingnearly $2 trillion per year, research reform is absolutely essential.

We need regulation and pollution control – but it must be based on solid, replicable, honest science.

Congressman Lamar Smith(R-TX) has held hearings and championed multiple bills to address the problem. Several have been passed by the House of Representatives, only to languish in the Senate. With courts offering little or no help, Executive Branch action may be the only remaining solution.

Deceptive, faulty science on fine particulate pollution(PM2.5) was the bedrock of the Obama EPA’s war on coal. Particulates don’t just make you sick; they are directly related "to dying sooner than you should,” EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson falsely told Congress. There is no level "at which premature mortality effects do not occur,” Mr. Obama’s next Administrator Gina McCarthy dishonestly testified.

At the same time they made these claims, they were presiding overillegal experiments on humans– including people with asthma, diabetes and heart disease – who were subjected to eight, 30 or even 60 times more particulates per volume, for up to two hours, than what EPA claimed are dangerous or lethal. None of them got sick, proving that EPA’s claims were false. The agency refused to correct its claims.

EPA took a similar stance on mercury – asserting that power plant emissions were causing dangerously high mercury levels in American children and pregnant women. In reality, US power plants account for just0.5% of all the mercuryin the air Americans breathe, and blood mercury counts for US women and children are well below even EPA’s excessively safe levels, according to the Centers for Disease Control.

How did EPA’s junk science, illegal experiments and heavy-handed regulations pass muster? For one thing, politics too often dictated the science. In addition, the agency paidmore than $180 millionover a 16-year period to institutions represented by members of its Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC), which often rubberstamped studies and conclusions that failed integrity and transparency tests.

On global warming, EPA issued an Endangerment Finding, which claimed emissions of (plant-fertilizing) carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuelsthreatened the health and welfare of American citizens.

It reached this conclusion by looking only at studies and computer models from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, while ignoringvolumes of studies by independent scientists who found no such threat. EPA officials even told one of the agency’s own senior experts that his studies would not be shared with agency staff and he was to cease any further work on climate change, because his analyses "do not help the legal or policy case for this decision” that fossil fuel CO2 emissions endanger Americans.

EPA was also a principal force behind the "social cost of carbon” scheme that supposedly calculated how much CO2-driven climate change would cost the United States and how those costs would be reduced by slashing fossil fuel use. The alleged cost of damages began at an arbitrary $22 per ton of carbon dioxide released in 2010, then climbed to an equally random $30 per ton in 2013 and $40 per ton in 2016.

Incredibly, EPA modelers also claimed they can accurately forecast global temperatures, climate and weather, technological advances, economic development, living standards – and damages to global civilizations and ecosystems from US carbon dioxide emissions – for the next 300 years! Moreover, in the real world, the benefits of using carbon-based fuels and improving crop, forest and grassland growth via higher atmospheric CO2 levels outweigh hypothesized costs by at least 50-to-1 to as much as 500-to-1.

Deceptive, politicized, policy-driven "science”like this pervaded EPA regulatory actions for too many years. Reaction to Mr. Pruitt’s corrective actions show how poorly informed his critics can be.

* The changes will force researchers to reveal personal or confidential information about participants in health studies. No they won’t. Such information is not needed and can easily be redacted.

* EPA can keep us safe from harmful chemicals only if it takes full advantage of all available scientific research. Public health and safety depend on ensuring that research and data purportedly supporting it are made public and carefully reviewed by multiple experts, to ensure accuracy and integrity. EPA will take full advantage of all available research that passes these tests. Tax-funded studies should all be public!

* The rules will exclude studies that rely on outside funding sources which limit access to underlying data. Those studies should be excluded. The funders need to revise their policies to ensure integrity.

* The rules will exclude so much research that they will endanger public health. Not so. The only studies EPA will likely not see is what researchers know will not pass muster, and thus do not submit. The real danger comes from research that is based on shoddy data, algorithms, models and analyses that past researchers have been able to keep secret. That is precisely what the rules will ferret out and correct.

* Pruitt has removed scientists who receive EPA funding from participating in advisory committees. As noted above, those scientists had received millions of dollars in exchange for supporting EPA analyses, initiatives and regulations. Pruitt wants input from experts whose views can be trusted.

* Pruitt has criticized the peer review process. Too many peer reviews have been conducted by closed circles of associated scientists who rely on government grants and support regulatory decisions to maintain funding. Somerefused to share data with experts who might critique their work – or worked tokeep contrarian research outof scientific journals. The fact that some journals rarely require access to or review of underlying data further demonstrates why the peer review process also needs to be reformed.

Too many past EPA policies, policy-driven research and regulations have been employed to force the nation to abandon fossil fuels that still supply 80% of US and global energy – and switch to expensive, intermittent, unreliable wind and solar energy installations that will require unsustainable amounts of land and raw materials, while destroying wildlife habitats and slaughtering birds and bats by the millions.

Those actions also killed numerous jobs and left many communities impoverished. Simply put, the danger to Americans’ health and welfare, livelihoods and living standards is regulations imposed in response to secretive, sloppy, substandard science that has ill-served EPA and the nation.

Ethics charges against Mr. Pruitt should be evaluated with all this in mind – and while acknowledging that members of Congress who are railing against him never complained about Lisa Jackson or Gina McCarthy’s CASAC payment abuses, illegal experiments on human test subjects, false testimony about particulates, EPA-orchestrated sue-and-settle lawsuits that imposed billions in regulations while enriching environmentalist groups … and junk-science regulations that cost the United States incalculable billions of dollars, brought no environmental benefits, and impaired the welfare of millions of people.

Pruitt’s reforms are long overdue. Honest politicians, journalists and voters will applaud him and them. Other government agencies should initiate similar science and rulemaking reforms.

Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and author of books and articles on energy and environmental policy.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 07:02 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 1530 words, total size 16 kb.

1 I love the information on your website, the content is direct to the point and well organized
Yellow Xanax 2 mg Bars R039
BUY YELLOW XANAX BARSbuy halcion online
buy 2mg xanax bars online,buy xanax bars online, buy green xanax bars online, buy xanax bars online overnight, buy real xanax bars online, buy xanax bars online no prescription, can you buy xanax bars online

There are still thousands of people who don’t live in areas that are served by local dispensaries. We offermail order marijuanaandCBD HEMP FLOWERin USA, Canada, UK, Australia, Europe and most parts that are both fast and discreet and always include tracking numbers.

Click here to talk on snapchathttp://bit.ly/31ylfOQ

Looking for a safe and secure place where there isweed for sale online? We are the solution to your problem. Nobody does this better than US. Now you canbuy marijuanaor weed online andmail order marijuanaandbuy CBD hemp flowerproducts online with maximum privacy.

Order weedonline UK, EU, USA. We use a unique "stealth” and double vacuum seal packaging that prevents customs from finding what’s inside, even if they open the package to inspect. However, there is no mention of marijuana on the package. We use stealth packages on all packages for the safety of our valued customers and they will never have any problems with customs.

We offer a guaranteed, reliablemedicinal marijuana buyingand shipping experience for our customers.Yellow Xanax,https://buypainkillers.net/

The news coming out surroundinghigh-cannabidiolcannabis oil is simply miraculous. Families are moving to Colorado and many other places where the can find CBD oil and related products, to treat their children for rare epileptic conditions that no other medicines work against. Even the most powerful pharmaceuticals in the world are proving completely ineffective against conditions like Dravet syndrome, Doose syndrome, infantile spasms, and more. However, through the use of high-CBD cannabis oil, these families are finding hope. The majority of patients using this oil are seeing massively beneficial effects, including near-complete remission. This medicine is going to change the world, and it's only a matter of time until it is available to every human on the planet. Kifpot.com is here to make sure that your CBD products are being Delivered to your door steps. Offering you the best prices


Say no to depression, suffering from cancer, glaucoma,headache, insomnia, joint pains, multiple sclerosis, muscle spasms, nausea, etc kifpot.com is the best Legal CBD products online storewhere you can buy all your CBD needs online, buy hemp flowers online, buy CBD oil online, buy hemp oil online, Buy CBD isolate power online, dabs pens for sale, vape pens for sale,Buy CBD isolate crystals and Buy CBD edibles online, very affordable prices. We ship worldwide.

website. kifpot.com

Email.... info@kifpot.com

wholesale cbd flower europe,Hemp Flower, BenefitsOf CBD Rich Hemp Flower, CBD Hemp Flower vs. Marijuana Flower, CBD Helps to Relieve Pain,BUY HEMP CBD FLOWER ONLINE,

biy hemp flower online, wholesale cbd flower, cbd flower delivery ship worldwide, cbd flower for sale, wholesale cbd cookies, cbd flower online,buy cherry wine cbd flower online,elektra cbd hemp flower, cbd flower wholesale,wholesale cbd hemp flower, cbd hemp flower online, buy cbd crystals, buy cbd oil, buy cbd isolates, buy cbd powder . cbd flower for sale, cbd hemp flower for sale, cbd hemp, buy cbd hemp, cbd flower europe, cbd flower europe, buy cbd flower europe, buy hemp flower europe, buy hemp flower online

Posted by: buy halcion online at February 08, 2020 11:03 PM (Ma3Lv)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




35kb generated in CPU 0.02, elapsed 0.288 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2688 seconds, 108 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Canada Free Press
Christian Daily Reporter

_+
Daren Jonescu
Dana and Martha Music On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
The Reform Club
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 37919
  • Files: 15567
  • Bytes: 885.0M
  • CPU Time: 113:58
  • Queries: 1548651

Content

  • Posts: 18591
  • Comments: 54455

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0